opposing ideologies links

[Ken]

primitivism

http://www.johnzerzan.net/articles/seize-the-day.html

http://www.primitive.org/nothing.htm



anarchism - good if you havent been here before.

shoplifting

http://www.crimethinc.com/texts/days/shoplifting.php

myth of the mainstream

http://www.crimethinc.com/texts/days/bourgeoisie.php


other

gender equality failures

http://www.corrupt.org/articles/lifestyle/lance_bateman/sexual_competition_means_alienation

anus.com

http://www.anus.com/zine/articles/alexis/daybreak/

[Dust Bunnies]

I predict that there will be a "Cool Story Bro" coming up.

[danyboy27]

cool story bro.

okay, where my money bunny?

[Dimentio]

Anus xd

[Jazzratt]

If you would care to explain why these links are relevent and so on you might get a little further.

Also, I'm with Serpent. lol, anus.

[Dust Bunnies]

Good to have you back Ken.

[Dean]

:-P*

[#FF0000]

ANUS = Fascists, though.

EDIT: So it Corrupt.com, by the way

[Dust Bunnies]

So lets make an intelligent discussion around the links he posted.

[Ken]

Good to have you back Ken.

:) :)

[Ken]

If you would care to explain why these links are relevent and so on you might get a little further.


different opinions and perspective are always good. i thought more people would post links to websites that arent communist, but not yet it seems.



http://www.crimethinc.com/texts/days/shoplifting.php


anti capitalist perspective on shoplifting. good for spetznaz to read(did i spell that right?) and any other commies or learners etc.


ANUS = Fascists, though.

EDIT: So it Corrupt.com, by the way

yeah... they are. it took me a while to realize though, and they advocate fascism in some of their articles but most dont even mention it. they have lots of good articles. its fun and intellectually satisfying to challenge your beliefs from these perspectives, which i dont neccessarily believe in(im not a fascist). its not bonehead *************** type fascism. corrupt.org articles critisize culture, lifestyle, technology.



A common attitude amongst modern women in the West is that the pill is liberation. The reality is that the pill further subjugates women to men by giving them more incentive to make themselves sexually available to emotionally unavailable men. It is alarming how few women realize this. "Well, I know he doesn't care for me emotionally, but at least I won't be getting pregnant!" How is throwaway sex a moral or a good decision? How does this help women as a gender?


i agree with that! also, i read somewhere(but i cant find where now) that sexual assault in the workplace was more about men's hunger for power than discrimonation.

[danyboy27]

i am against shoplifting.
i am not taking the risk to get a criminal reccord for something like a cd or a pair of shoes, my integrity and credibility worth way more than that.

i am probably the only person on the internet that pay for his porn so it show you how straight i am in term of laws.

i may not obey all laws, but when i disobey, its a quick shot.

[ÑóẊîöʼn]

All that primitivism crap is the "good old days" fallacy combined with Mean World Syndrome (where mass media gives the appearance of a world that is worse than it actually is).

Decentralised, insular little communities are breeding grounds for parochialism, racism, provincialism, sexism, and general in-group nepotism and out-group hostility. Just think about the sort of people who are more likely to be tolerant and open-minded; the city-dweller who has to deal with a large variety of strangers on a daily basis, or the ignorant country shitkicker who's on a first-name basis with everyone else in their little village?

As for "doing nothing" - that's fucking boring. True, it may be easier and quicker to cup one's hands in order to drink from a stream, but you can't have a tea or coffee in this manner, something which I'm rather partial to if I'm camping out in the cold and wet.

Websites like CrimethInc, Corrupt and ANUS (lolololol) are so fucking full of themselves it's unbelievable. Here's an example:

Judge orders loud rap fan to embrace classical music (http://www.corrupt.org/news/judge_orders_loud_rap_fan_to_embrace_classical_mus ic)


When you've listened for too long to one-dimensional music consisting of a monotonous beat, a simple 8-note non-narrative melody, and jibberish ego-monologues in pop format, Beethoven and Chopin will strike you as threatening.Or maybe he just doesn't like that kind of music, you pretentious fuckwits?

The pill is liberating is because it allows women to choose when sex results in pregnancy, it's that simple.

[Ken]

i am against shoplifting.
i am not taking the risk to get a criminal reccord for something like a cd or a pair of shoes, my integrity and credibility worth way more than that.

i am probably the only person on the internet that pay for his porn so it show you how straight i am in term of laws.

i may not obey all laws, but when i disobey, its a quick shot.

you pay for porn? i go to redtube.

for the record, i am all for shoplifting and publicly advocate it(with the associated belief) whenever i can. if i thought if it was ethical, i would buy everything. but its not so i steal what i can. i dont steal when i think theres a chance i can get caught though.


All that primitivism crap is the "good old days" fallacy combined with Mean World Syndrome (where mass media gives the appearance of a world that is worse than it actually is).


but they were good! everything we can guess about the old times was better than life today... except that they didnt have videogames :( Mean World Syndrome sounds like communism.

i think a lot more people than we generalize know that the world isnt really that great right now. primitivism is so interesting and attractive because it negates the concept of civilization altogether.



Decentralised, insular little communities are breeding grounds for parochialism, racism, provincialism, sexism, and general in-group nepotism and out-group hostility. Just think about the sort of people who are more likely to be tolerant and open-minded; the city-dweller who has to deal with a large variety of strangers on a daily basis, or the ignorant country shitkicker who's on a first-name basis with everyone else in their little village?

i dont understand this hyperthetical situation.



As for "doing nothing" - that's fucking boring. True, it may be easier and quicker to cup one's hands in order to drink from a stream, but you can't have a tea or coffee in this manner, something which I'm rather partial to if I'm camping out in the cold and wet.

yeah you can! water and milk powder and tea leaves! light a fire and boil water :)

did you even read the article? it said that doing nothing was so fun because nomadic man needing nothing else to do and had ample time to do nothing. e.g. he just fed his ape wife and ape son and the elderly, he sits and has nothing else to do. his ape wife and ape son and elderly are happy so he is content. all is well with the world!



Judge orders loud rap fan to embrace classical music (http://www.corrupt.org/news/judge_orders_loud_rap_fan_to_embrace_classical_mus ic)

Or maybe he just doesn't like that kind of music, you pretentious fuckwits?

that is hilarious would you rather he listen to gangsta rap or Beethoven? which is more intellectually engaging?



The pill is liberating is because it allows women to choose when sex results in pregnancy, it's that simple.

it really isnt that simple. it would be nice if it was though.

women now give men sex for free, never in human history have men been so spoiled for sex than right now. we want lots of sex, we get lots of sex, and then women wonder why we dont want to commit. hmm. the pill upsets the balance.

im weird though, depending on your point of view. i wouldnt have sex with someone i didnt want a baby with.

i think if one woman decides to have an abortion because it isnt the right time for a baby, then she shouldnt be allowed to ever have a baby at all at any time.

[Plagueround]

women now give men sex for free, never in human history have men been so spoiled for sex than right now. we want lots of sex, we get lots of sex, and then women wonder why we dont want to commit. hmm. the pill upsets the balance.


This is such a simplistic and vile view of women...not to mention history. Did you ever stop to consider that the reason women are more liberated sexually might be because they don't have to adhere to this "subservient tool just waiting for a husband" stereotype?*


*well...at least not as much as they used to...

[ÑóẊîöʼn]

but they were good! everything we can guess about the old times was better than life today... except that they didnt have videogames :( Mean World Syndrome sounds like communism.

No, you are wrong. The old days were worse than today. People died of treatable diseases, racism and sexism was not only common but acceptable, torture and mutiliation were considered acceptable punishments for crimes, and people burnt cats for fun (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_burning).

Mean World Syndrome is the result of sensationalist mass media that concentrates on particularly vile crimes, which in our crowded world means that violent crime appears to be on the increase even if it is actually decreasing as a proportion of the population. Combine this with the fact that one can communicate across almost the entire world practically instantaneously, then all the world's gruesomeness is on show, not just that of your neighbourhood.


i think a lot more people than we generalize know that the world isnt really that great right now. primitivism is so interesting and attractive because it negates the concept of civilization altogether.Yes, people are constantly kept in fear by a sensationalist media because it makes the populace amenable to control and interference, and helps to sell newspapers and products.

But if you actually look past surface impressions, then it becomes clear that civilisation was a quantum leap for humanity, and we're getting better at it all the time. Early civilisations had bloody gladiatorial contests, human sacrifice and public executions - modern civilisation has computer games, where where people are free to act out their violent urges without actually hurting anyone. Which do you think is better?


i dont understand this hyperthetical situation.Basically, if we went back to all living in cosy little villages and small bands of huneter-gatherers, we'd lose all the social advances we've so far accumulated - like the idea that people should not be judged because of their birthplace, nationality skin colour, gender, sexual orientation and all that lot.


yeah you can! water and milk powder and tea leaves! light a fire and boil water :)Yes, but I can't put boiling water in my cupped hands without badly scalding myself. One of the articles to which you linked ("The Art of Nothing") suggested that it was better to cup one's hands than to take the time to fashion oneself a cup.

Modern technology actually makes the business of camping out easier, not more difficult as that article suggests. Waterproof matches (or even just a Zippo lighter) are far easier to use than faffing about with flint and tinder, and it's much easier to light a portable stove than to gather the materials for a traditional campfire.

And why bother with tea leaves when teabags have already been invented? just as easy, and you don't have to pick bits of tea leaf out of your teeth.


did you even read the article? it said that doing nothing was so fun because nomadic man needing nothing else to do and had ample time to do nothing. e.g. he just fed his ape wife and ape son and the elderly, he sits and has nothing else to do. his ape wife and ape son and elderly are happy so he is content. all is well with the world!Yeah, it's easy to not be bored when you have no idea what you're missing. I'm sure that sitting about staring at the clouds would be my idea of a good time if I had grown up without the mind-boggling variety of books, movies, games, internet sites, and other cultural paraphernalia of modern civilisation.

Eating, sleeping, reproducing and otherwise doing nothing is what the other animals do, but humans are different. Humans have the intelligence to become bored, to wonder if there is more to life than this.


that is hilarious would you rather he listen to gangsta rap or Beethoven? which is more intellectually engaging?I would rather listen to Pystrance (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psytrance), myself.

And what makes you think all people listen to music for "intellectual engagement"? Whatever happened to listening to music because it sounds good?


it really isnt that simple. it would be nice if it was though.

women now give men sex for free, never in human history have men been so spoiled for sex than right now. we want lots of sex, we get lots of sex, and then women wonder why we dont want to commit. hmm. the pill upsets the balance.What balance? And I find your insinuation that men are only willing to commit to a woman if sex isn't easily available to be quite frankly insulting - it suggests that the only reason a man would commit to a woman is so that he can get sex. Hasn't it ever crossed your mind that intimate relationships might involve more than just sex?


im weird though, depending on your point of view. i wouldnt have sex with someone i didnt want a baby with.Why? What's wrong with having sex for mutual pleasure?


i think if one woman decides to have an abortion because it isnt the right time for a baby, then she shouldnt be allowed to ever have a baby at all at any time.Which is why things like the pill are liberating, because it means she can have sex without having to worry about a pregnancy ruining her schedule.

[freakazoid]

women now give men sex for free, never in human history have men been so spoiled for sex than right now. we want lots of sex, we get lots of sex, and then women wonder why we dont want to commit.

Man, where have I been when all this free sex was being given out. :(

[Rascolnikova]

I love how this discussion has such an emphasis on sex for "free. . ." It's really a fantastic point. I know I want a man to pay me when I whore, and I'm certain that a return to family values is the best way to institute that.


In seriousness--let's examine this situation a little more intelligently. Could it be that there are strong cultural trends leading men--and women--to take the view that part of the reason women exist is to be used for sex? That this is entirely to be expected, and that to expect otherwise is unrealistic and unreasonable?

And if that's the case, where exactly would that view have come from? By any chance, could some notion of "family" that originated in the ownership of one human being by another have to do with it?

[freakazoid]

you pay for porn? i go to redtube.

I prefer pornhub myself. :lol:

[Ken]

I love how this discussion has such an emphasis on sex for "free. . ." It's really a fantastic point. I know I want a man to pay me when I whore, and I'm certain that a return to family values is the best way to institute that.


In seriousness--let's examine this situation a little more intelligently. Could it be that there are strong cultural trends leading men--and women--to take the view that part of the reason women exist is to be used for sex? That this is entirely to be expected, and that to expect otherwise is unrealistic and unreasonable?

And if that's the case, where exactly would that view have come from? By any chance, could some notion of "family" that originated in the ownership of one human being by another have to do with it?

i sort of take that view. women are fairly useful in that they make the babies. and definitely they are very useful for sex. and with porn and advertising and other media stuff, women are objectified even more to make us believe they are only useful for sex. womens apparant complacency in allowing themselves to be objectified doesnt help. neither does their being innately dumb and emotionally centered. they dont understand how our brains are wired and how they look like sex/legs to us. even though they are stupider they are much more sensitive than men which is why i like having a few close female friends :D

and hey... men are the real power holders. we do all the neccessary labor. we build bridges, towers, skyscrapers, fix leaky pipes, make cupboards, kill beasts, compete with each other in the workplace. we are humanity's driving force. women just make the babies :D

shields arms over face to protect self from knees of hordes of incoming pc communists !

[Ken]

But if you actually look past surface impressions, then it becomes clear that civilisation was a quantum leap for humanity, and we're getting better at it all the time. Early civilisations had bloody gladiatorial contests, human sacrifice and public executions - modern civilisation has computer games, where where people are free to act out their violent urges without actually hurting anyone. Which do you think is better?


bloody gladitorial contests sound heaps better imo. not with cats or any animals, but with people. i dont use computer games to act out my violent urges... not at all. they are fun and challenging. anyway what are you saying? that our bread and circus has become more sophisticated or more pacifist?



Basically, if we went back to all living in cosy little villages and small bands of huneter-gatherers, we'd lose all the social advances we've so far accumulated - like the idea that people should not be judged because of their birthplace, nationality skin colour, gender, sexual orientation and all that lot.


i was going to write that i disagree with you on fundamental principles and thats all i can say but this is just plain stupid. those ideas that people should be judged came from civilization/hierachical civilization, not pre-agrarian society. because its much less complicated than civilization. you can judge someone based upon their productivity or niceness.




Yes, but I can't put boiling water in my cupped hands without badly scalding myself. One of the articles to which you linked ("The Art of Nothing") suggested that it was better to cup one's hands than to take the time to fashion oneself a cup.

Modern technology actually makes the business of camping out easier, not more difficult as that article suggests. Waterproof matches (or even just a Zippo lighter) are far easier to use than faffing about with flint and tinder, and it's much easier to light a portable stove than to gather the materials for a traditional campfire.

And why bother with tea leaves when teabags have already been invented? just as easy, and you don't have to pick bits of tea leaf out of your teeth.

Yeah, it's easy to not be bored when you have no idea what you're missing. I'm sure that sitting about staring at the clouds would be my idea of a good time if I had grown up without the mind-boggling variety of books, movies, games, internet sites, and other cultural paraphernalia of modern civilisation.


my point is that technology makes it too easy(or too complicated, and alienating, and has other effects but ill stick with this one). the point is to do it yourself and its fun like that.



Eating, sleeping, reproducing and otherwise doing nothing is what the other animals do, but humans are different. Humans have the intelligence to become bored, to wonder if there is more to life than this.



actually it was my dream a few months ago to do nothing but that. i used to go to a pet shop after school every day and saw dogs in the window. they did nothing but eat, sleep and have sex. i thought fuck, that is awesome. i want to be just like that.

i moved out and my life is like that now(except for sex, lol, but i dont want sex right now). but then again i am a welfare leech and everybody has different ideas on what to do in life......

[Rascolnikova]

i sort of take that view. women are fairly useful in that they make the babies. and definitely they are very useful for sex. and with porn and advertising and other media stuff, women are objectified even more to make us believe they are only useful for sex. womens apparant complacency in allowing themselves to be objectified doesnt help. neither does their being innately dumb and emotionally centered. they dont understand how our brains are wired and how they look like sex/legs to us. even though they are stupider they are much more sensitive than men which is why i like having a few close female friends :D

and hey... men are the real power holders. we do all the neccessary labor. we build bridges, towers, skyscrapers, fix leaky pipes, make cupboards, kill beasts, compete with each other in the workplace. we are humanity's driving force. women just make the babies :D

shields arms over face to protect self from knees of hordes of incoming pc communists !

If this is your perception, why do you feel you are in a position to submit arguments about what does and doesn't constitute women's liberation or equality?

Also, I'm most curious; would you share your reasons for


i think if one woman decides to have an abortion because it isnt the right time for a baby, then she shouldnt be allowed to ever have a baby at all at any time.
?

[Ken]

If this is your perception, why do you feel you are in a position to submit arguments about what does and doesn't constitute women's liberation or equality?

Also, I'm most curious; would you share your reasons for

?


why wouldnt i be? i dont hate women.

well, it seems useless and cruel to me to abort a baby because it doesnt fit in with your schedual. kind of like eating meat. its uselessly cruel, and its unhealthy too. so if they do it once i say dont let them have any kids, and those cruel people will die and not come back. -yay!

not that my opinion will ever matter. but its here and i of course like to organize my thoughts, just in case i ever become supreme overlord dictator. :D of course that wont happen.

but hey, opinions are like assholes. everyone has....

[Rascolnikova]

why wouldnt i be? i dont hate women.

well, it seems useless and cruel to me to abort a baby because it doesnt fit in with your schedual. kind of like eating meat. its uselessly cruel, and its unhealthy too. so if they do it once i say dont let them have any kids, and those cruel people will die and not come back. -yay!

not that my opinion will ever matter. but its here and i of course like to organize my thoughts, just in case i ever become supreme overlord dictator. :D of course that wont happen.

but hey, opinions are like assholes. everyone has....

. . .

so now you're implying that cruelty is genetic. . . interesting.

Let's take an analogy. I don't hate dogs. In fact, I love dogs. I don't consider them to be equals, though, so I'm in a poor position to advocate for the idea that dogs should be given rights equal to my own.

Your position on abortion seems to reveal a gross ignorance of the effects of a child who "just didn't fit with her schedule" on a woman's life, but considering that you think women are stupid and should spend their time sexually servicing you and having babies anyway, it could just be that you don't see an unplanned pregnancy as a significant interruption to a woman's schedule. In either case, I am pleased your opinion will never really matter. :)

[ÑóẊîöʼn]

bloody gladitorial contests sound heaps better imo. not with cats or any animals, but with people. i dont use computer games to act out my violent urges... not at all. they are fun and challenging. anyway what are you saying? that our bread and circus has become more sophisticated or more pacifist?

It seems to me to be both. It's not so fun to play lethal games of "capture the flag" when you can't respawn. And how can you say that gladiatorial contests are "better" than computer games?


i was going to write that i disagree with you on fundamental principles and thats all i can say but this is just plain stupid. those ideas that people should be judged came from civilization/hierachical civilization, not pre-agrarian society.

Prove it.


my point is that technology makes it too easy(or too complicated, and alienating, and has other effects but ill stick with this one). the point is to do it yourself and its fun like that.

What's wrong with things being easy?


actually it was my dream a few months ago to do nothing but that. i used to go to a pet shop after school every day and saw dogs in the window. they did nothing but eat, sleep and have sex. i thought fuck, that is awesome. i want to be just like that.

That's disappointing. Not to mention selfish and a waste of potential.


i moved out and my life is like that now(except for sex, lol, but i dont want sex right now). but then again i am a welfare leech and everybody has different ideas on what to do in life......

Believe me, you'll get sick and tired of it... if you have anything more than sub-standard intelligence.

[Ken]

. . .

so now you're implying that cruelty is genetic. . . interesting.

Let's take an analogy. I don't hate dogs. In fact, I love dogs. I don't consider them to be equals, though, so I'm in a poor position to advocate for the idea that dogs should be given rights equal to my own.

Your position on abortion seems to reveal a gross ignorance of the effects of a child who "just didn't fit with her schedule" on a woman's life, but considering that you think women are stupid and should spend their time sexually servicing you and having babies anyway, it could just be that you don't see an unplanned pregnancy as a significant interruption to a woman's schedule. In either case, I am pleased your opinion will never really matter. :)

no... i dont think i mentioned that i wouldnt have sex with someone i didnt want a baby with. so there would be no need for an abortion in any situation. women have more to do than make babies but you can believe i dont believe that if you want to.

of course cruelty is genetic. stupidity is, too. dumb begets dumber. black people have black children. so the less of those people, the better i think :) but i really dont care what anybody does anyway. even though "a woman's right to choose" has never been an objective decision but an enviromental one influenced by our times... media, cosmopolitan magazines, advertising, gender preconceptions, the slow unravelling of judeo-christian dogma... and the technology of abortion itself... destroy that ability and there is nothing to argue over anymore. ohnoes i might have children when i have sex! dirty slobs should be grateful their life expectancy is so high.

[Rascolnikova]

no... i dont think i mentioned that i wouldnt have sex with someone i didnt want a baby with. so there would be no need for an abortion in any situation.

And whether or not she wants to have a baby, or whether or not it's safe for her to have a baby, or whether you can raise a baby outside of abject poverty, has no influence--there would be no need for an abortion in any situation.



women have more to do than make babies but you can believe i dont believe that if you want to.ah-my mistake. I just thought you said


we are humanity's driving force. women just make the babies :D

of course cruelty is genetic. stupidity is, too. dumb begets dumber. black people have black children. so the less of those people, the better i think :) but i really dont care what anybody does anyway. even though "a woman's right to choose" has never been an objective decision but an enviromental one influenced by our times... media, cosmopolitan magazines, advertising, gender preconceptions, the slow unravelling of judeo-christian dogma... and the technology of abortion itself... destroy that ability and there is nothing to argue over anymore. ohnoes i might have children when i have sex! dirty slobs should be grateful their life expectancy is so high.I must humbly suggest that you read a sociology textbook.

And a genetics textbook, for that matter. .

[Plagueround]

i sort of take that view. women are fairly useful in that they make the babies. and definitely they are very useful for sex. and with porn and advertising and other media stuff, women are objectified even more to make us believe they are only useful for sex. womens apparant complacency in allowing themselves to be objectified doesnt help. neither does their being innately dumb and emotionally centered. they dont understand how our brains are wired and how they look like sex/legs to us. even though they are stupider they are much more sensitive than men which is why i like having a few close female friends :D

and hey... men are the real power holders. we do all the neccessary labor. we build bridges, towers, skyscrapers, fix leaky pipes, make cupboards, kill beasts, compete with each other in the workplace. we are humanity's driving force. women just make the babies :D

shields arms over face to protect self from knees of hordes of incoming pc communists !

I don't usually just like to say "You're a fucking idiot" in reply to a post. But holy shit dude...you're a fucking idiot.

[Bilan]

Ken, when will you drop off the face of the earth?

[Module]

i sort of take that view. women are fairly useful in that they make the babies. and definitely they are very useful for sex. and with porn and advertising and other media stuff, women are objectified even more to make us believe they are only useful for sex. womens apparant complacency in allowing themselves to be objectified doesnt help. neither does their being innately dumb and emotionally centered. they dont understand how our brains are wired and how they look like sex/legs to us. even though they are stupider they are much more sensitive than men which is why i like having a few close female friends :D

and hey... men are the real power holders. we do all the neccessary labor. we build bridges, towers, skyscrapers, fix leaky pipes, make cupboards, kill beasts, compete with each other in the workplace. we are humanity's driving force. women just make the babies :D

shields arms over face to protect self from knees of hordes of incoming pc communists !
Coming from somebody who knows you personally, I know for a fact that you are actually one of the most unintelligent people on the face of the earth.
Even when my sister was going out with you she would regularly ***** about how incredibly stupid you were, like how you thought a poodle was a type of cat, and how you spelled words like 'embarrassed' with three 'e's.

And if you want to talk about being 'emotionally centered', I remember one time I and somebody else were with you two when we went to see a movie, and you got depressed afterwards and refused to speak to my sister because you thought that she was ignoring you.
In fact, you being so incredibly emotional all the time was one of the many things that my sister found excruciating about you.

And the whole 'innately dumb' thing; you would know my sister, for one, is pretty much a genius; you're just lying to yourself.

I guess thinking half the population of the world is "innately dumb" probably makes you feel like you have at least something to be proud of, right? :rolleyes:

Fucking loser.

[Bud Struggle]

^^^Pretty damning stuff. Ken, you've been slapped good. :lol:

[Sentinel]

^^^Pretty damning stuff. Ken, you've been slapped good.His third post in this thread should be stored in some kind of famous last words -archive.

There's a limit on how outrageous male chauvinism we ever will tolerate on Revleft -- Oi included. I'm pretty sure Ken has crossed the line now.

[Jazzratt]

Coming from somebody who knows you personally, I know for a fact that you are actually one of the most unintelligent people on the face of the earth.
Even when my sister was going out with you she would regularly ***** about how incredibly stupid you were, like how you thought a poodle was a type of cat, and how you spelled words like 'embarrassed' with three 'e's.

And if you want to talk about being 'emotionally centered', I remember one time I and somebody else were with you two when we went to see a movie, and you got depressed afterwards and refused to speak to my sister because you thought that she was ignoring you.
In fact, you being so incredibly emotional all the time was one of the many things that my sister found excruciating about you.

And the whole 'innately dumb' thing; you would know my sister, for one, is pretty much a genius; you're just lying yourself.

I guess thinking half the population of the world is "innately dumb" probably makes you feel like you have at least something to be proud of, right? :rolleyes:

Fucking loser.

God damn it, I can't give you any rep for that. I think it's the most damning ownage I've seen on the internet.

Just thought I'd add a little:


I guess thinking half the population of the world is "innately dumb" probably makes you feel like you have at least something to be proud of, right? http://www.revleft.com/vb/opposing-ideologies-links-t93032/revleft/smilies/001_rolleyes.gif

Well, if his assumptions are correct (and men are innately intelligent) he's overcome his innate traits in order to become the drooling moron he is now.

[Os Cangaceiros]

Coming from somebody who knows you personally, I know for a fact that you are actually one of the most unintelligent people on the face of the earth.
Even when my sister was going out with you she would regularly ***** about how incredibly stupid you were, like how you thought a poodle was a type of cat, and how you spelled words like 'embarrassed' with three 'e's.

And if you want to talk about being 'emotionally centered', I remember one time I and somebody else were with you two when we went to see a movie, and you got depressed afterwards and refused to speak to my sister because you thought that she was ignoring you.
In fact, you being so incredibly emotional all the time was one of the many things that my sister found excruciating about you.

And the whole 'innately dumb' thing; you would know my sister, for one, is pretty much a genius; you're just lying to yourself.

I guess thinking half the population of the world is "innately dumb" probably makes you feel like you have at least something to be proud of, right? :rolleyes:

Fucking loser.

You actually know this asshole in real life?

My condolences.

[Pirate Utopian]

Coming from somebody who knows you personally, I know for a fact that you are actually one of the most unintelligent people on the face of the earth.
Even when my sister was going out with you she would regularly ***** about how incredibly stupid you were, like how you thought a poodle was a type of cat, and how you spelled words like 'embarrassed' with three 'e's.
:lol::lol::lol:
PWND

[ÑóẊîöʼn]

Coming from somebody who knows you personally, I know for a fact that you are actually one of the most unintelligent people on the face of the earth.

You know him? Next time you see him, you should smack him one!


Fucking loser.

I concur.

[Sentinel]

And we have yet another candidate for 'funniest thread of the year' in the Chit Chat Awards (http://www.revleft.com/vb/2008-chit-chat-t90645/index.html). I hope you all remember to participate?

[#FF0000]

I don't think he had time to read that post before getting banned. :(

[Bud Struggle]

Desrumeaux is being seen by the OI Soviet (the vote--da, da, da, da, da, da, da, da...) as being something of a feisty minx.

;):lol:

Sometimes the quality of the post trancends politics.

[Trystan]

^^^Pretty damning stuff. Ken, you've been slapped good. :lol:

Wehay, drama! :lol:

[freakazoid]

I don't think he had time to read that post before getting banned. http://www.revleft.com/vb/../revleft/smilies/sad.gif

So is he banned or restricted? Under his name it says banned but under that it say restricted. :confused:

[Plagueround]

^
He's been banned.