Unrelenting Steve
31st May 2003, 10:02
Hi, I thought I put this a post similar to this in the lounge, it must have been deleted (I can guess why since it was a little political) I have now found a place to post this: here, please read and tell me where I have gone wrong or where I am spot on. thanx.
I have been using this little piece of writting to get poeple to join my specific group in my country. please give some sought of critique:
I don’t have all the answers, but the thing is without the constraint of democracy, we select few will have a much greater chance of coming up with something better than what democracy can evolve into.
When people vote they do not vote for the party that is the most morally correct or most fit to rule that will uphold the constitution of that country. They vote based on their own selfish interests. There are a lot of people in my country who are criminals because the system as it stands doesn’t offer them a job or food, but these people are still expected to follow the restrictions of our society, clearly the social contract is not kept up, this is only the fault of how our constitution plays a role in governance in my country, it can only limit new bills and acts of parliament from not contradicting the constitution but it does in no way stimulate bills to uphold what is already written, e.g. substantial food for all. And because there is no political will to institute such measures, these people find themselves in a hopeless plight simply because the starving are all uneducated and the educated are working class or middle class who either believe in the system or benefit from the system too much as it stands to want it to change.
This states why the society I live in and all democracies are immoral and why they can’t change from within their own democratic systems. This is why we must make a system of debate and a hierarchy that serves the truth best. We must be careful no to tread on the graves of our predecessors, Hitler, Marx and the people who are running America who have done a pretty damn good job up till now. We must crush capitalism (I’m sure that doesn’t need elaboration) We must not imitate their mistakes and we must tread a true line that might not stay fixed, but that will be followed till we find what this planet has only thought about producing but never progressed towards through their self serving rut in democracy.
Everything is debatable, the important thing is we organise and act; we need to spread and collect resources. We must succeed before it is to late to do anything before our currently pretty free environments get more policed, which is where we might be headed, let us do our task while it is easy before it becomes hard and because it is just the right thing to do.
Is it too much to ask this world for some moral consistently? Someone must make the corrections or make the moral concessions in which case I hope all external actions that have an affect on you are based on the same amoral and immoral motives as you have inflicted on the people in your own society.
Perhaps instead of a system that takes you into consideration simply by virtue of being the correct age. We could have a system of debate that determines our rule, much like the system within a one party communist state.
I have been using this little piece of writting to get poeple to join my specific group in my country. please give some sought of critique:
I don’t have all the answers, but the thing is without the constraint of democracy, we select few will have a much greater chance of coming up with something better than what democracy can evolve into.
When people vote they do not vote for the party that is the most morally correct or most fit to rule that will uphold the constitution of that country. They vote based on their own selfish interests. There are a lot of people in my country who are criminals because the system as it stands doesn’t offer them a job or food, but these people are still expected to follow the restrictions of our society, clearly the social contract is not kept up, this is only the fault of how our constitution plays a role in governance in my country, it can only limit new bills and acts of parliament from not contradicting the constitution but it does in no way stimulate bills to uphold what is already written, e.g. substantial food for all. And because there is no political will to institute such measures, these people find themselves in a hopeless plight simply because the starving are all uneducated and the educated are working class or middle class who either believe in the system or benefit from the system too much as it stands to want it to change.
This states why the society I live in and all democracies are immoral and why they can’t change from within their own democratic systems. This is why we must make a system of debate and a hierarchy that serves the truth best. We must be careful no to tread on the graves of our predecessors, Hitler, Marx and the people who are running America who have done a pretty damn good job up till now. We must crush capitalism (I’m sure that doesn’t need elaboration) We must not imitate their mistakes and we must tread a true line that might not stay fixed, but that will be followed till we find what this planet has only thought about producing but never progressed towards through their self serving rut in democracy.
Everything is debatable, the important thing is we organise and act; we need to spread and collect resources. We must succeed before it is to late to do anything before our currently pretty free environments get more policed, which is where we might be headed, let us do our task while it is easy before it becomes hard and because it is just the right thing to do.
Is it too much to ask this world for some moral consistently? Someone must make the corrections or make the moral concessions in which case I hope all external actions that have an affect on you are based on the same amoral and immoral motives as you have inflicted on the people in your own society.
Perhaps instead of a system that takes you into consideration simply by virtue of being the correct age. We could have a system of debate that determines our rule, much like the system within a one party communist state.