N.E.T Wikipedia article

  1. Dimentio
    Skip Sievert has succeeded in bringing down the wikipedia entry on N.E.T. His method was simple. He constantly bashed at the wiki administrators that N.E.T, according to him, was a "scam" organised to steal money from people, and that we are not an existing organisation, but a "group of bloggers" (he does'nt even know what a blog is).

    N.E.T with 36 members, a registration number, a number of successful activities in several European countries, several publications, has done more for technocracy than Skip has managed to do ever. And now he is deliberately sabotaging us.

    I was ignoring him, and so were the rest of us, but now, we need to counter his desinformation campaign.

    Firstly, we need an interview with some magazine or something of that magnitude, to be able to verify our existence by the usage of a third source. We have interviews with Swedish magazines.

    Skip is obsessed with bringing us down, for no particular reason.
  2. Bright Banana Beard
    Bright Banana Beard
    I would say email any famous journalist about what you represented. Avoid any mention of this site as it will target you another "revleft utopianer"

    but I dont have resource to get to help you, I would say get TIME journalist.
  3. Dimentio
    I would say email any famous journalist about what you represented. Avoid any mention of this site as it will target you another "revleft utopianer"

    but I dont have resource to get to help you, I would say get TIME journalist.
    An anarchist zine would do, actually. Or any zine (except porn/nazism).
  4. Cult of Reason
    Cult of Reason
    Do you still get mail from Skip? He was very pleased with himself.
  5. Dimentio
    Do you still get mail from Skip? He was very pleased with himself.
    Yes, I got it but did'nt bother reading it.

    Fun thing that we in N.E.T is not focusing one bit on dissecting his "movement".
  6. ÑóẊîöʼn
    ÑóẊîöʼn
    Firstly, we need an interview with some magazine or something of that magnitude, to be able to verify our existence by the usage of a third source. We have interviews with Swedish magazines.
    Isn't that good enough? Doesn't this mean that Skip has no fucking case?

    But if you don't feel like trying to point this out to the other Wikipedia editors, I can see why you would want an interview with a English-speaking publication.
  7. Dimentio
    Isn't that good enough? Doesn't this mean that Skip has no fucking case?

    But if you don't feel like trying to point this out to the other Wikipedia editors, I can see why you would want an interview with a English-speaking publication.
    Skip discourages all Swedish interviews as falsifications. He is very, very, VERY eager to see us removed from the web.