Whilst i understand what you mean when you frame it is a critique rather than something like political tendency, it's not as if 'the critics' come to their points of criticism by accident - nor are they aliens visitors yet to have contact with the history of revolutionary ideas.
Can links not be made between 'nihilist communism' and the ideas/criticisms of earlier writers such as Raoul Vaneigem? There certainly is something in the tone (from what i have read so far at least) that seems new, but yet quite familiar.