This just doesn't isn't true. I don't know how else to respond to this. The idea that Maoists are the victims of a massive Anarchist-Trotskyist-Hoxhaist-Left Communist alliance is nothing short of a persecution complex, and the suggestion that all their criticisms are identical is erroneous. Where are the anarchists criticizing China for denouncing Stalin? Where are the Hoxhaists criticizing Mao for not utilizing the theory of permanent revolution?
I'll admit it was pretty disappointing when people whom I considered comrades pulled a 180 and branded me as a closet white nationalist, especially when I'd put so much effort into defending communism from ignorant redditors, but that's not the point. I was simply pointing out that some Maoists (Not all of them) tend to attach names to their opponents which don't mean anything instead of actually addressing their concerns.
Depends on how you define "success." I'm glad whenever a Maoist guerilla defends poor peasants from the forces of imperialism, but I consider it to be a form of radical nationalism, so whatever successes they achieve from that perspective will ultimately be a dead end from a Marxist perspective.
I can't speak for Ismail but I have plenty of real criticisms of Maoism beyond being "jealous" of their peoples' wars, and I know other Marxist-Leninists who do as well. This is a caricature.
Look, this thing has gone on long enough. I'm probably not going to change your mind, and chances are you won't change mind at this moment. I've taken extra care to write this post in a non-insulting manner, and multiple comrades have requested we cool it, so let's just agree to disagree. I concede you have some good points, and I don't hold any animosity toward you even if I disagree with Maoism itself. We've defended figures like Ho Chi Minh together so I know we have some common ground. So let's just put this discussion to rest.