Brosa Luxemburg

Tell him it fucking blows. Like, regardless of what your politics are or aren't most people do not enjoy the military, there are a whole lot of anti-social morons in charge of you, and you have no way to deal with that.

Thanks.

Jacque Camatte explained this position in early 1961 in an article published in Bordiga’s journal 'Il programma comunista': “The proletariat abandons its programme in periods of defeat. This programme is only defended by a weak minority. Only the programme-party always emerges reinforced by the struggle. The struggle from 1926 to today proves that fully.”(51)



http://www.wsm.ie/c/left-communism-a...tique-ideology

continued:

Loren Goldner notes: “For Bordiga, program was everything, a gate-receipt notion of numbers was nothing. The role of the party in the period of ebb was to preserve the program and to carry on the agitational and propaganda work possible until the next turn of the tide, not to dilute it while chasing ephemeral popularity.”(49) Bordiga wrote: “When from the invariant doctrine we draw the conclusion that the revolutionary victory of the working class can only be achieved with the class party and its dictatorship”(50) Bordiga was fully comfortable with the party being small and isolated away from class struggle. What was important for him was that it was fully communist and defended the communist program from those who would dilute it or pervert it from its course, from its realization.

The magazine "red and black revolution" (published by the WSM in Ireland) had a pretty good article on left-communism a few years back, here's an excerpt related to the discussion on Bordiga and the party:

A major reason for this was that the Biennio Rosso of 1919-20 had ended. A revolutionary opportunity was missed and many simply ceased to be engaged in revolutionary class struggle. Bizarrely this did not bother Bordiga or the PCI. Bordiga wrote: “…the centre of the doctrine…is not the concept of the class struggle but that of its development into the dictatorship of the proletariat, exercised by the latter alone, in a single organization, excluding other classes, and with energetic coercive force, thus under the guidance of the party.” In other words, for Bordiga the issue was not class struggle but the purity of the communist program and the ability of the party to seize control of the state.

Well I explained in the group. I was 'National Socialist' but never really went with the Nazi skinhead style or anything like that.
There was a time before that where I was a racist 'anarchist', I was really just some bitter teenager who destroyed shit all the time and never really stood for anything... Just to sum it up.

Historically, I don't support the USSR during the years of Third Period Marxism-Leninism (1928-1935), but I'm not knowledgeable enough on the subject of Third Period Marxism-Leninism specifically to have much of an opinion on it. Do you know of anything I could read on the subject?