Log in

View Full Version : $163,987,000 in food stamps



cyu
25th December 2008, 05:04
More an emotional appeal than an offer of policy, but still good to see in more "mainstream" media.

Excerpts from http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2008/dec/24/us-economy-food-stamps

I would have been finished in record time had I not been held up at the checkout line because the bozo ahead of me decided to return something. I began to sigh loudly and roll my eyes until I realised that the bozo in question was a young mother obliged to return a pack of chocolate chip cookies she tried to purchase with her food stamps.

I tried not to catch her eye while the cashier recalculated her purchases without the cookies. (Her little boy didn't look too happy.) She was still $1.27 short on her food stamp card, but there didn't seem to be anything else she could spare. She dug into her purse and managed to put together the required sum with dimes and nickels. She smiled at me red-faced as her bags were packed.

I can't help thinking about what sort of Christmas these women and their families are going to have if a packet of chocolate chip cookies and a bottle of orangeade are beyond their reach.

According to government data, as of September, 31.5 million Americans were using the food stamp programme, up 17% from the previous year. That's 10% of the US population.

$163,987,000 – the salary that Henry Paulson, now secretary of the US Treasury, took home in 2006 for his services as CEO of Goldman Sachs.

Two years later, Goldman Sachs required a massive bail-out from taxpayers. Many of these taxpayers may soon be applying for food stamps.

When Paulson sits down to his sumptuous Christmas feast, paid for with some of the spoils from that nine-figure salary, I hope he will he spare a thought for the 10% of Americans who have barely enough to eat.

fabiansocialist
25th December 2008, 09:06
When Paulson sits down to his sumptuous Christmas feast, paid for with some of the spoils from that nine-figure salary, I hope he will he spare a thought for the 10% of Americans who have barely enough to eat.

He and other members of his exalted class will spare them not a second of their time. This is otherwise known as "compassionate conservatism."

The Douche
25th December 2008, 14:52
10% huh? Its interesting that the percentage of people who actively supportted the American revolution, was around 10% of the population...

cyu
25th December 2008, 20:49
This is otherwise known as "compassionate conservatism."


Haha, no kidding. The very fact that they have to stick the adjective "compassionate" in front of the word "conservatism" implies that conservatism isn't generally considered compassionate.

...just another empty slogan to get elected, but its main use was just for advertising purposes.

ashaman1324
26th December 2008, 05:53
10% huh? Its interesting that the percentage of people who actively supportted the American revolution, was around 10% of the population...
interesting...
it wont really matter though since communism is kinda a black word in america, at least where i live.
anarchism isn't taken as seriously as it should be.
socialism is seen as the exact same as communism.

KC
26th December 2008, 06:16
10% huh? Its interesting that the percentage of people who actively supportted the American revolution, was around 10% of the population...

Interestingly, I believe in 1924 the CP in the USSR was about 10% of the total population.

Pawn Power
26th December 2008, 06:55
10% huh? Its interesting that the percentage of people who actively supportted the American revolution, was around 10% of the population...


Interestingly, I believe in 1924 the CP in the USSR was about 10% of the total population.

In response to what she had learned in the Holocaust, Susan Sontag said that 10 percent of any population is cruel, no matter what, and that 10 percent is merciful, no matter what. It is the remaining 80 percent which could be moved in either direction.

GPDP
26th December 2008, 07:42
In response to what she had learned in the Holocaust, Susan Sontag said that 10 percent of any population is cruel, no matter what, and that 10 percent is merciful, no matter what. It is the remaining 80 percent which could be moved in either direction.

So, basically, the extreme right and the far left make up 20% of the population, and each 10% vies for the support of the other 80%?

Yeah, that sounds about right.

Reclaimed Dasein
27th December 2008, 09:30
He and other members of his exalted class will spare them not a second of their time. This is otherwise known as "compassionate conservatism."
The problem is they can't see it and we haven't been able to force them to see it. I'm not sure how we can do it right now, but we should somehow force a clear recognition of these problems by the elite. This way they can't claim "I didn't know."

fabiansocialist
27th December 2008, 09:53
The problem is they can't see it and we haven't been able to force them to see it. I'm not sure how we can do it right now, but we should somehow force a clear recognition of these problems by the elite. This way they can't claim "I didn't know."

This can only be done at gunpoint.Not appealing to their better nature (they don't have one). The people at the top are sociopaths.

griffjam
28th December 2008, 21:13
steal your food

Pawn Power
28th December 2008, 22:35
steal your food

Take over food production and distribution.