Log in

View Full Version : Che Guevara's Dubious Legacy - an excellent essay



Liberty Lover
27th April 2003, 03:43
Che Guevara's Dubious Legacy
By John Suarez

"Hatred is an element of struggle; relentless hatred of the enemy that impels us over and beyond the natural limitations of man and transforms us into effective, violent, selective, and cold killing machines. Our soldiers must be thus; a people without hatred cannot vanquish a brutal enemy." Guevara

In the United States the generation of the 1960's spoke often about love and peace, yet this generation carried the image of a man who advocated the use of hatred as a means to an end into their marches and into their dormitories. The image of Che Guevara hanging in the College dorms of young student radicals in the 90's may be cliche, but his message is not. In his Message to the Tricontinental Guevara argued that hatred was something to be harnessed and used for as he put it, "an element of struggle." Not only as an element to struggle against injustice, but to be used to perpetrate new injustices. Guevara describes the utilization of hatred or as he put it "relentless hatred" to "impel us over and beyond the natural limitations of man." This use of hatred to encourage the dehumanization of ones enemy is but another manifestation of the doctrine found throughout the centuries to justify mass murder and torture.

If hate was the solution to all our problems than the victors of this century would have been men like: Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot. Instead they are viewed in most quarters as mass murderers and criminals except for those who are blinded by their "relentless hatred" of their fellow man. History has demonstrated two fundamental approaches to change the face of the world. One way views hatred as an element of the struggle and has been the way for such leaders as: Lenin, Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, and Fidel Castro.

The second way is an alternative to harnessing hatred, and tragically it is the road less traveled. It is the path blazed with the words of Jesus Christ who said, "Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you." This path has and continues to be followed by men of such diverse backgrounds as Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., Lech Walesa, and Vaclav Havel. These men have demonstrated that hatred is something to be overcome, not an "element of struggle," but rather a stumbling block to freedom.

Ours is a battle both of the soul and the material realm. Our enemy is hatred. We have good reason to hate Fidel Castro and his co-conspirators. They have imprisoned tens of thousands of prisoners of conscience, attempted to brainwash a generation, enslaved the Cuban people in a retro-feudal state Castroism created, they have divided families, made political ideology a litmus test for patriotism, created an exile that comprises nearly 20% of the Cuban population,and murdered thousands.

To defeat despotism, we must conquer and destroy our own hatred. We must reject Che Guevara's argument that hatred is good because it, "transforms us into effective, violent, selective, and cold killing machines." We must act not out of hatred for Castro,but out of love for the Cuban people. This should be what drives our purpose and our strategies to bring liberty and justice to the Cuban nation. We will not compromise with evil. We will overcome it. We will exercise our fundamental rights as Cubans and as human beings to be free and moral beings. If they wish to butcher us or imprison us, then it is they who are at fault. If we are to die for the cause of freedom while exercising our God given rights, then we have done nothing wrong.

On July 13, 1994 Castro's agents attacked a tug-boat full of women and children trying to head for sanctuary in a foreign land. They were met by tugs who used high pressure hoses to knock these refugees overboard into the sea, and later these agents rammed the boat drowning 41 passengers. 21 of which were women and children.

One year later on July 13, 1995 Cuban exiles traveled in a flotilla into Cuban waters to honor those who had been massacred a year earlier seeking freedom. We were met by military gunboats, military helicopters, and military jets. We came bearing white roses and a priest to pray over the watery grave of the victims. As we exercised our fundamental right to enter and exit our national territory, the lead ship, Democracia, was rammed, and exiles seriously injured. The exile's response to the military personnel was "brothers, please don't do this."

On October 10, 1995 the Cuban Council "Concilio Cubano" was born, a coalition of civic, political, labor, and human rights organizations joined together in the rebirth of Cuba's civil and moral society. 130 opposition groups joined together on the following mutual points of agreement: respect for human rights, amnesty for all political prisoners, and the re-establishment of the rule of for all Cubans inside and outside of Cuba. The Cuban Council requested permission to hold a national convention on Feb. 24, 1996. Castro could not allow such a coalition to exist because it is a mortal threat to him. This Council looks to the future of the Cuban nation, and charts a course away from the culture of hatred, death, and disaster Castro has brought to the island.

On February 24, 1996 when Concilio Cubano was to meet; Cuba's secret police continued the sweep started weeks earlier to crush the coalition, and Cuban MiGs killed four men who at the time were engaged in a search and rescue mission for Cuban rafters in the Florida Straits. One of these men, Armando Alejandre Jr. was a member of the Committee in support of the Cuban Council in Miami. He was also a 1988 graduate of Florida International University.

How has the exile responded to these outrages: with prayer, sadness for those who have lost loved ones, a renewed call to non-violent confrontation, and finally with another flotilla to honor those who perished at the hands of a tyranny driven by hate.

Che's legacy in Cuba is one neighbor spying on another, high suicide rates, and a generation of young Cubans risking their lives on rafts in the Florida Straits rather than continue to live under a despotic government. A people cannot prosper in a regime founded and based in hatred. We must transcend hate, and we must overcome evil for Cuba to be free.

http://www.fiu.edu/~fcf/che.html



(Edited by Liberty Lover at 3:45 am on April 27, 2003)

hazard
27th April 2003, 04:03
his essay reads like a high school book report

the quotation is taken so far out of context that I do not even know where to begin. che used war as a means to induce revolution. obviously, one cannot help but to hate many things if one is forced to fight a war such as his. hatred of being exploited, hatred of being forced into mandatory slavery, hatred of the ruling class, hating the social conditions. and so on.

to attmempt to paint che as a person propagating the same sort of hate that he himself hated is absolutely idiotic. che hated, in other words, the haters. to me, and to every other communist INCLUDING those involved in the peace movement of the 60's, this is the only hate allowed. personally, I hate to have to hate. so the answer is to destroy the source of my hatred. the haters.

this essay committs two bad fallacies right off the bat. equivocation of the word "hate" which shifts from a general, non specific phrasing to explicitly defined, genocidal hate. this shift in meaning is performed to make che look like he is an evil, hate monger. in reality, the type of hate that applies to che is not even mentioned. such hate is the justifiable hate that arises from constant, century old mistreatment by an exploitive ruling class that has its foundations in greed, racism and pure, evil hatred.

the second major fallacy is a causal slippery slope. the essay begins with the mis-quote of che. and from there it concludes that che was a hypocrite in his own circle. and then, as a hypocrite, he is like a series of other genocidal maniacs. and because he is like these genocidal maniacs, the country he liberated behaves like genocial maniacs. conclusion - cuba is as evil as its founders. based on a series of unrelated and badly reasoned arguments that are sequenced in a horrible and ill connected chain.

bad, high schol level arguing. or, propaganda. take your pick.

the pen
29th April 2003, 21:03
"a revolutionary is motivated by love, if i was to act out of hatred i would be a mercenary"
- che