Rafiq

You know I'm a Kurd living in the Middle East, right?

Anyway, no it's not just the third world point and as I said, you either see it or not, I see little point arguing about all this nonsense.

You to BMH: "Laugh if you will, we do exist and sooner or later this return to it's foundations will have to be realized or Marxism will perish."

BMH to you, perhaps: "Let it. Marxism: the last refuge of the bourgeoisie."

Don't be surprised, since ironically he's so into crisis theory. I know you're sympathetic with it, but it's overrated, and if emphasized enough it can very well be "Marxism for the bourgeoisie."

"Hoxha is always right."

I know of it. Those people can believe what they'd like. The fact is that there's more than a few sources to demonstrate that Beria not only was a reactionary, but even had a hand in Stalin's murder.

See what I told you about that first axiom?

No, he wasn't. Hoxha had a high opinion of Molotov and noted that the Central Committee of the PLA expected him to succeed Stalin, but obviously that didn't happen.

Some "Stalinists" have a high opinion of Beria (e.g. Grover Furr, Bill Bland), some do not (Ludo Martens for instance.)

Beria was a reactionary and intriguer, as Hoxha noted.