councils/soviets would need an overall centralisation, balanced by worker's democracy on the local level. Otherwise overall plans cannot be made. the party is required to have an effective and organised structure to combat the potential of counter-revolution and to maintain the proletarian dictatorship. but then what the fuck does this have to do with the topic on feminism? you are just throwing around personal insults mindlessly. maybe you don't realise it, but you are indirectly defending the likes of Thatcher through your defence of bourgeois Western feminism.
I have propaganda posters? Awesome.
Ha! You say I'm spamming you just because you can't answer to my points. What a ridiculous idiot you are. Your definition of "democratic centralism" doesn't really mean anything, because it does not in any way contradict with what I said about the structure of the Soviets in general.
Also, it's not just a single blog. You are ignorant and are not qualified to speak about this matter. Have a look at books such as "The Trans-sexual Empire".
I think it is you who have no idea about democratic centralism. You just want to have the democracy without the centralism. Regarding the blog, why should you care about it so much anyway? I wasn't even addressing you. Do you really feel bourgeois feminism in the West is something socialists should defend anyway? You claim to be a CWI member or ally, which I actually heavily doubt, but here is a CWI article on bourgeois feminism which should educate you: http://www.socialistparty.org.uk/socialistwomen/sw7.htm
And without overall central co-ordination, how the hell are you going to have an overall planned economy? And what the fuck is wrong with my point about feminism? You think a socialist shouldn't criticise bourgeois feminism, or that feminism and anti-patriarchy is an issue that is distinct from class society in general, or that it is ok for feminists to be transphobic?
Well, let's see... You have not made any criticism at all, except just blank slogans. Your critique has absolutely no substance. So how about you tell me which views of mine you don't agree with first, as in, in detail? You are an idiot.
I don't need you to lecture me on anything, especially not a simplistic "one-liner" which means absolutely nothing. Fuck off, and stop harassing me.
Hi
Well if you read the opening page, you will see that my essay of determinism has yet to be published. However, you can find my demolition here: http://www.revleft.com/vb/my-usual-p...568/index.html http://www.revleft.com/vb/freedom-st...x.html?t=56836 http://www.revleft.com/vb/showpost.p...37&postcount=2 http://www.revleft.com/vb/showpost.p...16&postcount=1 http://www.revleft.com/vb/showpost.p...37&postcount=2 But most recently here: http://www.revleft.com/vb/question-f...656/index.html http://www.revleft.com/vb/showpost.p...7&postcount=53
