Log in

View Full Version : Greenpeace millionaires buy up Heathrow land in an attempt to halt expansion



Vanguard1917
13th January 2009, 13:49
Protesters buy up Heathrow land


Land earmarked for the construction of Heathrow's third runway has been bought by anti-expansion protesters.

Land the size of half a football pitch near Sipson village - which would lose hundreds of homes in the expansion - was bought by a Greenpeace coalition.

It has pledged not to sell the land to the government or BAA if the airport expansion gets the go-ahead.

Greenpeace director John Sauven said: "We've thrown a massive spanner in the engine driving Heathrow expansion."

Four key Greenpeace campaigners - including actress Emma Thompson and impressionist Alistair McGowan - bought the land for an undisclosed fee.

Tory front bench spokeswoman Justine Greening and Lib Dem MP Susan Kramer were given a piece of the title to the land by Greenpeace and the group hopes to hand more of the land parcel to others in a bid to complicate any attempt to force them to sell.


They have said plans to increase flights at the airport from 480,000 to 720,000 would create unacceptable noise and pollution.

But BBC transport correspondent Tom Symonds said recent planning legislation included clauses that allowed the courts to consider whether or not a land purchase that blocked planned development was "vexatious or frivolous".

This could, in turn, scupper Greenpeace's plans to obstruct the construction for years.

Our correspondent said the government was due to rule on the plans as early as this week, but that decision may be further delayed.

The airport industry, business and union leaders have said Heathrow's expansion is vital for the British economy's long-term competitiveness and supporters have suggested work on the runway could create up to 65,000 jobs.


Ms Thompson said: "I don't understand how any government remotely serious about committing to reversing climate change can even consider these ridiculous plans."

Mr McGowan said he is in the fight for the long term.

"If it gets to the bulldozer stage, we'll be here getting in the way."
Protesters, including Mr McGowan, have written the words "our climate - our land" on the plot.

Mr Sauven said the group of new landowners would challenge any attempt by the government to force them to sell: "As the new owners of the land where the government wants to build the runway, we'll resist all attempts at compulsory purchase.
"The legal owners of the site will block the runway at every stage through the planning process and in the courts."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/england/london/7825169.stm

ÑóẊîöʼn
13th January 2009, 14:18
What's to stop the government from stepping in and declaring a compulsary purchase?

BobKKKindle$
13th January 2009, 14:33
What's to stop the government from stepping in and declaring a compulsary purchase?

In legal terms, nothing. However, Greenpeace is obviously seeking to draw attention to their campaign, and portray themselves as being victimized at the hands of an oppressive government which does not care about reducing noise pollution or protecting the environment in general. It's a political move, designed to gain as much exposure and sympathy as they possibly can before they are kicked off the land to make way for a new runway, which will allow larger numbers of working people to travel by air instead of having to use other forms of transport or limit their travel to places close to home.

apathy maybe
13th January 2009, 17:02
Personally, I don't give a shit. They have some money, and are buying up the land, good for them, that's all legal, and permitted in capitalism. (I hope no one thinks that they shouldn't have bought the land..., that would be an affront to their individual liberties.)



What's to stop the government from stepping in and declaring a compulsary purchase?
They are handing out "titles" to many different people, before the govt. could buy the land, they would, presumably, have to contact each of these people.

Coggeh
20th January 2009, 23:48
This really p*sses me off about the enviormental movement , I mean come on 65,000 jobs and the advancement of services , and then you get these millionaire tree huggers buying up the land so these jobs can't be created .

F*ck them , the government should just build their anyway .

butterfly
21st January 2009, 08:04
They're not doing this to spite the working class. What you're ultimately claiming is that they bought the land specifically to put people out of jobs.
It's a short lived political statement (the government will get rid of them eventually), designed to bring attention to the issue of pollution as a result of air travel.
Yes it could be described as reactionary but no more so than any other organisation which does not have class struggle at it's centre.
Is womens liberation something to be supported considering the movment is not based on class struggle?