Conversation Between Paulappaul and AK

  1. Paulappaul
    Middle Class refers to bourgeois. Lower Middle Class refers to Petite Bourgeois. I have a feeling this refereed to the old labor Anarchist movement.
  2. I'm sorry but I stopped reading after this: Anarchism is lower middle class ideology gone mad; revisionism, the same ideology with its teeth drawn.

    I usually expect to hear this from the heroic anti-impie brigade.
  3. Paulappaul
  4. Paulappaul
    "old pure anarchist doctrine"

    He spoke of Proudhon mainly in his critique of Anarchism, to which I think he is correct. But not necessarily of the "new" anarchist movement which was arising in that time.

    Here are some other Council Communists on Anarchism.
  5. Pannekoek's criticism of anarchism was filled with strawmen:
    http://libcom.org/library/anarchism-...nton-pannekoek
  6. Paulappaul
    The only difference between any Libertarian Socialist theory is that. Council Communism differs from Anarchism by supporting Centralism over Federalism - as I said in Central Planning and Democracy - as well as the use of Marxian philosophy. First generation Council Communists also supported a Party. Furthermore, Council Communists didn't really like Anarchists, and often wrote critiques there of.
  7. Don't take this as a weird form of anarchist "preaching" or something.
  8. You know, basically the only difference between anarchism and council communism is a few portions of theory and the class analysis.
  9. Paulappaul
    Oh and I responded to your comment in Central Planning and Democracy.
  10. Paulappaul
    In the end, if it came down to a revolution between lead by an Anarchist organisation or a Leninist organisation, I’d support an Anarchist against a Leninist any day.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 13
12