Can only a socialist revolution of the oppressed save Palestine-Israel conflict?

  1. Revolting Rebel
    Revolting Rebel
    I agree with the position, first put forward by Chomsky I think, that the Israel-Palestine conflict was created to prove real freedom, the anarcho-socialism of Spain, was not possible. In this way, the UN created Israel as a way to continue Hitler's plan of the seperation of races to discredit socialsm by getting the working classes of each country and race to identify with the rich of their own country over an international view of identifying with the plight of the poor and minorities of other countries, the view that leads to a revolutionary subjectivity.

    I think a "two-state" solution will only lead to some form of state-capitalist apartheid with Palestine suffering. Only the overthrow of the theocratic state can end this apartheid, and even then, without an economic revolution, Palestine will just be conquered by imperialism; if Africa is evidence, things could even get worst, though i can't imagine how. I suppose, the US/UN might forcibly relocate all Palestinians to different areas of the Middle East - the US does own most of it now.

    It's amazing how much Franz Fanon explains about the use of torture by Colonialism is exactly what we are doing now. Waterboarding and other tortures they use tap into primitive parts of the brain they can overload the reflex response. He explains how it leads to PTSD in the both the soldiers/torturer and the tortured/imperialized people.

    Was just wondering what other people thought. It seems like a radical social change in Palestine could