Yet I'm still slightly confused by this. From what I understand the idea is that as the relations of capital extend beyond the workplace to what the autonomists called the 'social factory', domination reproduces itself in every inch of societal life. In this way to find each other and establish friendship in our everyday lives (given that our everyday lives, be they in or out of work are inherently political in themselves) is a political act. That being said I imagine the idea probably goes beyond the rather crass summary I've just attempted to give. Anyway my issue is that are these relations of friendship and such not bound to be inherently temporary? When Holloway talks of 'love, friendship, comradeship' my experience is that these do not last as we would like to believe and in cases such as love can transform themselves very easily into hierarchical power relationships, for example Chuck Klosterman once wrote"every relationship is fundamentally a power struggle, and the individual in power is whoever likes the other person less" and I have to agree with him. But am I fundamentally missing something here by reducing this concept to banal ideas of boyfriend/girlfriend/friend etc. I feel I may well be but I also think the emphasis that this idea places on the individual relations and acts we engage in and form can in many ways reduce praxis to the actions of isolated and atomised actors, leading to equally isolated and, ultimately, temporary, results.