Tab Content
No Recent Activity

902 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    scene is quite crappy , or lets say it doesnt exist

    there are only two organisations - parties

    Jugoslav communists of Montenegro - titoists , jugo-nostalgic , grey heads
    Union of Communists of Jugoslavia - Communists of Montenegro - same as above but i think bigger a bit

    there are few independend unions - half state controlled , half not efficient , we didnt even have real 1 may protests
  2. The Ben G
    View Conversation
    N00b. I still have more group memberships than you.
  3. View Conversation
    Whoa I was all kinds of high when I wrote that. Don't let the Hoxhaists see it.
  4. TheSamsquatch
    View Conversation
    Thanks for the heads up
  5. Blake's Baby
    View Conversation
    He's not very good at understanding things is he?

    "Why am I restricted because you're all murderers?" is probably not going to win him many friends I think.
  6. TheSamsquatch
    View Conversation
    Oh man, i didn't know that. I'll edit it
  7. Chambered Word
    View Conversation
    Get the fuck on Facebook nao.
  8. Chambered Word
    View Conversation
    I'm not shedding any tears
  9. View Conversation
    How to stay active for 50 years: (1) stay active; (2) always listen to your conscience; (3) don't die.
  10. View Conversation
    I first got into politics 50 years ago this month.
Showing Visitor Messages 511 to 520 of 902

About AK

Basic Information

Date of Birth
February 5, 1995 (22)
Generic Marxist → Leninist → Trotskyist → Council Communist → Anarchist
Melbourne, Australia
Bringing down the walls of society that the ruling class holds dear, doing whatever.
High School Student (Year 10)
Political Statement
Autogestion & Autonomy


Total Posts
Total Posts
Posts Per Day
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
Most Recent Message
9th October 2010 02:14
Total Thanks
Total Thanks
General Information
Last Activity
7th December 2010 05:00
Join Date
5th September 2009
Home Page

65 Friends

  1. ∞


    • Send a message via Yahoo to ∞
  2. Adil3tr

    Adil3tr Offline


  3. Admiral Swagmeister G-Funk

    Admiral Swagmeister G-Funk Offline

    sick with irony

  4. Amphictyonis

    Amphictyonis Offline


  5. AnthArmo

    AnthArmo Offline

    Question All Authority

  6. AntinoiteBolshevik

    AntinoiteBolshevik Offline

    Militant Gay Leninist

  7. BeerShaman

    BeerShaman Offline

    Junior Revolutionary

    • Send a message via MSN to BeerShaman
  8. blackwave

    blackwave Offline

    Nothing Human Is Alien to Me

  9. bricolage

    bricolage Offline

    more penguins

  10. CELMX

    CELMX Offline

    frankie-fuckin-four fingers

Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 65
Page 1 of 7 123 ... Last
  • Jump to page:

Recent Entries

View AK's Blog

Class Rule And The Right Way To Do It

by AK on 22nd April 2010 at 12:46
"Reform or revolution?" is one of the biggest and most controversial questions asked when it comes to creating a socialist society. One question that is rarely asked is that of the class rule that should come place after the revolution. Whilst all socialists agree it must be democratic, there are other questions that need to be asked - but rarely are. Questions such as "Will this democracy be representative or direct?" The answer lies in how minority classes come to rule society.


Updated 18th June 2010 at 09:47 by AK

My Writings, Social Classes, What I Wrote When I Was A Marxist

Bourgeois and Bourgeoisie: Common Misspellings and Incorrect Usages

by AK on 12th April 2010 at 10:50
[B][I]Bourgeoise [/I]- as well as other similar misspellings - are not words. It pisses me off when people misspell or incorrectly use these leftist terms. Learn how to correctly spell and use them. I can't stress this enough.[/B]

[B]Bourgeoisie (Noun): [/B]The upper ruling capitalist class of private property owners which do not work on the means of production that they own; instead, hiring workers to carry out the labour.
[B]Bourgeois (Adjective): [/B]Of or relating to the


Updated 13th April 2010 at 14:43 by AK


The Myth of the Middle Class: Blurring Class Lines and Dividing Labour

by AK on 3rd April 2010 at 10:10
All classes, past and present, have been and are defined by their relation to productive property. Under capitalism this can be shown by observing an individual's relation to the means of production (also known as private property; as opposed to personal property which includes tangible items as well as houses, cars, trucks and boats): the working class of Proletarians which own no means of production of their own have to sell their labour to the Bourgeoisie (or sometimes the Petit-Bourgeoisie)


Updated 7th May 2010 at 07:37 by AK

My Writings, Social Classes

The Myth of the Middle Class

by AK on 7th March 2010 at 12:49
[COLOR=Black][B]UPDATE: This entry has been superseded by [URL=""][I]The Myth of the Middle Class: Blurring Class Lines and Dividing Labour[/I][/URL][/B]

All historical and current social classes are defined by property ownership or their relation to production. So where does this ambiguous "middle class" fit in with respect to property ownership or a relation to production? Nowhere, it is merely an attempt to disprove Marxist


Updated 9th April 2010 at 04:02 by AK

My Writings, Social Classes

War - To The Victor Go The Spoils

by AK on 3rd March 2010 at 08:35
[B][I]ALL [/I]war is for the purposes of economic dominance.

[/B]Even a Communist revolution (if violent - which will inevitably always be as the state has become too powerful) is for the purposes of economic dominance as it entails the working class of Proletarians taking over the economy and placing the means of production and distribution under democratic control - not the control of a privileged few.

Just as in any other war, the spoils will go to the victor in Iraq.


Updated 18th June 2010 at 09:38 by AK

My Writings, What I Wrote When I Was A Marxist