Would Peronismo be considered a part of thirld-world caesarism? What about Chavismo? Or is Peronismo just straight up fascist?
1) No (against working-class independence) 2) Rhetoric only, as evidenced by the continued existence of the BoliburguesÃ*a Peronism is definitely corporatist. Whether it is straight-up fascist is another question.
So in what ways can Chavez be useful to Caesarism? His image provoked and used for a more radical cause? Finally, do you view him as just a social democrat petty bourgeoisie?
As mentioned in my original article, "People's History, Blocs, and Managed Democracy Reconsidered," one-man executive power can't be dismissed simply like Marx did Bolivar's.
