Ismail

"bourgeois ideology takes on within the ranks of the revolutionaries, its material basis is, and this can hardly be overemphasised, the persistence of capitalist relations of production in society." ooh! This is exactly what has been my basic thought, i have not finished it yet, but i sense this might lead to the class relations of the household as well?

I have been reading your signature links. Gorbachev. what. a. pig. I did not know this this precisely, huff. I have to catch up reading the other things you have linked, i m very grateful for your support comrade!

Fuck, thats a really great site there. I will enjoy.

Why do Hoxhaists support "national liberation" struggles? This seems to be a historically invalidated strategy. Did Hoxha write anything about it?

Ahh, and in the already highly advanced capitalist countries there already is great proletarisation and monopolosiation, the "Vergesellschaftung" ,socialisation of production what Lenin argued about in 'Imperialism-highest stage...' had already occurred in western capitalist countries, this all is making more sense now i think. So what would had to have been done differently in Germany for instance in 1919 in relation ot the peasantry?

My question on the terminology then: "The CPSU (b) thereafter began to consider the tasks of the completion of the advance to a classless socialist society and the gradual establishment of communism.", so the ending of the "exchange economy" he basically means markets, no? So they were all aware that socialism is not a classless society yet, that they had capitalist organisation of production was clear to them, yes? I was aware of markets being re-introduced but did not know this other info. Yes i see now more of what had to be done then: get rid of all markets to create a social society, and then first widescale decentralisation of production could have happened etc, yes? This makes sense and am very glad you sent me this, thank you alot!

Thanks you, how do you get to these amazing compilation essays? They are pact with great information

Oh! Very interesting second essay, thank you! Although i agree that the industrial working class are the most revolutionary, i would very much think it of benefit to ally with anarchist peasant revolutionaries, (if they are still even into this idea^^ [Btw. i think land farmers are absolutely minimal now, what, like 2% of the labor force?]) besides the petty-bourgeois and wage workers ("Lohnabhängige"?) inclusion of the revolutionary replacement of the state. About the ending of the 'exchange', you then also agree that The USSR never had real socialism, yes? This is really a great writing you sent me, the second one especially, many thanks!