Holden Caulfield

Hehe thanks.
famous monsters is a goodun

[quote]i dont see why you said my stance on no platform made me unsuitable to be mod??![quote]

i dont recal saying that it was your stance on no platform that made you unsuitable to be an mod, and if i seem to have did say so i apolegise because i think i was unclear.
as far as i involved myself in the debate i think i followed the line OI (no matter in wich form) but open for civalised debate = restriction, troll (no matter in wich form) = ban pretty straight.
my objection to you being reinstalted (on this moment, i would like to stress, i still think that eventualy you should become mod again) as mod was purely on the way you handled the situation (the way you fought your war) not on its content.
can you link me to my post, so i can clear up what i meant?

me niether, but i think its a bit silly to allow OI restrictions to exsist but then ban someone for being maybe sympathetic towards an party that, as it seems, succesfully presents it selfs as moderate rightwing populist.
i think OI'rs (fascist or not) need to be restricted, trolls (fascist or not) need to be banned.

no i voted to restrict an pussy liberal (and maybe an fascist troll) who clearly belongs in the OI,
the discussion was if we should ban BNP sympathysers
and i think stupid protest voters not (they should be restricted) members yes.

Yes, i've said so in several threads in the past.

Its not a job for mods to make sect snipes at an organisation to try and discredit it with absolutely hee-haw evidence.