Blibblob
23rd July 2003, 21:48
I recieved this from somebody I know through email. I don't see how choice or anything pulls into matter here. The woman can't speak, how can she choose anything, and I think that's what Jeb is trying to draw on, by appointing somebody to be her legal gardian to make choices for her. What the fuck kind of freedom is this?
Via Workers World News Service
Reprinted from the May 29, 2003
issue of Workers World newspaper
-------------------------
SHE'S DISABLED, RAPED AND PREGNANT, BUT ...
JEB BUSH DEMANDS, "PROTECT THE FETUS"
By Leslie Feinberg
It's hard to imagine a more vulnerable young person for Florida Gov. Jeb
Bush to offer up as a sacrifice to the ultra-right strategy of
abolishing women's reproductive rights.
She is 22 and publicy identified only as JDS. She is severely
developmentally disabled and autistic. JDS lives with cerebral palsy and
seizure disorder. She cannot speak. She can't stand or take a step
without assistance. She weighs only 88 pounds.
She has been institutionalized in a small state-licensed group facility
in southwest Orlando for 19 years, where she reportedly slept on a bed
in an open hallway next to a bathroom. (Orlando Sentinel, May 16)
In April, say officials of the Department of Children and Families, they
discovered she was approximately five months pregnant. She is unable to
consent to sexual intercourse. Her pregnancy is a result of rape.
Doctors stress that her disabilities are multiple and severe, making
this a high-risk pregnancy that endangers her life.
In early May, DCF officials asked an Orange County
circuit judge to appoint two guardians--one for the woman, the other for
her fetus. But on May 12, officials retracted the request for a fetal
guardian, acknowledging that a landmark 1989 Florida Supreme Court
decision had ruled such an appeal "clearly improper."
The very next day, Gov. Bush--who is consistent in opposing a woman's
right to control her own body--publicly intervened. He ordered state
lawyers to fight for one guardian only--for the fetus.
The National Organization for Women, Center for Reproductive Rights and
the American Civil Liberties Union immediately filed a brief asking the
court to reject Bush's move.
A June 2 hearing has been set to determine JDS's competency. Soon after
June 2, a guardianship hearing will take place. There, Bush has vowed to
push state officials to ask a judge to appoint a "guardian" for the
fetus.
Pro-choice activists are angered at these attempts to keep the case
moving slowly through the courts. After the sixth month, an abortion
will no longer be a legal alternative in the state.
ROE VS. WADE IN THE CROSS HAIRS
A decision in this case would not result in the wholesale elimination of
Roe vs. Wade--the hard-won 1973 Supreme Court decision legalizing
abortion.
But it is the use of the courts to make an end-run around Roe, while
avoiding a direct assault on the law that could ignite mass protests.
This reactionary tactic is sharply focused in Gov. Bush's carefully
crafted language.
"Given the facts of this case, it is entirely appropriate that an
advocate be appointed to represent the unborn child's best interests in
all decisions," he said in a May 13 statement. "This is a tragic case
about a mom who cannot make decisions for herself," he said on May 15.
A pregnant woman is not a "mom" until she bears a child. A fetus becomes
a child at birth.
This is the second attempt nationally in recent weeks to set a legal
precedent to establish the "personhood" of a fetus.
In April, Jeb Bush's brother in the White House, plus members of
Congress, tried to manipulate the public horror and rage generated by
the apparent murder of a pregnant woman in California--Laci Peterson.
They used her death to press for congressional passage of the "Unborn
Victims of Violence Act." This bill would make a fetus a separate
"person" from the woman carrying it--making a fetus the woman's legal
adversary.
This legislation would extend to the womb 14th Amendment protections to
life, liberty or property that women themselves do not automatically
have.
It was conservative men, of the same stripe as those now arguing for
legislation to "protect" the fetus, who killed the Equal Rights
Amendment that would have provided equal protection to women under the
law.
One such legislator is Sen. Orrin Hatch, a very conservative Republican
from Utah. Speaking approvingly of the "Unborn Victims" bill, he said of
its critics, "They say it undermines abortion rights. It does." (BBC
News, May 15)
DISABILITY RIGHTS?
The shocking insensitivity to JDS's body and life also illuminates
conditions for disabled people in this country.
Her potentially life-threatening pregnancy requires careful monitoring
of her health, but even JDS's court-appointed lawyer doesn't know what
kind of care she's getting--if any.
Rod Taylor, her sole official advocate at this point, said he "doesn't
know what kind of medical attention she's receiving beyond her daily
medication and vitamins." (Orlando Sentinel, May 19)
Carla Josephson, president of the Orlando-area chapter of the National
Organization for Women, questioned how the state could provide complete
medical care for JDS and other disabled people if they have no
guardians.
"What kind of medical care was she getting all along?" Josephine asked.
A month after JDS's pregnancy was confirmed, the state has still not
found her a guardian with the legal power to make life-or-death
decisions--despite a court document stating that she is in "imminent
danger."
Pressed by the Sentinel, officials revealed that JDS is one of 857
developmentally disabled adults in Florida's state-licensed group homes
who have no legal guardian.
Tallahassee lawyer Lance Block says it doesn't look like the DCF has
learned anything since he represented a developmentally disabled young
woman who became pregnant after being raped in a state home 12 years
ago. The DCF left the woman without a guardian in the home for three
months, near her rapist--the home operator's son.
But even after the high-profile exposure of the abuse of JDS, the May 19
Sentinel article concludes, "For now, DCF says it has no immediate plans
to change its rules or call for changing the law governing its
practices."
'PRO-LIFE'? THEY GOTTA BE KIDDING!
The right-wing of the national political establishment views Florida as
an ideal battleground to wage war against women's reproductive rights.
Its "pro-life" governor helped deliver his anti-choice brother to the
Oval Office by disenfranchising Black voters.
Now the Bush brothers and members of both parties of big business are
pushing to roll back the right to abortion under the slogan "right to
life."
NOT JDS'S LIFE.
And certainly not the rights of women and children as a whole.
A zealous crusade against lesbians and gays was waged by orange-juice
industry figurehead Anita Bryant in 1977 under the cynical banner "Save
Our Children." The result was a ban in Florida on lesbian and gay
adoption and foster parenting.
The "Scarlet Letter Law," now in the process of being repealed, was
enacted by the state in October 2001, penned by state Sen. Walter
Campbell--a Democrat, it's worth noting. It required that a pregnant
woman of any age who planned to give up her baby for adoption must pay
for ads to publish her name and descriptions of all her sexual partners
over a 12-month period in the newspaper--even in cases of rape and
incest. The rationale given was that the father would then be able to
claim the child.
The right wing's "we care about children" campaign is a deliberate
distraction. It portrays poor women as villains when in fact they face
especially difficult decisions about having children in this period of
dwindling jobs and deteriorating living conditions.
Politicians from both parties, with the backing of their right-wing
patrons, have succeeded in abolishing welfare, which offered minimal
sustenance to women and children impoverished under capitalism. After
having minimized taxes on the rich, they claim there's not enough money
for programs like Medicaid. That is already translating into less pre-
natal care and medical access for poor children. Education is on the
chopping block. Day care is less available and priced out of reach.
Many of the social programs important to women were won during the last
period of progressive mass action in the 1960s and 1970s, when the
militancy of the anti-war and civil rights struggles, along with
national liberation movements around the world, helped spark mass
movements for women's and gay liberation as well. The huge anti-war
mobilizations of the past year, which have been even more diverse than
back then, give promise that a new social movement has begun that can
turn back the right-wing offensive and win new and stronger rights for
women.
- END -
(Copyright Workers World Service: Everyone is permitted to copy and
distribute verbatim copies of this document, but changing it is not
allowed. For more information contact Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY,
NY 10011; via e-mail: [email protected] Subscribe wwnews-
[email protected] Unsubscribe [email protected] Support the
voice of resistance http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php)
Via Workers World News Service
Reprinted from the May 29, 2003
issue of Workers World newspaper
-------------------------
SHE'S DISABLED, RAPED AND PREGNANT, BUT ...
JEB BUSH DEMANDS, "PROTECT THE FETUS"
By Leslie Feinberg
It's hard to imagine a more vulnerable young person for Florida Gov. Jeb
Bush to offer up as a sacrifice to the ultra-right strategy of
abolishing women's reproductive rights.
She is 22 and publicy identified only as JDS. She is severely
developmentally disabled and autistic. JDS lives with cerebral palsy and
seizure disorder. She cannot speak. She can't stand or take a step
without assistance. She weighs only 88 pounds.
She has been institutionalized in a small state-licensed group facility
in southwest Orlando for 19 years, where she reportedly slept on a bed
in an open hallway next to a bathroom. (Orlando Sentinel, May 16)
In April, say officials of the Department of Children and Families, they
discovered she was approximately five months pregnant. She is unable to
consent to sexual intercourse. Her pregnancy is a result of rape.
Doctors stress that her disabilities are multiple and severe, making
this a high-risk pregnancy that endangers her life.
In early May, DCF officials asked an Orange County
circuit judge to appoint two guardians--one for the woman, the other for
her fetus. But on May 12, officials retracted the request for a fetal
guardian, acknowledging that a landmark 1989 Florida Supreme Court
decision had ruled such an appeal "clearly improper."
The very next day, Gov. Bush--who is consistent in opposing a woman's
right to control her own body--publicly intervened. He ordered state
lawyers to fight for one guardian only--for the fetus.
The National Organization for Women, Center for Reproductive Rights and
the American Civil Liberties Union immediately filed a brief asking the
court to reject Bush's move.
A June 2 hearing has been set to determine JDS's competency. Soon after
June 2, a guardianship hearing will take place. There, Bush has vowed to
push state officials to ask a judge to appoint a "guardian" for the
fetus.
Pro-choice activists are angered at these attempts to keep the case
moving slowly through the courts. After the sixth month, an abortion
will no longer be a legal alternative in the state.
ROE VS. WADE IN THE CROSS HAIRS
A decision in this case would not result in the wholesale elimination of
Roe vs. Wade--the hard-won 1973 Supreme Court decision legalizing
abortion.
But it is the use of the courts to make an end-run around Roe, while
avoiding a direct assault on the law that could ignite mass protests.
This reactionary tactic is sharply focused in Gov. Bush's carefully
crafted language.
"Given the facts of this case, it is entirely appropriate that an
advocate be appointed to represent the unborn child's best interests in
all decisions," he said in a May 13 statement. "This is a tragic case
about a mom who cannot make decisions for herself," he said on May 15.
A pregnant woman is not a "mom" until she bears a child. A fetus becomes
a child at birth.
This is the second attempt nationally in recent weeks to set a legal
precedent to establish the "personhood" of a fetus.
In April, Jeb Bush's brother in the White House, plus members of
Congress, tried to manipulate the public horror and rage generated by
the apparent murder of a pregnant woman in California--Laci Peterson.
They used her death to press for congressional passage of the "Unborn
Victims of Violence Act." This bill would make a fetus a separate
"person" from the woman carrying it--making a fetus the woman's legal
adversary.
This legislation would extend to the womb 14th Amendment protections to
life, liberty or property that women themselves do not automatically
have.
It was conservative men, of the same stripe as those now arguing for
legislation to "protect" the fetus, who killed the Equal Rights
Amendment that would have provided equal protection to women under the
law.
One such legislator is Sen. Orrin Hatch, a very conservative Republican
from Utah. Speaking approvingly of the "Unborn Victims" bill, he said of
its critics, "They say it undermines abortion rights. It does." (BBC
News, May 15)
DISABILITY RIGHTS?
The shocking insensitivity to JDS's body and life also illuminates
conditions for disabled people in this country.
Her potentially life-threatening pregnancy requires careful monitoring
of her health, but even JDS's court-appointed lawyer doesn't know what
kind of care she's getting--if any.
Rod Taylor, her sole official advocate at this point, said he "doesn't
know what kind of medical attention she's receiving beyond her daily
medication and vitamins." (Orlando Sentinel, May 19)
Carla Josephson, president of the Orlando-area chapter of the National
Organization for Women, questioned how the state could provide complete
medical care for JDS and other disabled people if they have no
guardians.
"What kind of medical care was she getting all along?" Josephine asked.
A month after JDS's pregnancy was confirmed, the state has still not
found her a guardian with the legal power to make life-or-death
decisions--despite a court document stating that she is in "imminent
danger."
Pressed by the Sentinel, officials revealed that JDS is one of 857
developmentally disabled adults in Florida's state-licensed group homes
who have no legal guardian.
Tallahassee lawyer Lance Block says it doesn't look like the DCF has
learned anything since he represented a developmentally disabled young
woman who became pregnant after being raped in a state home 12 years
ago. The DCF left the woman without a guardian in the home for three
months, near her rapist--the home operator's son.
But even after the high-profile exposure of the abuse of JDS, the May 19
Sentinel article concludes, "For now, DCF says it has no immediate plans
to change its rules or call for changing the law governing its
practices."
'PRO-LIFE'? THEY GOTTA BE KIDDING!
The right-wing of the national political establishment views Florida as
an ideal battleground to wage war against women's reproductive rights.
Its "pro-life" governor helped deliver his anti-choice brother to the
Oval Office by disenfranchising Black voters.
Now the Bush brothers and members of both parties of big business are
pushing to roll back the right to abortion under the slogan "right to
life."
NOT JDS'S LIFE.
And certainly not the rights of women and children as a whole.
A zealous crusade against lesbians and gays was waged by orange-juice
industry figurehead Anita Bryant in 1977 under the cynical banner "Save
Our Children." The result was a ban in Florida on lesbian and gay
adoption and foster parenting.
The "Scarlet Letter Law," now in the process of being repealed, was
enacted by the state in October 2001, penned by state Sen. Walter
Campbell--a Democrat, it's worth noting. It required that a pregnant
woman of any age who planned to give up her baby for adoption must pay
for ads to publish her name and descriptions of all her sexual partners
over a 12-month period in the newspaper--even in cases of rape and
incest. The rationale given was that the father would then be able to
claim the child.
The right wing's "we care about children" campaign is a deliberate
distraction. It portrays poor women as villains when in fact they face
especially difficult decisions about having children in this period of
dwindling jobs and deteriorating living conditions.
Politicians from both parties, with the backing of their right-wing
patrons, have succeeded in abolishing welfare, which offered minimal
sustenance to women and children impoverished under capitalism. After
having minimized taxes on the rich, they claim there's not enough money
for programs like Medicaid. That is already translating into less pre-
natal care and medical access for poor children. Education is on the
chopping block. Day care is less available and priced out of reach.
Many of the social programs important to women were won during the last
period of progressive mass action in the 1960s and 1970s, when the
militancy of the anti-war and civil rights struggles, along with
national liberation movements around the world, helped spark mass
movements for women's and gay liberation as well. The huge anti-war
mobilizations of the past year, which have been even more diverse than
back then, give promise that a new social movement has begun that can
turn back the right-wing offensive and win new and stronger rights for
women.
- END -
(Copyright Workers World Service: Everyone is permitted to copy and
distribute verbatim copies of this document, but changing it is not
allowed. For more information contact Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY,
NY 10011; via e-mail: [email protected] Subscribe wwnews-
[email protected] Unsubscribe [email protected] Support the
voice of resistance http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php)