Caj

I'm coming around to it I guess. I mean, I would originally just say that third world countries should "establish a dotp with support of the peasantry (possible a joint dictatorship)" but DNZ made a good point that such a step means, technically, a minority class is waging a war against the majority classes and would be a suicide mission (not, of course, because it is a "democratic no-no"). His idea about the party structure and their roles and the support of progressive forms of militarized society is something I find very interesting and finding myself agreeing with.

His Third-World Caesarean Socialist theory (people give him crap, calling it a "troll theory").

What is your opinion on DNZ's "troll theory"?

Already did

Oh, nevermind then!

Oh well, it's probably going to be deleted anyway, lol

I don't understand. It wasn't like these groups were created to cause trouble, they had actual discussions about actual subjects. The Bolsheviks group was a group dedicated to talking about the history of the Bolshevik revolution. The Third-World Cesarean Socialism group is a group dedicated to discussing revolution in third-world countries, etc.

A whole bunch of groups (like the Anti-Stalinist group) are gone. What happened?

The RedAnarchist23 wrote: "How is making communities self-sufficient a regression,"
It is a regression and counter-revolutionary only because you advocate bourgeois forms of the economy. We Communists also want to make communities as much as possible self-sufficient, but capitalism has already socialised various regions to each other, made them dependent on each other. This effect of capital (if it is environmentally/resourcefully sustainable) must progress rather than regress, because if you regress to earlier periods of market relations, you inevitably end up in capitalism again. Communities must advance this process of socialisation if we are to get to communism, must further integrate with other regions to become one completely socialised organ.