Questionable

Focault is right that human "nature" is not intristic biologically, however, focault is a bourgeois intellectual and a postmodernist, i.e. an Idealist. I guess you can say he's a better kind of Idealist, then. That doesn't mean he isn't useful though.

I'm sorry if I gave you the impression that I was attacking you for your question. I was merely pointing out the fact that if you use terms like "Stalin was still a desk worker" in your questions it might be perceived as an attack on anti-revisionism. This worker normally means a person who looks at meaningless reports and has no concept of how things work in the field. This can be seen as a form of elitism, and branding the founder of mental revisionism as an elitist does not go well with many in the in the group. Though I thank you for having an open mind about and not just closing out our group based on this misunderstanding.

I answed your question in the M-L group, not because I appreciated your tone of voice, but I hate it when questions go unanswered.

Hello, sorry for not accepting you to the group sooner. I have been off for a few days (three) for reasons mentioned on the group. I hope you look around there, post your questions et cetera. Apologies again and welcome.