RedWorker

No. I mean, it's decided that when readership falls below a certain number of people for a certain time period the media will no longer receive resources from the commune, or at least less.

Teachers very clearly sell their labour-power to an employer.

Some media centres will be expropriated and put under workers' control, and will probably be made subservient to the political and territorial workers' councils. Other media will remain more independent; while others remain in bourgeois hands.

"Someone wants to start a newspaper and wants to have it printed 100,000 times each day. But this is not only one person wanting this. It's many wanting their private media."

I'm not sure what you mean. Many people want it? So what's the problem? There'd presumably be some cut off of users at which point communes will not supply media with resources to produce it from the common pool of resources.

As for free speech, it means not being actively silenced, individually or in groups, as opposes to just lacking access to a platform. We'll probably have both in the transition.

A politician is not exactly a proletarian, he produces no commodities and sells his labour-power to no one in particular. Presumably, formally they are employees of the state, but meaningfully they are more self-employed I'd say. Social class is and has always been fluid, not lending itself for crude categorisation. There's always shades of grey in between. I don't think it's particularly relevant to have a precise definition: no one is going to mistakenly stand outside a Parti Popular members of parliament meeting distributing flyers calling on them to join the communists and overthrow the capitalist state since they are obviously oppressed workers.

Hmm, fair enough. I made some adjustments accordingly.

Yeah, I'm really undecided. I'm really pessimistic about the revolutionary character of the 'bourgeosified' working class in developed countries. But misery does not equal revolutionary potential (see Anatomy of the Revolution).

Okay, and if we had Pro, you'd be able to provide necessary coding (or 'steal' them)?

I first approached wiki.yt for free hosting, the person behind it is okay with it. I'm guessing we'd be able to have access to CSS and whatnot as well. I'm not sure if there's any other advantages. We could move there as well, but mwzip works fine it seems (plus Pro is cheap), so....

I don't understand half the things you say when you talk about coding and stuff.

I've tried to copy infobox from communpedia, but it didn't work. Tested it on north korea (see discussion/talk page) but it was messed up. Not sure why, but since you're apparently good with that stuf, maybe you know?

I've tested it twice, lower case p works fine.