Log in

View Full Version : History Lesson for Those Ignorant Communist - ....Barbarism



Ghost Writer
27th July 2003, 07:38
I was recently challenged by someone who disagreed with my assertion that communists acted as cannibals during the Bolshevik Uprising. I thought it was significant enough to warrant its own thread. The following is his response to my calling Bolsheviks cannibals, and my history lesson to the ignorant.


Tell me where do you get these completely stupid thoughts from? It is obviously false yet you still say such rubbish? I realise that a lot of the time you are being sarcastic, unless you are insane, but I still wonder where you get it from?

You are an idiot. It would be wise for you to learn the history of the politics you subscribe to. Any moron should be able to deduce that I did not mean cannibalism in the literal sense, but rather a figurative sense. If anyone wishes to understand what was meant by my statement, I suggest reading the 25 page document, "Workers' Unrest and the Bosheviks' Response in 1919" (http://www.angelfire.com/nb/revhist17/brovkin2large.pdf), by Vladimir Brovkin. This essay appeared in the Slavic Review, Volume 49, Issue 3.

Basically, what it says is that following the October Revolution, which most workers supported in solidarity with their socialist counterparts, degraded into widespread discontent of the workers, due to poor treatment and mismanagement by the commissars.

At this time, the Bolsheviks Reds were actively involved in fighting a civil war against the Whites. The period between 1917-1921 marked a time of peasant uprisings, and general strikes, by people who felt that the Bolsheviks were betraying the workers, who used their namesake as justification for their revolution. Poor rationing, and the suspension of free-elections of factory management left them with bitter feelings that moved them to express their anger in gradually increasing levels. Further ignoring the demands of the people led to widespread disillusionment.

These groups of workers where classified as Mensheviks, Leftist SR's, and White Guardist conspirators. Thus, the Bolshevik leadership lumped them into the classification of the enemy they were fighting, and treated them accordingly. Wide-scale arrests, reduction of rations, and mass executions were the result. To conclude, this document supports my assertion that communists have acted in a cannibalistic manner in the past, specifically following the October Revolution.

Many of the people killed in this time frame were supporters of the original revolution that had felt betrayed by power-seeking revolutionaries that viewed a dictatorship of the proletariat as a dictatorship by them, and only them. The effect was to further alienate a larger population by 1921. What followed from this was the need to further quell elements that had become hostile to the new regime. This time period started the precedent of labeling subversives, that later evolved into denouncing the opposition as enemies of the people, saboteurs, and hidden enemies used by Stalin during his purges.

If you want to know of further accounts of Bolshevik barbarism, research their use of enemy mutilation. Many times the bodies of civilian men, women, and children were mutilated and left hanging as a warning to other subversives. To them it wasn't enough to leave a pile of bodies in the cities they took, but sometimes they had to resort to the most despicable acts of warfare, which is to desecrate your enemies body. Communists are truly sickening creatures.

(Edited by Ghost Writer at 7:41 am on July 27, 2003)

elijahcraig
27th July 2003, 08:54
There were reports of cannibalism, but that was because millions were starving. I doubt the "communists" as in Bolsheviks did though.

Loknar
27th July 2003, 18:55
You dont have to be white or red to be hungary. the Russian people wanted Communism because they were sick of the Tsar, a transition is never easy. Russia at this time was in very bad shape. WW1 was happening and so was the civil war. I dont blame the Commies for the famine.

(Edited by Loknar at 6:58 pm on July 27, 2003)

Hampton
27th July 2003, 20:54
The early colonists dug up dead bodies and ate them when they weren't able to find any food and they kept the scalps of murdered indians and their mutiliated body parts sometimes making hats out of them as well as using the dried skin of Nat Turner to make a handbags or something of the sort. If American society is founded on this, who are you to judge?

Loknar
27th July 2003, 20:57
Well I could care less about Nat Turner for the crap he did. I dont have a problem with him rising up, but killing infants and women makes him a scum bag in my mind.

Ghost Writer
28th July 2003, 05:13
"I dont blame the Commies for the famine."

Nor do I. It is how they reacted to the famine, and the political strife that it caused that I take issue with. I take that back. There were many "reforms" that crippled businesses, further amplifying the existing famine. Their policies, which lack good economic considerations, contributed heavily to the famine. Communists can not answer the fundamental questions that all economic systems must answer.

(Edited by Ghost Writer at 5:15 am on July 28, 2003)

Hampton
28th July 2003, 08:19
Quote: from Loknar on 3:57 pm on July 28, 2003
Well I could care less about Nat Turner for the crap he did. I dont have a problem with him rising up, but killing infants and women makes him a scum bag in my mind.


Well when you see your daughters raped, family sold off to auction, and know that you have to die to be free I'm sure the rage and anger overcomes you and makes you not in the right mindset.

Vinny Rafarino
28th July 2003, 09:11
What "crippled businesses" do you speak of Ghos Wanker?

Pre Soviet Russia was a fuedalistic society based almost 100% in agriculture.

There were no "businesses" to cripple.

Ghost Writer
28th July 2003, 09:41
Read the link I provided for you, dipshit. Then you may get an idea of how communists cripple businesses. I know 25 pages is a lot for somebody who can hardly think, but do give it a try, old man.

suffianr
28th July 2003, 15:57
Another misguided attempt at deconstructing history, GW?

You want the scoop on barbarism? Atrocities?

Read Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee by Dee Brown. Look at your own filthy backyard before you start thinking about pissing in someone else's, GW, especially about the part where the American government starts distributing free blankets, "Cholera Ward" blankets to Native Indians as a gesture of peace before the onslaught of winter.

Or read about the massacre at Khalistan, Punjab, on June 3, 1984, when Indian soldiers killed 20,000 Sikhsat the Golden Temple in Amritsar, and 38 other shrines in the state. In the space of four days.

Yes, you don't need to look too far back into history to realize that any field of human conflict is not without it's own sordid lessons. Of course, owing to the fact that you're a sworn enemy of the Left, I'd sooner believe that you're only willing to point out your opponents atrocities sooner than your own.

Now aren't you a predictable one? :)

Loknar
28th July 2003, 20:27
Quote: from Hampton on 8:19 am on July 28, 2003

Quote: from Loknar on 3:57 pm on July 28, 2003
Well I could care less about Nat Turner for the crap he did. I dont have a problem with him rising up, but killing infants and women makes him a scum bag in my mind.


Well when you see your daughters raped, family sold off to auction, and know that you have to die to be free I'm sure the rage and anger overcomes you and makes you not in the right mindset.


I agree here. Like I said, the man had every right to rise up and kill his owner. I just think that killing the other family members is wrong.

elijahcraig
28th July 2003, 23:59
The children..yes...the women...no. They are equals, they are just as responsible.

Ghost Writer
30th July 2003, 19:49
I'd sooner believe that you're only willing to point out your opponents atrocities sooner than your own.

Please explain to me how the U.S. government's policy with respect to American Indians during the 19th century is my atrocity? Please show me were I condoned using biological warfare on any enemy? In fact, if you did you're homework you would find that I wrote up an account of the Colorado Sand Creek Massacre. Just because the U.S. government committed atrocities in the past does not make me culpable as a supporter of the current system. The difference here lies in the fact that my nations philosophy has changed to more accurately represent the original ideas that founded this nation, which were noble, I might add; where as, your philosophy continues to murder millions of people. In addition, the actions taken against the American Indian were inconsistent with the philosophy I hold dear. While the deaths attributed to Marxism are fully consistent with the ideology you still support.

It is you who are predictable.