BobKKKindle$

Ghandi was operating in the contexts of his time, but to call the man who brought down the Indian Empire a pro-imperialist hack is one of the most absurd things I have heard in a while. I am not talking about Saint Ghandi, I am talking about non-violent revolution that worked- moron!!! By the way, what gives you the right to call me a racist? Where have I ever condoned any form of racism? I notice you don't attack Homorevolutionary for his stance on Tibet which may be seen as racist too. As usual you are too thick or too bigotted to listen to what people say- where did I support the occupation of Afghanistan, I described it as a cancer you buffoon.

Bob- clever bit of unspeak there. They have been careful not to use the word genocide because of the legal implications it involves. However the UN published a 176 page report documenting mass murders and rapes. Many activists, however, refer to the crisis in Darfur as genocide, including the Save Darfur Coalition, the Aegis Trust and the Genocide Intervention Network. . Other activist organizations, such as Amnesty International, while calling for international intervention, avoid the use of the term genocide.
So you are now using imperialist paradigms to define your stance over humanitarian issues- how very revolutionary of you.

Bollocks. You seem not to be able to separate revolution from militantism to start with, so much for Gandhi. Secondly, supporting reactionary groups who happen to be fighting other reactionary groups is not fighting imperialism on the long term basis.
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20010604/20010522

Not really... It might not be perfect but it's all we've got.
http://darfurinformation.com/hc_un_envoy.asp

Hey I would like to get classes by Rawenthic on maoism. I saw your thread.