You don't have to like my avatar to be tactful, silly. :P
Ahh, I understand. I apologise if the comment was tactless then. Your new one is just as cool
Ok, so the old avatar is very beautiful. Just. . . at some point, one wants to stop representing one's self as crazy-victim-girl. That's all.
You may use it then, if you'd like.
I liked you old avatar..
Haven't seen you around latel- Wait, just second what Rorschach said
Hey! Thanks, that's really nice of you I'm really surprised I got in actually, and having looked at my thread, I'm a bit worried that people thought I was some sort of stalin apologist Anyway, yeah, don't worry about it, I'm way worse! How was your New Year by the way?
congratzes you!/I told you so. Also, sorry for being all flaky like in (not)responding to you. I will get there. . . someday. . . yeah, sorry.
Hey, In this thread, were you offering criticism of my post, or were you answering the OP's question? Because I don't think there is any contention between what I wrote and Beauvoirs' analysis. In fact, I think they are quite similiar, in that constant action is the definition of man.
*poke*
