Yes, but not the average sort. Unlike most mutualists, I'm a direct democratic minarchist instead of an anarchist. A liberal socialist. I do prefer revolutionary methods more then the average mutualist gradualism.
Are you a mutualist?
Well, I was restricted for being a 'social democrat', even though I actually believe in revolutionary action (Peaceful if not repress, violent if repressed.) to establish a direct-democratic minarchist society with democratic worker-owned cooperatives competing on the free market. AKA Liberalism (individualism, democracy, free markets) combined with socialism (worker's democratic control.)
I have a Romanian friend who defines as liberal socialist. What are your beliefs, and why are you restricted?
liberal socialist? isn't that contradictory?
Yup, and it really is annoyingly stupid of them to actually restrict me like that. I even made my case in the unfair restrictions thread, but the mods then pretty much ignore me for some strange reasons. This is why we should have elections in order to restrict/ban people. (But, not have restricted people vote for obvious reasons.) Or maybe even have a direct or representative democratic structure instead. So, we don't ultra-powerful mods banning/restricting without even having a good reason.
So you were restricted just because the mods assumed you're a Social Democrat? That's just... I don't know what to say.
Attention all peoples, I am not a social democrat. Please look at my posts across the opposing ideologies forum to see why.
They don't seem to know the difference between Social Democrats and Democratic Socialists..... *sigh*.
If you feel a mistake has been made then post in the Unfair Restrictions thread and make your case.
The People's Cybersecurity
Anti-fascist
Banned
