Questionable

Also, you see the irony with getting upset about not answering questions, correT?

1. I clearly said I will get back to you. I don't have time for the answers I want to give you.
2. I have read that before, so I don't feel the need to reread it on a 1.5 inch screen on a bus.
3. No, my assertion is that the negation of the negation was dropped, ie it wasn't talked about. My proof is that it wasn't talked about. Are you really this dumb that you cannot grasp that?

Except the argument is he dropped it. Which he did, else he would have mentioned it.
I fail to see how that's a logical fallacy.

Ill get back to the rest of your questions later tonight. Phone keeps shitting out.

I have no idea how long this is, so part 1.

If ywere doing that, thyen I'm also a sophmore in college and on the deans list, so I fail to see the relevance.

I've never pissed nor cried as a result. Its just frustrating because I was under false information of tito at the time, and I never really considered myself a titoite. Much how ismail brings up mao.

I don't dig through your old posts I just read old threads when I get bored.

Questionable that last point is really funny. You've never been able to show me wrong. I want to keep this public for the sole purpose of showing everyone who looks at my profile to see what a cultist.stalinists are. Innfact, you've been the only one mentioning that, so I think you want to make it private so you won't be embarrassed anymore.

Also, how do I rage quit?

Lolwut? What questions? I mean, you think you've demolished me because I couldn't get yourquestions in that rant you had where all you did was repeat the smae thing fucking ober and over, you have yet to answer why stalin ommitted the negation of the negation.
And lol your so good at debates. Make a thread so ismail can help you out more publicly? I mean, help me revleft I have no idea how to debate third worldists!
That point about the neg of the neg being published elsewhere as evidencee for stalin accepting it makes as much sense for showing khruschev as a leninist because he published lenins work in the world too. Did that go ovedr your npigshit brain too?
You have yet to provide any proof other than a 1931 text.

Lol questionable. I sure am popular with you. Too bad all these posts are just long rants all on the same thing, and many of my points went right over your head.
My argument is stalin dropped the negation of the negation, my evidence is he never talked about it. If someone talks of biology and never brings up lamark, it is safe to say they have dropped that. Your claim is that stalin upheld the negation of the negation. I have yet to see evidence for this.
Also, drop the jackass act. Your too stupid for it.

I have yet to see any proof for that work being published in its entirety past 1938. I also want evidence for that work being published in 19444, but regardless, an english translation of a 1931/7 book doesn't mean anything. Ffs, didn't the post stalin stalinists publish das kapital and lenin?

You have no proof for any of these things because stalin omitted thyem in order to justify the state.

As to your last point, your returning to your idiocy (did you ever leave it?) Bgecause I fail to see where I have said that.

And like I said when I get back to my pc I will further researcg this to check out the validity of your claims.
If writing on the neg of the neg was so redundant, why did stalin write on dialectics at all? Why did he write on the dialectics but not include the negation of the negation. Answer this question.

What? Where did I imply that at all? Where did I argue that? Stalin was simply a tool. I don't care what his true feelings were irrelevant. The stalinist state dropped the neg of the neg and this is evidenced by its leader not caring to even mention such an important congress. You still have yet to prove anything. Even althuusser is against you.

Show me a post 1938 text that talked about the neg of the neg. That's what I asked. Show me a post 1938 publication and then we can have this "debate". You haven't proved anything. You have stated stalin did not drop the neg of the neg, yet you cannot provide a source where he talks about it. So if he didn't drop this important concept, why did he not mention it?

I bet you won't do this, and you'll go back to your usual shit like you always do when you don't have a microsoft doc to quote.