Conversation Between Bolshevik Sickle and Ismail

As I said, Khrushchev's successors continued his revisionist policies. Brezhnev's social-imperialist interventions abroad did hasten the fall of the USSR, but in fact its fall was assured once capitalism had been restored. A union of peoples based on a shared commitment to socialism obviously can't exist for long where socialism does not exist, especially as Russian chauvinism became prominent under the revisionists.

Khrushchev was the representative of Soviet revisionism in power. His successors continued his revisionist policies. He slandered Stalin, bastardized Marxism-Leninism through this slander, and presided over the restoration of capitalism in the USSR. Under Khrushchev the CPSU was turned into a bourgeois party. He declared that socialism could be obtained via parliament, that imperialist wars were no longer inevitable and that "reasonable" forces in the capitalist countries were coming to the fore (which meant that they would partake in an imperialist re-division of the world with the Soviet revisionists), and that to speak of the continuation of class struggle in the USSR was erroneous, since the state and party supposedly represented "the whole people" rather than the working class. He rehabilitated the Titoite revisionists and portrayed such countries as India and Egypt as moving away from capitalism despite their repression of communists and their bourgeois leaderships.