How to make it fit in with the rest of the wiki as in organizational structure though? How to make an open and participative process out of it?
Pretty much that, but I'd add editorial work and selection based on quality. y/n?
Actually, I thought of adding the news section to Marxistpedia. But how we ought to do it? Like each user can write news articles as a subpage of their user page and then they get linked from the frontpage? How could it be doen otherwise?
Is "Socialism: Utopian and Scientific", along with certain other writings of Engels, partially infected by idealistic nonsense? In the same way as Lenin-Trotsky-Stalin's 'dialectical materialism'.
I think Marxistpedia should be a Marxist wiki.
I don't think any would contribute to a better Marxistpedia per se. At least, personally I never use featured material. People, I'm guessing, look for specific information, not random featured articles. And contributors will make new pages according to their knowledge, I'm guessing. But if you want those features, I'm fine with them. They may do improve Marxistpedia, I'm just not sure. Have you seen the discussion on the Main Page? What do you think? I do believe Marxistpedia should be more balanced, but still there's a need to discourage Stalinists I feel.
Which of the following should be implemented? Featured articles with article review system (includes article grading), lists of needed articles, several 'project' pages which track certain articles, etc... or other features which exist at Wikipedia.
RevLeft for now. We're not even a week old yet, we don't have nearly enough credit to go and ask marxists.org.
Where do we promote Marxistpedia? Could we ask for a plug from marxists.org or something like that?
No. I mean, it's decided that when readership falls below a certain number of people for a certain time period the media will no longer receive resources from the commune, or at least less. Teachers very clearly sell their labour-power to an employer.
