RedSunRising

It's true that some Trotskyists fit into your description, but I think your idea is still too sectarian generally speaking.

I think though there are a lot of orthodox Trotskyists who are very honest and principled too.

Just saying, I find it funny that some Maoists see Trotskyists as a greater potential enemy than Islamists.

I mean if hypothetically Islamists take over India for example, what do you think will happen to the Maoists there?

People need to be selfish to some extent and have a good sense of self-preservation. As Sunzi once said, war is a matter of life and death above all else.

Yeah there was to be frank a whole lot of foulness in that thread, I think if it hadnt been stopped probably me and most of the other Leninists would have hit the banhammer in the end.

Kudos to you for taking over the Maoist group ..Its really sad we have lost Red Cat as he/she was one of the best posters we had here.
Thanks again- its good there are still some unbanned MLMs left.

i am opposed, did you follow the links I posted to refute that accusation

actually i know youre secret

you are a hipster for mao

Sure, I can leave, that's no big deal. And I don't have to take sides with either of the parties involved, Maoists nor Trotskyists. Do you mean physical violence, anyway? That seems kind of stupid. I'm not sure how or why their goals would be so opposed that the two groups would need to physically fight each other; roundly, their shared goal is surely the self-emancipation of the working class, as a class for itself, like most other communists. To be honest, I would probably side with neither because I am quite dubious of the politics of party-building and consciousness-raising (these seems to be the modus operandi of both Maoism and Trotskyism).

I'll consider that an option.