Black Sheep

I believe this is the most natural form of organisation for the working class and a true revolution which wont be hijacked or destroyed.

If you're interested, beyond reading texts (which might give you theory you doubt) I suggest reading up on Paris 68, theres a good article on Wikipedia. The slogans from that movmenet (and theres a big list of them on the BOP website, type BOP May 68 Graffiti into wiki for info). Thats what got me into the movement. Its sort of like modenr marxism, its considered a new school becuase it developed in the 60s and 70s. I think its how the revolution will happen, I dont think there will be a vanguard party. I

The IWW are considered an Autonomist union by many in the sense that they dont' follow an ideological line, but simply rely on working class elf-organisaiton. The IWW may seem Anarcho-Syndicalist, thats because Autonomism and Anarchism are as I said, very similar.

It may sound like we're basically calling against organisation. We're not, we're just taking a more modenr approach to revolution and saying if its true, the working class will resist capitalism and the state in the natural form it chooses to take. As Marxists we just have to be there to imbue the right class conciousness and help the movement!

Examples are revolutions or insurrections such as the movements of 1968, especially May 68, where the working class and students spotaneously rose up without the unions or Communist Party directing it and formed there own organisaitons which were revolutionary, such as factory floor occupation commitees, university occupation committees, etc.

kk. autonomism is an division of Marixm very close to the anarchist movement which holds that the working class can create a revolution and organise itself outside of traditional forms of organisation such as trade unions, parties, etc. It has a large emphasis on spotaneity, the momentum of a genuine grassroots revolution paralysing the bourgeoisie and preventing them being able to deal with the movement (either by absorbing parties/unions into the status quo or simply crushing/arresting them).

graftikes sto chess.com?

ine to kainourgia add-on(etsi to ipe o malte ) pou anti gia monogrammes apantiseis tipou simfono klp, apla patas to koumpi kato deksia thanks

http://www.revleft.com/vb/group.php?groupid=68
tetia timi sou kanane, pou pirane kai to avatar sou gia ikona tou group?

http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/7...llookinkj4.png

Lolololololol

Scroll through that

Sorry, I clicked something wrong. I meant for that to be a response to GeorgiDimitrovII's comment below.

Comrade, forgive me, but wasn't Tim Buck the founder of the CPC? Hardial Bains was the CPC-ML founder. The CPC as it stands sounds revisionist...even reformist. I've seen nothing to indicate that they are anti-revisionist.
Second-oldest? Of all parties? I don't think so.
I sympathize with the CPC-ML, but am uncertain about it's method of trying to make use of the bourgeois electoral system. I would support the RCP.

I had the same reaction when I first heard it said ver batim. This guy was really drunk, but he made a lot of sense. It's a great line, but its damn true.