Grunt
3rd December 2008, 13:50
Sorry for asking, but how important is the 'dialectical' part
of dialectical materialism?
Alright, alright: I know that Dialectical Materialism is
(supposed to be?) the philosophical/metaphysical
background(framework?) of Marxism/Leninism.
And I know what (philosophical) materialism (or positivism)
is.
So Marx was influenced by Hegel (more in his youth, less
later on?) and 'merged'(?) Hegels (idealistic) philosophy with
plain, good, old-fashioned (in a positive sense) materialism?
I read some Hegel - and didn't like it. Schopenhauer called
Hegel and his ardent followers charlatans! :lol:
Now Schopenhauer was everything but a materialist - still
I like some of his stuff. Is that bad?
Don't like the 'mechanical clickety-clack' of dialectics - you
know: Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis-... and so on forever like
a tibetan prayer wheel :lol:)
So my question: Does one have to know and accept Hegel
in order to be a good upstanding
marxist-leninist-bolshevik comrade?
Thanks for your patience!
of dialectical materialism?
Alright, alright: I know that Dialectical Materialism is
(supposed to be?) the philosophical/metaphysical
background(framework?) of Marxism/Leninism.
And I know what (philosophical) materialism (or positivism)
is.
So Marx was influenced by Hegel (more in his youth, less
later on?) and 'merged'(?) Hegels (idealistic) philosophy with
plain, good, old-fashioned (in a positive sense) materialism?
I read some Hegel - and didn't like it. Schopenhauer called
Hegel and his ardent followers charlatans! :lol:
Now Schopenhauer was everything but a materialist - still
I like some of his stuff. Is that bad?
Don't like the 'mechanical clickety-clack' of dialectics - you
know: Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis-... and so on forever like
a tibetan prayer wheel :lol:)
So my question: Does one have to know and accept Hegel
in order to be a good upstanding
marxist-leninist-bolshevik comrade?
Thanks for your patience!