Thank you, and as are you, my friend.
reading your posts has made me just that bit more "authoritarian" but nah, I actually enjoy reading them. you're definitely one of the better posters in a board filled to the brim with utopian socialists and closet social democrats (i.e. stalinists).
Private property existed in the USSR and capital did as well. It would seem that the state sought to protect the interests of the bourgeoisie, and work against the Soviet proletariat at that. It's a very brief answer, though.
You've got pretty solid politics. Can I ask you to please elaborate on your view of the USSR, etc. as being capitalists/dictatorships of the bourgeoisie? How can bureaucrats or whatever be classified as bourgeois? I'm just trying to get my head around this whole concept.
