Log in

View Full Version : Fidel reflects on the DPRK



Honggweilo
8th December 2008, 17:46
Reflections of Fidel Castro about Korea
Cuban Revolution leader Fidel Castro examined events that led to the split of the Korean nation into two states in his latest reflection, published by Granma daily on Wednesday.
The two Koreas

by Fidel Castro Ruz
http://www.korea-is-one.org/IMG/jpg/fidelcastro4.jpg The Korean nation, with its unique culture that differentiates it from its Chinese and Japanese neighbors, has existed for three thousand years. These characteristics are typical of societies in that Asian region, including those of China, Vietnam and others. There is nothing like it in Western cultures, some of which are less than 250 years old.
In the war of 1894, the Japanese had seized from China its control over the Korean dynasty and turned its territory into a Japanese colony. Protestantism was introduced into this country in the year 1892, following an agreement between the United States and the Korean authorities.
On the other hand, Catholicism was introduced in the same century by missionaries. It is estimated that today in South Korea, around 25 percent of the population is Christian and a similar percentage is Buddhist. The philosophy of Confucius had a great influence on the spirit of Koreans, who are not characterized by fanatical religious practices.
Two important figures stand out in that nation’s political life in the 20th century: Syngman Rhee, born in March of 1875, and Kim Il Sung, born 37 years later in April of 1912. Both personalities, of different social background, confronted each other due to historical circumstances that had nothing to do with either of them.
The Christians opposed the Japanese colonial system. One of them was Syngman Rhee, who was an actively practicing Protestant. Korea changed its status: Japan annexed its territory in 1910. Years later, in 1919, Rhee was appointed president of the provisional government in exile, headquartered in Shanghai, China. He never used weapons against the invaders. The League of Nations in Geneva paid no attention to him.
The Japanese Empire was brutally repressive with the Korean population. The patriots took up arms against the Japanese colonialist policy and succeeded in liberating a small area in the mountain region of the north at the end of the 1890’s.
Kin Il Sung, born in the vicinity of Pyongyang, joined the Korean Communist guerrillas to fight the Japanese at the age of 18. In his active revolutionary life, he attained the position of political and military leader of the anti-Japanese combatants in North Korea, at the young age of 33.
During World War II, the United States decided the fate of Korea in the post-war period. It joined the conflict when it was attacked by one of its own creatures, the Empire of the Rising Sun, whose tight feudal gates were opened by Commodore Perry in the first half of the 19th century, aiming his cannons at the strange Asian country that refused to trade with America.
The outstanding disciple later became a powerful rival, as I have already explained on another occasion. Decades later, Japan successively struck at China and Russia, additionally taking over Korea. Nevertheless it was an astute ally for the victors of World War I, at the expense of China. It amassed forces and, transformed into the Asian version of fascist Nazism, attempted to occupy Chinese territory in 1937 and attacked the United States in December of 1941; it brought the war to Southeast Asia and Oceania.
The colonial domains of Britain, France, Holland and Portugal in the region were doomed and the United States emerged as the most powerful country in the world, matched only by the Soviet Union then destroyed by World War II and by the heavy material and human losses resulting from the Nazi attack. The Chinese Revolution was about to conclude in 1945 when the world massacre ceased. The united anti-Japanese combat was taking up its energy then.
Mao, Ho Chi Minh, Gandhi, Sukarno and other leaders later carried on the fight against the restoration of the old world order which was already unsustainable. Truman dropped the nuclear bomb on two civilian Japanese cities; this was a terribly destructive new weapon whose existence they had not reported to their Soviet ally, as has been explained, one which had been the major contributor to the destruction of fascism.
Nothing justified the genocide committed, not even the fact that the tenacious Japanese resistance had taken the lives of almost 15,000 American soldiers on the Japanese island of Okinawa. Japan was already defeated, and that weapon, had it been dropped on a military target, would have sooner or later had the same demoralizing effect on the Japanese military machine without any more casualties among U.S. soldiers. It was an act of indescribable terror.
Soviet soldiers were advancing on Manchuria and North Korea, just as they had promised when fighting ceased in Europe. The allies had defined beforehand the point each army could reach. The dividing line would be in the middle of Korea, equidistant between the Yalu River and the southern end of the peninsula.
The U.S. government negotiated with the Japanese the rules that would govern the surrendering of troops on their own territory. Japan would be occupied by the United States. In Korea, annexed to Japan, a large force of the powerful Japanese army would remain. South of the 38th Parallel, the established dividing line, U.S. interests prevailed.
Syngman Rhee, reincorporated into that part of the territory by the U.S. government, was the leader the Americans supported, with the open cooperation of the Japanese. That is how he won the hard-fought election of 1948. That year, the soldiers of the Soviet Army had pulled out of North Korea.
On June 25, 1950 war broke out in the country. It is still unclear who fired the first shot, whether it was the combatants in the North or the American soldiers on duty with soldiers recruited by Rhee. The argument does not make any sense if one analyzes it from the Korean angle. Kim Il Sung’s soldiers fought against the Japanese for the liberation of all Korea. His armies advanced irrepressibly to the far reaches to the South where the Yankees were defending themselves with the massive back-up of their fighter planes.
Seoul and other cities had been occupied. MacArthur, commander-in-chief of U.S. forces in the Pacific, decided to order a Marine landing at Incheon, at the rearguard of Northern forces which by then were in no condition to counterattack. Pyongyang fell into the hands of Yankee forces, preceded by devastating air strikes. That fostered the idea of the U.S. military command in the Pacific to occupy all of Korea, since the Peoples’ Liberation Army of China, lead by Mao Zedong had inflicted a resounding defeat on the pro-Yankee forces of Chiang Kai-shek, supplied and supported by the United States.
The entire continental and maritime territory of that great country had been recovered, with the exception of Taipei and other small near-by islands where Kuomintang forces found refuge after being transported there by vessels of the Sixth Fleet.
The history of what happened then is well known today. It should not be forgotten that Boris Yeltsin handed over to Washington the Soviet Union archives, among other things.
What did the United States do when the virtually inevitable conflict broke out under the premises created in Korea? It portrayed the northern part of that country as the aggressor.
The Security Council of the recently created United Nations Organization, promoted by the victorious powers of W. W. II, passed a resolution that none of the five members could veto.
Precisely in those months, the USSR had expressed its disagreement with the exclusion of China from the Security Council, where the United States was recognizing Chiang Kai-Shek, with less than 0.3 percent of national territory and less than 2 percent of the population, as a member of that Council and with a right to the veto.
Such arbitrariness led to the absence of the Russian delegate, with the result that the Council agreed to give the war the character of a UN military action against the alleged aggressor: the Peoples’ Republic of Korea. China, completely outside the conflict, which was affecting its unfinished fight for the total liberation of the country, saw the threat hovering directly against its own territory, this being unacceptable for its security.
According to public information, Prime Minister Zhou Enlai was sent to Moscow to inform Stalin of China’s point of view as to the inadmissibility of the presence of UN forces under U.S. command on the banks of the Yalu River which marks Korea’s border with China, and to request Soviet cooperation. At the time there were no profound contradictions between the two Socialist giants.
It has been affirmed that China’s response was planned for the October 13 and that Mao postponed it to the 19th, awaiting the Soviet reply. That was as long as he could put it off.
I intend to finish this reflection next Friday. It is a complex and laborious subject which requires special care and information that is as precise as possible. These are historical events that should be known and remembered.
On October 19, 1950, more than 400 thousand voluntary Chinese combatants, on orders from Mao Zedong, crossed the Yalu and waylaid the US troops that were advancing towards the Chinese border. The US units, surprised by the vigorous response of the country they had underestimated, were forced to withdraw towards a region near the southern coast, pushed back by the joint action of the Chinese and North Korean forces. Stalin, who was immensely cautious, offered far less support than Mao had anticipated, though the MiG-15 aircrafts piloted by the Soviets, over a limited 42.5-miles front, proved valuable help during the initial stage of the conflict in protecting land forces during their intrepid advance. Pyongyang was again recovered and Seoul re-occupied once more, attempting to fight back the incessant onslaught of the US Air Force, the most powerful which has ever existed.
McArthur was anxious to attack China with nuclear weapons. He called for their use following the shameful defeat they had tasted. President Truman saw no other choice but to dismiss him from his command and appoint General Matthews Ridgeway head of US air, sea and land forces in the theatre of operations. Next to the United States, the United Kingdom, France, the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Greece, Canada, Turkey, Ethiopia, South Africa, the Philippines, Australia, New Zealand, Thailand and Colombia took part in the imperialist adventure. Colombia, then under the unitary government of conservative Laureano Gómez, who was responsible for the mass slaughter of peasants, was the only Latin American country involved. As we said, the Ethiopia of Haile Selassie, where slavery still existed, and a South Africa still under the domination of white racists, also took part in the invasion.
It had been scarcely five years since the world slaughter that began in September 1939 had come to an end, on August 1945. Following bloody combat in Korean territory, Parallel 38 once again became the border separating North and South. It is estimated that, in that war, about two million North Koreans, nearly half a million or one million Chinese and more than a million allied soldiers perished. Around 44 thousand US soldiers lost their lives. No few of them had been born in Puerto Rico or other Latin American countries, recruited to take part in a war they were driven to by their condition as poor immigrants.
Japan was to reap many benefits from the conflict. In a year’s time, industrial output grew by 50 % and, within two years, it again reached pre-war production levels. What didn’t change, however, was how the acts of genocide perpetrated by China’s imperial troops in Korea were perceived. The governments of Japan have paid tribute to the acts of genocide carried out by their soldiers, which, in China, had raped tens of thousands of women and brutally murdered hundreds of thousands of people, as was explained in a reflection.
Hard-working and tenacious, the Japanese have transformed their country, bereft of oil and other important raw materials, into the second most powerful economy in the world.
Japan’s GDP, measured in capitalist terms, though the data varies across different Western sources, is today over 4.5 billion dollars, and the country has over one billion dollars in hard currency reserves. This is twice China’s GDP, of 2.2 billion, even though China has 50% more hard currency reserves than Japan. The GDP of the United States, of 12.4 billion dollars, for a country with 34.6 times more territory and 2.3 times Japan’s population, is only three times that of Japan. Its government is today one of imperialism’s main allies, at a time when it is threatened by economic recession and the sophisticated weapons of the superpower put at risk the entire human species.
These are historical lessons which cannot be forgotten.
The war, however, took a considerable toll on China. Truman instructed the 6th Fleet to prevent the landing of Chinese revolutionary forces that would achieve the complete emancipation of their country by reclaiming the 0.3 percent of their territory that had been occupied by the rest of the pro-Yankee forces of Chiang Kai-shek that had fled there.
Sino-Soviet relations were to deteriorate later, following the death of Stalin, on March 1953. The revolutionary movement splintered nearly everywhere. The dramatic call issued by Ho Chi Minh made evident the damage that had been done and imperialism, through its immense media apparatus, poked the fires of extremism among false revolutionary theoreticians, an area in which US intelligence agencies were to become experts.
Following the arbitrary division, North Korea had been dealt the most rugged part of the country. Each grain of food had to be reaped through sweat and sacrifice. Pyongyang, the capital, had been razed to the ground. Many, who had been wounded or mutilated during the war, were in need of medical attention. They were enduring a blockade and had no resources available. The Soviet Union and other countries of the socialist block were in the process of recovering from the war.
http://www.korea-is-one.org/IMG/jpg/Fidel_Castro_Kim_Il_Sung-2.jpgFidel Castro visits the People’s Study House with the president Kim Il Sun. When I arrived at the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea on March 7, 1986, nearly 33 years following the destruction caused by the war, it was still difficult to believe what had transpired there. That heroic people had constructed myriad things: large and small damns and canals to store water in, generate electricity, service cities and irrigate fields; Thermoelectric plants, large mechanical and other types of industries, many of them underground in the depths of the bedrock, all created through hard, methodical labor. Because of cooper and aluminum shortages, they had been forced to use iron to create electricity-guzzling transmission lines, iron which, in part, was produced from coal.
The capital and other cities that had been devastated were reconstructed, inch by inch. I estimated that millions of new homes had been built in urban and rural areas and that tens of thousands of other kinds of facilities had been set up. Countless hours of work were contained in stone, concrete, steel, wood, synthetic products and machinery. The fields I had the opportunity to see, wherever I went, looked like gardens. Well-dressed, organized and enthusiastic people were everywhere, ready to greet visitors. The country deserved cooperation and peace.
http://www.korea-is-one.org/IMG/jpg/Kim_Il_Sung_Fidel_Castro-2.jpg There was no issue I didn’t discuss with my illustrious host Kim Il Sung. I shall never forget this.
Korea was divided into two parts by an imaginary line. The South was to have a different experience. It was the more densely populated part and endured less destruction during the war. The presence of an enormous foreign military force required the supply of local manufactured and other products, from crafts to fresh fruits and vegetables, not to mention services. The military spending of the allies was huge. The same thing occurred when the United States decided to retain extensive military forces in the country indefinitely. During the Cold War, Western and Japanese transnationals invested considerable sums of money, siphoning out incalculable wealth from the sweat of South Koreans, a people who are as hard-working and industrious as their brothers in the North.
The great markets of the world were open to their products. They were not blockaded. Today, the country has high levels of technology and productivity. It has suffered the economic crises of the West, following which many South Korean companies were bought over by transnationals. The austere nature of its people has allowed the State to accumulate significant reserves in hard currency. Today, it is enduring the United States’ economic depression, particularly the high prices of oil and food, and the inflationary pressures from both.
South Korea’s GDP –787.6 billion dollars– is almost equal to that of Brazil (796 billion) and Mexico (768 billion), countries with abundant hydrocarbon reserves and incomparably larger populations. Imperialism imposed its system upon these nations. Two fell behind; the other made much more progress.
There is hardly any emigration from South Korea to the West. There is emigration en masse from Mexico to what is currently US territory. From Brazil, South and Central America, people emigrate everywhere, in search of employment and lured by consumerist propaganda. Today, they pay them back with rigorous and contemptuous laws.
The position of principles on nuclear weapons supported by Cuba within the Non-Aligned Movement, ratified during the Summit Conference held in Havana in August 2006, is well known.
I met the current leader of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Kim Jong Il, when I arrived at the Pyongyang airport. He was standing discretely beside his father, to one side of the red carpet. Cuba maintains excellent relations with his government.
When the Soviet Union and the socialist block collapsed, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea lost important markets and sources of oil, raw materials and equipment. As in Cuba’s case, the consequences were severe. The progress that had been attained through great sacrifices was at risk. In spite of this, they showed themselves capable of constructing a nuclear weapon.
When the nuclear test was conducted around a year ago, we conveyed the government of North Korea our points of view on the damage this could cause poor Third World countries that were waging an unequal and difficult battle against imperialist designs, at a decisive moment for the world. It might not have been necessary. Kim Song Il, at that point, had already decided, beforehand, what he had to do, mindful of the geographic and strategic characteristics of the region.
We are pleased to see North Korea’s declaration on its intentions of suspending its nuclear weapons program. This has nothing to do with the crimes and the blackmail of Bush, who now touts the declaration as proof of the success of his policy of genocide. North Korea’s gesture was not aimed at the government of the United States, before which it never budged an inch, but, rather, at China, a neighboring ally, whose security and development is vital for the two States.
Third World countries are interested in the friendship and cooperation between China and the two Koreas, whose union need not be from coast to coast, as was the case of Germany, today a US ally in NATO. Step by step, unhurriedly but indefatigably, as befits their culture and history, they shall continue to knit the bonds that will unite the two Koreas. With South Korea, we are developing more and more ties. With North Korea, these have always existed and we shall continue to strengthen them.

http://www.korea-is-one.org/spip.php?article3112

Asoka89
8th December 2008, 17:53
I support the Castro government and hopefully this piece was just an opportunist attempt to continue smooth relations with North Korea, but a real revolutionary would have attacked the gross attacks on human welfare in Korea, the presence of a fascist military state there, the disparities between the goverening elites and the military elites and the common people, the alienation and oppression in that society.


Much evil has been done in the guise of anti-imperialism, let's not forget that Fidel, for all the good he has done in Cuba and with Cuban internationalist efforts, supported Soviet repression in Prague 1968.

REDSOX
8th December 2008, 18:25
Fidel castro did not explicitly support the invasion of czechlosovakia nor did he specificlly condemn it. He took a middle way regretting the need for intervention but in the final analysis accepting it was needed to prevent capitalist restoration. He also made clear however that the soviets were practicing double standards on the one hand supporting intervention with tanks in czechlosovakia but not sending tanks to vietnam to help the NLF fight the yankees. What other realistic option did castro have? If he had condmmed it like i think he wanted to the soviets would have cut of all aid and it would have been goodbye cuba. That is the reality castro faced comrades. As for his views on North korea well i peronally defend north korea against imperialism though like castro i suspect i dont have much time for the bureaucratic caste who run this deformed workers state

Yehuda Stern
8th December 2008, 18:41
I support the Castro government and hopefully this piece was just an opportunist attempt to continue smooth relations with North Korea

You support Castro, but recognize his defense of the monstrous regime in the DPRK and that he supported the suppression of the revolution in Czechoslovakia. Aren't being just a bit hypocritical, here?

Wakizashi the Bolshevik
8th December 2008, 19:03
Of course he defends the DPRK! Both Cuba as North Korea are Socialist Worker's nations!

REDSOX
8th December 2008, 19:28
Cuba is definately a workers and farmers state with no privileged bureacratic caste.

North korea is a deformed workers state with a nationalied planned economy but ruled by a privileged bureaucratic caste

Vietnam is a degenetrated workers state as is china

Revy
8th December 2008, 19:47
He only mentions Kim Jong-il a whopping one time. Unusual that something so relevant (him being the current dictator with mandatory worship across North Korea) would be left out in such a blatant way.

And the construction? How does he explain that Pyongyang does not even have traffic lights?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sYR43hSdYw

Anyway, thanks for the history lesson, Fidel. :castro:

Coggeh
8th December 2008, 19:53
Christ that job must be hard , what if you were hungover or something ...:mellow:

REDSOX:

Cuba is definately a workers and farmers state with no privileged bureacratic caste.

North korea is a deformed workers state with a nationalied planned economy but ruled by a privileged bureaucratic caste

Vietnam is a degenetrated workers state as is china

How did you manage to come to that conclusion .....

REDSOX
8th December 2008, 20:10
In Cuba capitalism has esentially been abolished yes i know there are remnants ie tourism joint ventures etc but they play no independent role in cuba. The workers and farmers rule cuba and they elect their representives to parliament who are totally accountable to them. No major decisions ar taken without consulting the workers and farmers who have the final say. No one lives in privilege in Cuba. That comrade is a workers and farmers govt.

In north korea everything is decided from above with no worker input

Led Zeppelin
8th December 2008, 20:12
How did you manage to come to that conclusion .....

Probably by rolling a dice.

Revy
8th December 2008, 20:21
In Cuba capitalism has esentially been abolished yes i know there are remnants ie tourism joint ventures etc but they play no independent role in cuba. The workers and farmers rule cuba and they elect their representives to parliament who are totally accountable to them. No major decisions ar taken without consulting the workers and farmers who have the final say. No one lives in privilege in Cuba. That comrade is a workers and farmers govt.

In north korea everything is decided from above with no worker input

I've not seen evidence that Cuba is anything other than state capitalist.
Most "Cuba Truth" websites focus on statistics revolving around poverty and literacy. That's nice, but I'd like to see evidence that workers really have control over the means of production.

So it's a social democracy? yay?:glare:

REDSOX
8th December 2008, 20:26
How can Cuba be state capitalist when it has a planned economy. To have capitalism of any kind state or private it must operate under what che guevara called the law of value, ie the anarchy of the market place!!!

REDSOX
8th December 2008, 20:30
Stancel you seem to start from the premise that the interests of cuba's leaders and the workers and farmers are different. They are not stancel. The anology i would use is that a body needs a head provided the head is accountable to the body and acts in the interests of the body

Nothing Human Is Alien
8th December 2008, 20:55
This is old news. These reflections came out quite a long time ago. I posted them here (http://www.revleft.com/vb/showthread.php?t=85040&highlight=koreas+fidel).

Incidentally, all the old bogus arguments being hashed against Cuba in this thread have been answered here before as well (many times). Anyone interested could do a search.

hugsandmarxism
8th December 2008, 21:06
Stancel- I think the NK traffic ladies look cute in their powder blue uniforms :laugh: Those shoes must be a pain though... poor dears...

(btw: i don't mean to seem sexist or patriarchal)

Jorge Miguel
8th December 2008, 21:50
In Cuba capitalism has esentially been abolished yes i know there are remnants ie tourism joint ventures etc but they play no independent role in cuba. The workers and farmers rule cuba and they elect their representives to parliament who are totally accountable to them. No major decisions ar taken without consulting the workers and farmers who have the final say. No one lives in privilege in Cuba. That comrade is a workers and farmers govt.

In north korea everything is decided from above with no worker inputhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_North_Korea

Where is the evidence of worker input in Cuba?

Jorge Miguel
8th December 2008, 21:51
How does he explain that Pyongyang does not even have traffic lights?
Are traffic lights the deciding factor of the nature of the DPRK?

Perhaps traffic lights are not essential?

Nothing Human Is Alien
8th December 2008, 22:36
Where is the evidence of worker input in Cuba?

American vs. Cuban democracy (http://www.newhumanist.com/geiser.html)
Participation is key to Cuba’s democracy (http://www.cuba-solidarity.org/cubasi_article.asp?ArticleID=50)
Five reasons why the people rule (http://www.cuba-solidarity.org/cubasi_article.asp?ArticleID=53)
The workers key participants in revolution (http://www.greenleft.org.au/2008/764/39461)

JimmyJazz
8th December 2008, 23:04
You support Castro, but recognize his defense of the monstrous regime in the DPRK and that he supported the suppression of the revolution in Czechoslovakia. Aren't being just a bit hypocritical, here?

You don't support Castro? :confused: I thought I'd seen you defend focoism at length.

Sendo
9th December 2008, 01:54
good thoughts, diplomatic, without spouting idealistic lies about the North or trashing the Southerners as pieces of shit, addresses problems of post-USSR collapse and acknowledges the dangers with nuclear tech. I don't see it changing the opinions of anyone in the mainstream though. Overall, not one of Fidel's interesting reads. A little boring.

bootleg42
9th December 2008, 04:21
I don't think you all understood this one too well. He was taking a shit on U.S. imperialism more than anything.

He was being respectful to North Korea and he was praising what the people of the country did though he did not give props to it's dictator for such work, as he chose his words wisely considering that he needs to have diplomatic respect.

Maybe if you all knew and read the spanish version, you would catch that. At least that's what I got out of it.

Yehuda Stern
9th December 2008, 15:57
You don't support Castro? http://www.revleft.com/vb/../revleft/smilies/confused1.gif I thought I'd seen you defend focoism at length.You should consult an eye doctor, then. Or alternatively, a thought doctor.

Wanted Man
10th December 2008, 02:05
I support the Castro government and hopefully this piece was just an opportunist attempt to continue smooth relations with North Korea, but a real revolutionary would have attacked the gross attacks on human welfare in Korea, the presence of a fascist military state there, the disparities between the goverening elites and the military elites and the common people, the alienation and oppression in that society.
How can it be "an opportunist attempt to continue smooth relations" when it's just a reflection by Fidel? Unless one actually believes that Fidel is (still) the all-powerful one-man dictator, and his words make and break people and relations. :rolleyes:

It's an interesting piece on Korea's history and present, and it discusses the relations between Cuba and the DPRK, which have been 100% based on solidarity and mutual understanding for half a century. But hey, any guy on RevLeft can pass judgement on this fact: "that's baaaad..."

JimmyJazz
10th December 2008, 04:17
You should consult an eye doctor, then. Or alternatively, a thought doctor.

I did what I should have done in the first place and searched for your posts containing the word "guerrilla". I think I've just seen you participate vigorously in those debates and somehow in my mind I flipped it so you were on the other side (so yes, it's a thought doctor and not an eye doctor).

Nothing Human Is Alien
11th December 2008, 09:34
Comrades may be interested in this: Communist perspectives on Korea (http://powr-prm.org/communistsonkorea.html)