Thomas Sankara: a People's History Caesar of the 20th C?

  1. Die Neue Zeit
    Die Neue Zeit
    Original discussion: http://www.revleft.com/vb/thomas-san...288/index.html

    Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Sankara

    Positives:

    Thomas Isidore Noël Sankara (December 21, 1949 – October 15, 1987) was a Burkinabé military captain, Marxist revolutionary, Pan-Africanist theorist, and communist President of Burkina Faso from 1983 to 1987. Viewed as a charismatic, and iconic figure of revolution, he is commonly referred to as "Africa's Che Guevara."

    Sankara seized power in a 1983 popularly supported coup at the age of 33, with the goal of eliminating corruption and the dominance of the former French colonial power. He immediately launched "the most ambitious program for social and economic change ever attempted on the African continent." To symbolize this new autonomy and rebirth, he even renamed the country from the French colonial Upper Volta to Burkina Faso ("Land of Upright Men"). His foreign policies were centered around anti-imperialism, with his government eschewing all foreign aid, pushing for odious debt reduction, nationalizing all land and mineral wealth, and averting the power and influence of the IMF and World Bank. His domestic policies were focused on preventing famine with agrarian self-sufficiency and land reform, prioritizing education with a nation-wide literacy campaign, and promoting public health by vaccinating 2.5 million children against meningitis, yellow fever and measles. Other components of his national agenda included planting over ten million trees to halt the growing desertification of the Sahel, doubling wheat production by redistributing land from feudal landlords to peasants, suspending rural poll taxes and domestic rents, and establishing an ambitious road and rail construction program to "tie the nation together." Moreover, his commitment to women's rights led him to outlaw female genital mutilation, forced marriages and polygamy; while appointing females to high governmental positions and encouraging them to work outside the home and stay in school even if pregnant
    Questionable:

    In order to achieve this radical transformation of society, he increasingly exerted authoritarian control over the nation, eventually banning unions and a free press, which he believed could stand in the way of his plans and be manipulated by powerful outside influences. To counter his opposition in towns and workplaces around the country, he also tried corrupt officials, counter-revolutionaries (and) "lazy workers" in peoples revolutionary tribunals. Additionally, as an admirer of Fidel Castro's Cuban Revolution, Sankara set up Cuban-style Committees for the Defense of the Revolution (CDR's).
  2. Brosa Luxemburg
    Brosa Luxemburg
    Well, this almost seems like a very successful implementation of your views with the positives. Sankara came to power through a breakthrough coup, he tried to complete the tasks of the bourgeois revolution and (from what I have read) his policies pissed off the bourgeoisie both nationally and internationally (although I don't know if they were expropriated like you want them to be) and he used a form of progressive militarized culture (including the use of a cult of personality, albeit not a strong one).

    As for the questionable policies, it seems that there wasn't any outside proletariat party to act in the way you advocate and no independent proletariat organizations that you advocate (such as banning unions).
  3. Die Neue Zeit
    Die Neue Zeit
    Comrade, a left-com once said, as quoted in my slapstick humour thread:

    perhaps there is a reason why NONE of the strongmen you list in your little pamphlet have featured working-class independence beneath them
    But guess what? There was a "strongman" who lost his bout against working-class independence: Bismarck himself! If there can be such independence against antagonistic "strongmen," how much more can be achieved when the "strongman" is cozy with such independence!

    As for Sankara, yeah I don't know how much "industry" was nationalized under his regime. If he had been a full-fledged TWCS-ist, then on social issues he'd be an example of an El Presidente coming from some "Party of Liberty" / Socialist Freedom Party rather than some "Party of Order" / Socialist Fatherland Party.