I e-mailed a comrade regarding my new concept of building a mass party holding the umbrella position of "radical social-labour democracy." In this umbrella are three specific positions:
1)
"Radical United Social Labour": per Kautsky, the "union of the labour movement and socialism" (so here we're talking about both Marxist and non-Marxist socialism, as well as the workers' labour movement - and not an expanded workers' movement encompassing cultural organizations, sports clubs, soviets, workplace committees, etc.)
[This position can be held by proles - manual, clerical, or professional - and non-proles,
and this is where the pareconists fit within]
2) "Radical labour democracy": Ordinary proletocrats and non-workers upholding the ordinary proletocratic position ("Lenin-socialists"), who realize that the workers' movement must be expanded to workers' organizations beyond labour unions
3) "Radical social-labour democracy": Social-proletocrats and non-workers upholding the social-proletocratic position
Rest assured, the experience I don't want repeated is the BELGIAN experience (in this day and age, having elements of the "left wing" of the US Democratic or Canadian Liberal parties as members of the organization for Radical Social-Labour Democracy
).