Stalin and World War II

  1. hugsandmarxism
    I've been having discussions alot lately with one of my classmates about marxism-leninism, Soviet history, etc., and one thing that grabbed his attention was the Soviet Union's role in the second World War. I'm planning to give him a big bundle of stapled packets on marxism-leninism to get him started on theory, and I'd like something short yet provocative about Stalin and the Soviet victory over fascism to add in as a bonus. Can anyone think of something for me to give him along these lines? Thanks in advance, comrades.
  2. Brother No. 1
    Brother No. 1
    http://www.marx.org/reference/archiv.../war/index.htm

    Heres all the speeches Stalin made during WW2


    http://www.shunpiking.com/ol0207/020...s-USSR-ger.htm

    one of two sources about the Non-agression pact

    http://www.shunpiking.com/ol0207/020...ausesofWW2.htm

    "Causes and lessons of World War two"

    http://web.archive.org/web/200209031...LANDWAR90.html

    On the Winter War, the most talked of subject on the World War two subject involving the USSR if we leace the Non-agression pact out of it.

    http://web.archive.org/web/200209180...VSNaziPact.htm
    the 2nd source on the Germano-Soviet Non-agression pact

    http://www.revolutionarydemocracy.org/rdv12n2/furr.htm

    Gover Furr on the Soviet troops against Anti-Semitism


    http://holocaustcontroversies.blogsp...ompletely.html

    1 source On the invasion of poland


    http://www.bestcyrano.org/filesdepot/?p=1753

    2nd source on Invasion of poland.


    Both by the lovely Gover Furr i believe.
  3. freedon
    freedon
    The most troubling fact of WW2 is that Stalin purged 90% of his generals and admirals and over 50% of the CP. This is probably why he lost so much ground in the first two years. However a friend of mine said that the purges of the generals and of the party were necessary. He said that during the Revolution it was necessary to include all types of untrustworthy elements into the leadership in order to win. This meant Stalin had to kill, not just fire these leaders, since these people were trained to command and kill and had learned all the jargon to appear as Red leaders which made them doubly dangerous. Any comments or are there better reasons?
  4. Charles Xavier
    The most troubling fact of WW2 is that Stalin purged 90% of his generals and admirals and over 50% of the CP. This is probably why he lost so much ground in the first two years. However a friend of mine said that the purges of the generals and of the party were necessary. He said that during the Revolution it was necessary to include all types of untrustworthy elements into the leadership in order to win. This meant Stalin had to kill, not just fire these leaders, since these people were trained to command and kill and had learned all the jargon to appear as Red leaders which made them doubly dangerous. Any comments or are there better reasons?
    You seem to me making some pretty bizarre claims that not even the most extreme anti-communists claim. In fact the reality is as follows:

    During the 1937-38 purges, 34,300 officers and political commissars were expelled for political reasons. By May 1940, however, 11,596 had already been rehabilitated and restored to their posts. This meant that during the 1937-38 purges, 22,705 officers and political commissars were dismissed (close to 13,000 army officers, 4,700 air force officers and 5,000 political commissars), which amounts to 7.7% of all officers and commissars - not 50% as Conquest alleges. Of this 7.7%, some were convicted as traitors, but the great majority of them, it would appear from historical material available, simply returned to civilian life.

    Some people entered the Communist party for reasons other than for socialism or for serving the working class, some were in the party out of self interest or some went as far as sabotage. And keep in mind in 1930 about 10% of the officer were actually former officers from the Tsarist Army.
  5. Comrade_Stalin
    Comrade_Stalin

    Some people entered the Communist party for reasons other than for socialism or for serving the working class, some were in the party out of self interest or some went as far as sabotage. And keep in mind in 1930 about 10% of the officer were actually former officers from the Tsarist Army.
    This is very ture and is one of the problems we have with the Tortskyist, as they point out that you should people with miltary backgrounds lead the army, in other words the the Tsarist generals.