Terrorism really has kind of a broad and vague meaning, doesn't it? What revolutionary activity wouldn't be condemned as terrorist? That being said, I do not advocate any tactic that would harm proletarian people or even petty-bourgeois people. Those who we need to "terrorize," if you'll pardon the expression, are those right up at the top. I think "innocent" is a bit too subjective to determine who is safe from the edge of the guillotine.