With the clarifications made, we can finally tie in the organizational contributions of all the three revolutionary "third-generation" Marxists: Lenin, Luxemburg, and Connolly.
The revolutionary and reformist poles are more or less proto-parties within some sort of mass network. You should clarify on the initial size of the two poles, because my thinking is that the revolutionary pole should start out as small as Lenin's Bolsheviks. Meanwhile, that mass network SHOULD be distinctively working class (and preferrably international in its operations, too). That past message of mine regarding the "Party of World Revolution" - that's an internationalist party that doesn't accept non-workers.
With this working-class distinction, the network as a whole could thus be akin to Connolly's "one big union" ("Add to this the concept of one Big Union embracing all and you not only have THE OUTLINE of the most effective form of combination for Industrial Warfare today..."), and will eventually give rise to Luxemburg's revolutionary mass party as the vanguard.