chimx

Umm, apparently you have not had any activity since 10/11/2008. And yet just now I read you were removed from the CC...

What the fuck was that all about then?

"To ask you a question, what do you see as being negative about this kind of activity?" thats his thang,

do you know any free online chess games we can play over the internet

We have completely different perspectives.
The working class and the peasantry have to be united under one banner when a revolution occurs. And the banner will be of that party/organization which has the correct ideas,methods,traditions and perspectives and with which the majority will identify with.

We see the counter-revolutionary role of the other sects which due to their opportunism and reformism did not earn the trust and support of the workers(SR's , Mensheviks).

Also we have completely different views on the Makhnovists and KRonstadt.
For me Makhno was part of the petit-bourgeois reaction and had no relation to anarchist-communism which is the only form of anarchism which is somewhat acceptable to communists although we don't agree with you.

Now what else.
Hmm.
Oh ya the Soviet Union did not degenerate because of the structure of the Bolshevik party or the ideas of LEninism.
That is an idealist thing to say .
It is because of the objective conditions of Russia at that time.
And of course Lenin and Totsky were not evil villains.
Even Stalin was not an "evil dictator" .

im not blind from party propaganda.
The whites fought against the bolsheviks
the anarchists fought against the bolsheviks.
In a time of revolution whoever fights against the party expressing the majority of the workers is a reactionary as he divides the workers movement.

They did not kill anarchists which were not counter-revolutionary.
They even allowed them to honour Kropotkin etc.Self-proclaimed "anarchists" who died were so reactionary that they were hardly distinguishable from the Whites

I am a marxist-leninists. I am anti-revionist in the sense, I think its important to maintain the correct line, to guard the Party from Right-Opportunism and Left-Sectarian. I am not a fan of Hoxha or Mao but do not have hard feelings against hoxha. I think Trotskyists, historical trotskyists have caused a lot of harm to the working class movement. Asking people to rebel and be outraged at everything even when it is not justified. I do not think most people who identify with Trotsky are real Trotskyists, just new to working class politics. Remember Trotsky is seen as a saint in the west for a reason. Divide the working class movement.

I do think Stalin did follow the Leninist line, he made mistakes and he made good successes for workers around the world. He is mostly demonized out of the bourgeoisie propaganda machine, they are the same people who lie about everything. I think the mistakes made were mostly after the second world war, when after the war the Military structure of the party which was needed for wartime made it hard for rank and file party members to throw out the revisionists an careerist.

There was violations of Socialist Legality at times, but I do under the circumstance think this was in a very difficult time. This was no cake walk utopia. Real life sometimes causes things to not go to plan every once and awhile.

Rosa Luxemburg on the other hand was a good comrade who sacrificed her life for the working class movement. I have no problem with Rosa Luxemburg. I do however think this group of people who consider themselves Luxemburgists are a little weird. The Luxemburgists here in Canada think pedophiles are sexually repressed, they go by the name Spartacus. They are the weirdest group of the Ultra-Left I've ever seen.