Log in

View Full Version : The Matrix Reloaded: Metaphysics



Anonymous
7th July 2003, 01:45
THE MATRIX

by
Ken Mondschein



Going into The Matrix: Reloaded, I wasn't worried if the fight scenes or special effects would measure up to the first film—it was the metaphysics that bothered me. The first Matrix was such a neat allegory of Gnostic philosophy, I was more concerned with how the Brothers Wachowski could successfully extend the metaphor into three films than whether they could pull off even more virtuoso examples of cinematic ass-stomping. What was mindblowing about the first movie, after all, wasn't the fight choreography or bullet time, but its brave assertion that the banal, day-to-day reality we live in isn't the real world. In that sense, all the wire-fu was just the candy coating on the red pill the filmmakers were offering to every high school student and cubicle slave in the world. (Though, since I study martial arts myself, I found the idea of kung fu as being metaphorical for something happening in hyper-reality, a la Thibault's mysterious circle, to be pretty darn appealing.)

Thankfully, Reloaded more than allayed my fears, even if it seems that half the reviewers either didn't understand what the Wachowskis were getting at, or else were only paying attention during the highway chase. Watching the movie, I was personally less impressed by the fists of digital fury than by the Brothers' evident familiarity with the Dead Sea Scrolls and the theology of Origen of Alexandria. Seen in the light of the books they're referencing, the movie's plot is brilliant; of course, to the non-initiate, the characters' actions and dialogue seems arbitrary and incomprehensible, and the exposition is just filler between car crashes. It would seem, therefore, that a bit of exegesis of The Matrix: Reloaded is warranted. But be warned: If you haven't seen the movie yet, don't read on. There are some major spoilers.

Much like that other great Keanu Reeves vehicle, Bill and Ted's Bogus Journey, The Matrix: Reloaded centers around the hero's journey into the Underworld. Frazier, in The Golden Bough, notes that it is a prophetess—in this case, the Oracle—who sends the hero off on his journey, from where he returns with special knowledge. And, of course, that's just what Neo does, though it would have been a while lot more amusing if he'd had Alex Winter along. (The Oracle probably isn't entirely benign, by the way, even though she may not consciously intend any harm: She is, after all, the one who sent Neo on the path to the Core.)

Neo's first task is to rescue the Keymaker (Randall Duk Kim, doing his best Rick Moranis impression) from the Merovingian, who is a daemon—in both senses of the word—left over from a previous version of the Matrix. (The Merovingians were the ruling Frankish dynasty; they were succeeded by Charlemagne's family, the Carolingians, and then by the Capetians, who thought they were descended from Christ.) The guy in the health food store where I buy my granola and soy milk thinks that The Merovingian was one of Neo's predecessors, but all the explanation I need, as well as the way I understand his obvious fascination with human pleasures, is found in Genesis 6:4—"There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them. . ." According to various sources, including Kabbalah, this mating of men and angels (here, a computer program from an earlier version of the Matrix) is what produced various monsters, such as the vampires and wraiths that serve the Merovingian. Dante, bringing a Christian sensibility to the proceedings, placed these monsters in his Inferno. Thus, though the Merovingian is sort of an antediluvian remnant of the former world, he's also (as is shown by the fact that his wife is named Persephone) kind of like Hades, the holder of the keys to the underworld. What the Keymaker does, much like the golden bough the Sybil gives Aeneas, is open doors and permit Neo access to the underworld—or, in this case, the Core.

After the requisite battles and explosions, Neo gets into the Core and finds The Architect. Considering that The Architect built the Matrix, you might think that he's God. Of course, he's nothing of the sort. In Gnostic theology, it is Satan, not God, who has created the world in order to imprison humanity. It is also the Architect who is unleashing the Sentinels to destroy Zion; that is, beginning the Battle of Armageddon. It is my prediction that in the third and final film, it will be revealed that there is a power behind the Architect, and that he is the one who sent the One into the Matrix. It is also my prediction that this guy will look a lot like Neo.

The important thing is choosing what to believe from the raft of condescending exposition that the Architect inflicts on Neo. He says, basically, that though ninety-nine percent of humans believe in the illusion of the Matrix, there is that troublesome one percent (comparable to the few awakened Gnostic true believers) who refuse to believe in the created world. This tends to produce massive amounts of instability, and crashes the system. (Not coincidentally, most of the people in Zion seem to be black or Hispanic, which, besides adding a natty Rasta feel to the place, makes perfect sense: If you're a white suburban Matrix resident, driving your Matrix SUV to your Matrix golf club, why doubt the nature of reality?) The solution is that they allow the dissidents to escape to Zion, which they can then periodically destroy. They have also created the Prophecy of the One, who is in fact a device sent by the machines into the "real" world so that his knowledge of humanity may be integrated into the system in order to further perfect the Matrix-illusion, and then allowed to re-start Zion so that the cycle can begin again. The idea of multiple creations and a cycle of created and destroyed worlds is, needless to say, also found in theologies as wildly variant as the Mayan and the Buddhist. (And, in the Mayan reckoning, we're currently in the fifth cycle—the sixth starts in 2012.)

The idea that the Prophecy—and Zion—were just another means of control is lifted right out of French philosophy. The first movie made use of Baudrillard's Simulacra and Simulation; this movie seems to be dipping into Foucault and Derrida, who wrote that the systems of power and control are all-pervasive, and language is one of the ways they make their influence felt. The Prophecy is, like all prophecies, speech, and thus language. More importantly, it is a religion, and, as John Zerzan writes, the purpose of a religion is to manipulate signs, that is, words, for the purpose of control. Zion is the longed-for millennial promised land; by keeping the war between good and evil foremost in their hearts, even the freed humans are kept from doubting their own world, from thinking too hard about why things are the way they are. Zion needn't be another computer simulation; it could merely be a society created by the machines for controlling the free-range humans (kinda like grunge music was created in the early nineties to control disaffected teenagers).

Understanding why things are the way they are requires an understanding of another holy text: Asimov's Laws of Robotics. The machines, as demonstrated by Smith's need to try to kill Neo even after being "freed," don't have free will. (Likewise, in various theologies, angels and other such divine beings also don't have free will—only humans do.) The bit about the machines needing human bio-energy to survive, as Morpheus (the dreamer) explained in the first movie, is bullshit. The machines keep humanity alive but imprisoned, even after taking over the world, because they were created to serve people. In other words, the machines would like to destroy humanity, but they CAN'T. Instead, they need a human to make the choice.

As the Architect reveals, Neo is not the first One, but rather the sixth. Why the sixth? The answer is that Neo's five previous incarnations represent the Five Books of Moses that make up the Old Testament. Neo (representing Christ, and thus the New Testament) differs from his five predecessors in his capacity to love. In the work of Origen of Alexandria and other early Christian writers, it is love ("eros" in Greek) that compels Christ to come down from the heavens to redeem humanity. Furthermore, "neo" means "new"—as in "New Covenant." In Neo, the machines have finally found the iteration of the One who will make the illogical choice of saving Trinity and dooming humanity. [Note to the theology geeks who've been e-mailing me: I know the difference between eros and agape, but both terms are apropos for reasons I'd have to delve into pre-Socratic philosophy to explain.]

This is the Architect's real purpose in giving Neo a choice between two doors. At once all human and all machine, rather than being a device to refine the Matrix into a more perfect simulation of reality, re-found Zion, and thus continue the endless cycle of death and rebirth—as the Architect says he is—the purpose of the One is to be manipulated into destroying all of humanity. However, not having free will themselves, the machines are not able to comprehend it in others—and thus Neo, being also human, is a bit of a wild card. It is Neo's destiny—as was Christ's in Origen's theology—to break the cycle of death and rebirth, and offer humanity a new future. This is shown by the fact that, by the end of the movie, Neo (and also, incidentally, Smith) gain power in the "real world"—which shows that he has power not only over the first—level simulated world of the Matrix, but also the second-level simulation of Zion.

Miscellaneous touches I liked:

Neo and Trinity are shown making love beneath an arch. In religious iconography, being shown beneath an arch is a traditional sign of divinity. Masaccio's fresco at the right, for instance, shows the Holy Trinity beneath an arch.
Neo and Trinity's kissy-face is cut in with the public-lewdness-in-a-cave of the decieved Zionites. The real meaning of the overlong rave scene is to contrast sacred and profane love.
The fact that The One comes from the machine world is a brilliant way to write around the fact that Keanu Reeves can't act.
Neo's own gift of prophecy is explainable by the fact that, like the Oracle (the Gnostic Sophia, or Holy Wisdom—the female Godhead), he comes from beyond the Matrix—that is, the world—and thus exists outside of time, much like God in St. Augustine's theology.
I saw the movie sitting next to a really cute girl.


Things to be wrapped up in the third movie:

Who's behind The Architect?
The Architect said Neo "has already" made a choice—but what was this choice?

What's Agent Smith's role in all this? His ability to multiply is reminiscent of the demon Jesus exorcised ("my name is Legion"), but I bet he's going to wind up being an ally of Neo's.
How is Neo able to zap the machines in the "real world"?
What is Zion really?
How did Tank die? And what was Marcus Chong smoking?
Will Link live to see Zee again?
Will Niobe leave Jason Lock and go back to Morpheus? [No, she isn't dead—it was the other ship that got blown up.]
What're they going to do about the fact that Gloria Foster, who played The Oracle, died? [She had shot most of her scenes for Reloaded, but not for Revolutions.]
Will priestly cassocks become a fashion trend for men?
What pivotal role will be performed by Neo's adoring acolyte?
How will Bane sabotage the human defense of Zion? Will Neo kill him?
What led Morpheus to the Oracle in the first place?
Is the "real world" only another level of simulation, an outer matrix, indicative of matrices upon matrices, onionlike in their layering upon each other?
The climactic Battle of Armageddon between Good and Evil will have to take place—but what will happen afterwards?
If the Zion-world is revealed to be also fake in the third movie, will the trilogy end with Neo leading his followers into the sunlit "real" world? [Of course, any world in the movie is false—it is, after all, a movie.]
Will Neo wake up and say, "Bill, dude, you won't believe this *****in' dream I just had. . ."?

http://www.corporatemofo.com/stories/051803matrix.htm

antieverything
7th July 2003, 02:54
Wow...the religious stuff certainly brings new theories into play...previously I had some ideas as to what would happen which I posted somewhere else and will copy and paste to here:

OK, towards the begining I just thought that Zion was founded on the present day continent of Africa (of course, there weren't many "Africans" only "African-Americans" but this is Hollywood). Later it occured to me that they may just have some sort of affermative action or racial preference thing on who they save from the Matrix. Later, however, it occured to me. The last "one" was either black or had a preference for black people. [ok, the ideas in the previous post make much more sense]

Did you guys come up with same conclusion about Neo's powers at the end of the film as I? Well...actually there are two explanations I can think of.

1. This one is kinda lame but I think that it will turn out to be the real answer when Revolutions comes out. Neo's experience in the Matrix has taught him that if he transcends the world and his perceptions, he can exert his will on it/them. He may now have transcended the real world and is able to become the Superman/Jesus guy in the real world as well. If the first Matrix taught us anything it is that reality is subjective.

2. This is the explanation I came up with on the ride home and it makes more sense but wouldn't make as good of a movie. That is, the "real world" is just another computer program that Neo has learned to manipulate. Obviously they can't figure out how to escape this program, figure out how to hack into the Matrix from the real world, and mount a successful offensive against the machines in one movie so this would probably end with the people of Zion reveling and Neo sitting in a corner brooding over the fact that they are still slaves...they just don't know it. Nothing has changed from when they were actually in the Matrix. Certainly, this would make more sense from the Machines' standpoint...a clever strategy. I don't see how this could possibly come up with a satisfactory ending so I hope this isn't the way things are.

3. When Neo "destroyed" Smith, not only did Neo's code imprint on Smith, Smith's code imprinted on Neo. Now, Neo has some control over machines in the real world...I think it's pretty dumb but it'll probably be how things turn out. [it's pretty obvious to me that Smith will turn out to be the unaccounted for variable...the wrench in the gears]

suffianr
8th July 2003, 07:43
What a complete load of bollocks.

Anonymous
11th July 2003, 08:10
2. This is the explanation I came up with on the ride home and it makes more sense but wouldn't make as good of a movie. That is, the "real world" is just another computer program that Neo has learned to manipulate. Obviously they can't figure out how to escape this program, figure out how to hack into the Matrix from the real world, and mount a successful offensive against the machines in one movie so this would probably end with the people of Zion reveling and Neo sitting in a corner brooding over the fact that they are still slaves...they just don't know it. Nothing has changed from when they were actually in the Matrix. Certainly, this would make more sense from the Machines' standpoint...a clever strategy. I don't see how this could possibly come up with a satisfactory ending so I hope this isn't the way things are.


This is probably the best and most likely explanation. How else could he have excorcised such power over the machines in the 'real world'? I mean, being able to deactivate them is one thing, but being able to stop them dead in their tracks during a full on charge? No. That's only something that can be done in the Matrix, or in a similar computer generated reality.

Yep, I'll bet my money on it. I think this is exactly how things will turn out. However, I don't really see the Wachowski bros. ending such an incredible sci-fi trilogy as the Matrix in such an anti-climactic fashion.

antieverything
11th July 2003, 23:17
...we can only hope that we're wrong and Revolutions blows us on our asses!

kalakbay
14th July 2003, 07:45
wow! and i thought i was the only one who saw what u have just elaborated on, it reminds me of what my old friend in the cordillera mountains told me, "what if the supreme being gave us eyes just to blind us from reality?"

synthesis
14th July 2003, 10:28
I don't know if the article pointed this out, antieverything, because I haven't read it yet, but the Architect did mention that there were "multiple levels" to the Matrix, if I remember correctly.

Therefore, it is possible for not only the "Matrix" to be fake, and for the "real world" to be fake, it is possible for the level beyond that to be a farce as well.

Imagine having, like, eight consecutive "awakenings." What the fuck would the last level look like?

truthaddict11
14th July 2003, 16:40
jesus christ people it is a movie! a really bad one at that. while your discussing the details of the Matrix why not Terminator too because we all know the machines are an allegory to microsoft and technology ;). god damn people they are movies FICTIONAL MOVIES we dont need to rip apart every little bit of these movies so we can "philosophize" on what some writer stole from religious writings. Just so you know there is already a wacko out there saying that we are in a "matrix" thats controled by "aliens" we dont listen to religious figures why should we listen to some freak whose theories are based on a movie.

antieverything
15th July 2003, 02:27
Gobble a dick, ass-doucher ;)

Saint-Just
15th July 2003, 15:23
Double Post:

(Edited by Chairman Mao at 3:29 pm on July 15, 2003)

Elect Marx
15th July 2003, 15:25
Truthaddict... you have soured this thread. Interpeting artforms is a great activity that increases your capasity to examine issues. This could be a reflection of your perspective and allows people to relatate. Too be I do not read that much theology. I would like to know though if anyone has seen the Animatrix. To me it seems to be much more abstract. I would like it to have more of a plot line, although it was faiirly enertaining. I liked the different forms of animation, sort of distortions used, that were unlike forms I have seen before.

Saint-Just
15th July 2003, 15:31
Normally I don't make any comment on films and so forth anyway... There are a few questions raised here as to what actually happened in Matrix: Reloaded.

Its unsurprising you do not know since you have to watch the film a number of times to understand, although everything is explained in the film.

Anyway, the second interpretation is partly right.

What Neo and the others consider the 'real world' is still the Matrix. It is a programme wrote by the oracle (the old black woman in the park) that people who reject the Matrix are sent in to. Neo is a programme also, he was wrote by that woman to give those who reject the Matrix hope that they will defeat the machines.

There have been more than one version of the Matrix. There have been 6, the first two were wrote by the man with the grey beard that Neo meets. The last 4 were wrote by the oracle.

This story in my opinion is excellent because it means in revolution they will have to both fight the machines and escape the Matrix into the real world.

By the way, this interpretation is seemingly what is explained in the film and the general given explanation but until we see revolution we will not really know. Maybe it will become Morpheus's strange cult will become known as what is really the truth, unlikely but you get the idea the story could take many twists.

Sabocat
15th July 2003, 15:44
I like your theory CM. However, instead of the Oracle, being the creator of the later "Matrix's", I would suggest that it might be the character Persephone. As a possible hint to that fact, when the Architect is questioned by Neo with regards to the "mother" of the Matrix being the Oracle, the Architect says..."Please!"...

Look up the name Persephone. I think it has some relevance.

Saint-Just
15th July 2003, 18:06
Quote: from Disgustapated on 3:44 pm on July 15, 2003
I like your theory CM. However, instead of the Oracle, being the creator of the later "Matrix's", I would suggest that it might be the character Persephone. As a possible hint to that fact, when the Architect is questioned by Neo with regards to the "mother" of the Matrix being the Oracle, the Architect says..."Please!"...

Look up the name Persephone. I think it has some relevance.

Yes, Persephone means Wife of Hades according to the greek mythology that influences various other aspects of the Matrix, as for example the term Oracle.

That I suppose is because she is the partner of such a detestable programme.

I do not think she is involved in the creation of the Matrix, little time is afforded to her in the film.

Well, in my theory the Architect created the first two Matrices. So maybe that is why he says such a thing when Neo suggests the Oracle is the "mother" of the Matrix.

Anyway, we will only find out when we see Matrix Revolution.

But do you have your own theory...

Anyway, i'll tell you the most interesting thing I have considered.

Consider this... All those that have been taken out of the Matrix feel they are somehow more liberated and free than those still in the Matrix. This is why they would never go back into the Matrix.

In the first film we find that Neo would prefer to see what is outside the Matrix and once he does argues that although life is materially worse outside he is more happy.

But... if you believe my theory that the 'real world' is not the real world but actually a programme set up by the oracle for those who reject the Matrix and that actually they are still in the Matrix, you then have to think of this....

That they are happy because they believe they are outside the Matrix, but, in reality they are still inside it, therefore the Matrix does is capable of fooling people into thinking they are inside reality, and that actually, Neo is just as happy still being inside the Matrix.


One last thing, the statement 'you don't ask what will you do because it has already been determined, but rather why you are doing it Neo'. Well, this is the key to Neo realise he is a programme, he needs to discover that the answer to why he is doing these things is because he is a programme, once he has realised he is a programme he will essentially have malfunctioned and be able to act outside of what these programmes have determined and therefore shape his and everyone else's future according to free will.

(Edited by Chairman Mao at 6:09 pm on July 15, 2003)

antieverything
15th July 2003, 23:23
Yeah, awesome point...I'd put money on Neo turning out to be a program.