Log in

View Full Version : How to build a communist party



Jay Rothermel
10th October 2008, 05:50
How to build a communist party: lessons
from 1922 that are still vital today
______________________
Leon Trotsky
The First Five Years of the Communist International
Volume 2
A Militant Labour Programme
for the French Communist Party
December 5, 1922

1) The party’s most pressing task is to organize the resistance of the proletariat against the capitalist offensive which is under way in France as in every other major industrial country. The defence of the 8-hour working day, the maintenance and increase of prevailing wage scales, the struggle for all the immediate economic demands – all this is the best possible platform for reuniting the disorganized proletariat and restoring its confidence in its own strength and future. The party must immediately take the initiative in every united mass action that is capable of halting the offensive of capitalism and instilling the working class with the spirit of unity.

2) The party must undertake a campaign to show the workers the interdependence of maintaining the 8-hour working day and of wages, as well as the inevitable effect of one of these demands upon the other. In its agitation the party must make use not only of the forays of the employers, but also of every attack by the state against the immediate interests of the workers, as for instance the tax on wages, and every economic issue which especially concerns the working class such as the increase in rents, sales taxes, social security, and so on. The party must carry on an active agitation campaign among the workers for the creation of factory and shop committees, embracing all the workers in each enterprise, irrespective of whether they are already organized politically and into unions or not. The aim of these factory and shop committees is to introduce workers’ control over the conditions of work and production.

3) The fighting slogans for the vital material demands of the proletariat must serve as a means of realizing in life the united front against economic and political reaction. The tactic of the workers’ united front must be our governing rule for every mass action. The party must create the favourable conditions for the success of this tactic; and to this end it must undertake seriously the education of its own members and sympathizers by every means of propaganda and agitation at its disposal. The press, the pamphlets, meetings of all sorts, everything must be used in this work of education which the party must carry on in every proletarian group where there are Communists. The party must issue appeals to the important rival political and economic organizations of labour. Therewith it must from time to time publicly explain both its own proposals and those of the reformists, and give reasons for its acceptance of some proposals and the rejection of others. In no case can the party renounce its unconditional independence, its right to criticize all the participants in a joint action. It must always seek to take and keep the initiative of these movements as well as to influence the initiative of the others in the spirit of its own program.

4) To be able to participate in the action of the workers in all its forms, to help in orienting this action or, in certain circumstances, to assume the leading role in the action, the party must, without losing a single day, proceed to organize its work in the trade unions. The formation of trade-union committees in the federations and the sections (decided upon at the Paris Convention) and of Communist cells in every factory and large private or state-owned enterprise will permit the party to penetrate the masses of workers and enable it to spread its slogans and increase Communist influence in the proletarian movement. The trade-union committee, in each party or union body, will maintain connections with the Communists who have, with the permission of the party, remained inside the reformist CGT and will guide their opposition to the policy of the official leaders. They will register every trade-union member of the party, control his activities and transmit to him the instructions of the party.

5) The activities of Communists in all trade unions without exception shall consist primarily in seeking to re-establish trade-union unity, indispensable for the victory of the proletariat. The Communists must take advantage of every opportunity in order to explain the harmful effects of the existing split and to advocate unity. The party must combat every tendency inclining toward organizational exclusiveness, circle-group atmosphere – in trade unions or localities – and anarchistic ideology. It shall defend the necessity of a centralized movement, of forming broad organizations on an industrial basis, and of co-ordinating isolated strikes in order to substitute unified mass actions, which will instil the workers with confidence in their own strength, for localized and partial actions that are doomed to failure. In the CGTU the Communists must combat every tendency opposed to the adhesion of the French trade unions to Red Trade-Union International (RILU). In the reformist CGT they must expose the Amsterdam International and the manipulations of its leaders in favour of class collaboration. In both federations they must fight for joint actions, demonstrations and strikes, for the united front, for organic unity and for the program of the Red Trade-Union International (RILU) as a whole.

6) The party must utilize every large-scale mass movement – spontaneous and organized alike – to show the political character of every class conflict. It must take advantage of every opportunity to spread as widely as possible its slogans of political struggle such as political amnesty, the annulment of the Versailles Treaty, the evacuation of the left bank of the Rhine, and so on.

7) The struggle against the Versailles Treaty and its consequences must remain in the forefront of the party’s entire activity. We must effect the union of the proletariat of France and Germany against the bourgeoisies of both countries who profit by this treaty. In view of this it is the pressing task of the French party to inform the workers and the soldiers of the tragic plight of their German brothers, crushed by the intolerable living conditions resulting primarily from this peace treaty. To satisfy the demands of the Allies the German government keeps increasing the burdens of the German working class. The French bourgeoisie spares the German bourgeoisie, engages in negotiations with it to the detriment of the workers, helps it to take possession of the state-owned public utilities and guarantees it aid and protection against the revolutionary movement. The bourgeoisies of both countries are ready to accomplish the merger of French iron and German coal interests; and they are coming to an understanding on the question of the occupation of the Ruhr, which signifies the enslavement of the Ruhr coal miners. But the exploited workers of the Ruhr basin are not the only ones menaced; the French workers will not be in a position to withstand the competition of German production because the latter will be reduced by the depreciation of the mark to a very cheap price for the French capitalists. The party must explain this situation to the French working class and warn it against the danger which menaces it. The party press must constantly describe the sufferings of the German proletariat, the real victim of the Versailles Treaty, and show the impossibility of carrying out the treaty. Special propaganda must be carried on in the occupied and war-wrecked regions to expose the bourgeoisies of both countries as responsible for the sufferings of these regions, and to develop the spirit of solidarity among the workers of the two countries. The Communist slogan must call for the fraternization of the French and German workers and soldiers on the left bank of the Rhine. The party shall maintain close ties with its sister party in Germany in order successfully to conduct this struggle against the Versailles Treaty and its consequences. The party shall combat French imperialism, and, furthermore, not only its policy in Germany but all over the world: special attention must be paid to the peace treaties of St. Germain, Neuilly, Trianon and Sèvres.

8) The party must undertake systematic penetration of the army. Our anti-militarist propaganda must differ radically from the hypocritical pacifism of the bourgeoisie. The principle of arming the proletariat and disarming the bourgeoisie must permeate our propaganda. In their party press or in the parliament, and on all favourable occasions the Communists shall give support to the demands of the soldiers, insist upon the recognition of their political rights, and so on. Our revolutionary anti-militarist agitation must be intensified each time a new levy is called up for draft, each time there is a threat of another war. This propaganda must be carried on under the supervision of a special party body, in which the Communist youth must participate.

9) The party must make its own the cause of the colonial peoples, exploited and oppressed by French imperialism. It must support their national demands which constitute stages on the road of their liberation from the yoke of foreign capital. It must defend without any reservations their right to autonomy and independence. The unconditional fight for the political and trade-union liberties of the natives, and against the native levies, the fight for the demands of the native soldiers – this fight is the immediate task of the party. It must combat implacably every reactionary tendency, existing even among certain working-class elements, that favours limiting the rights of the natives. It shall create a special body attached to the Central Committee, to carry on party work in the colonies.

10) Our propaganda among the peasantry to win over the agricultural labourers, tenant farmers and poor peasants to the revolutionary movement and gain the sympathies of the small landholders must be accompanied by the struggle to ameliorate the living and working conditions of agricultural labourers who hire out or work for the big landowners. Such a struggle demands that the party organizations in the provinces elaborate and propagate programs of immediate demands corresponding to the special conditions in each locality. The party must foster those agricultural associations and co-operatives which go to meet the individual needs of the peasantry. It must pay special attention to building and developing trade unions among the agricultural workers.

11) Party work among women is of first-rate importance and requires a special organization. A Central Commission, attached to the Central Committee, with a permanent secretariat, and with more and more numerous local commissions and a periodical devoted to propaganda among the women must be created. The party must insist that the economic demands of the men and women workers be unified: it must demand equal pay for equal work without distinction of sex, and the participation of exploited women in all the actions of the workers.

12) The party must make far more systematic and persistent efforts than in the past in the development of the Communist Youth movement. In every department and institution of both organizations the closest reciprocal relations must be established between the party and the youth. It ought to be accepted as a principle that the youth must be represented on every Commission attached to the Central Committee. The propaganda departments and the sections of the party must help the existing youth groups, and help to create new ones. The Central Committee must follow the youth press and allot to the youth organization special pages in the central party publications. In the trade unions the party must back up the demands of the young workers in accordance with its program.

13) In the co-operatives the Communists shall defend the principle of a unified national organization and create Communist groups attached to the co-operative section of the Communist International through a commission functioning under the Central Committee. In every federation a special commission must be created to carry on party work in the co-operatives. The Communists will exert every effort to utilize the co-operatives as an auxiliary force in the labour movement.

14) Our members in parliament, in the municipal councils, etc., must conduct an energetic struggle intimately bound up with the struggles of the workers and the campaigns undertaken by the party and the trade-union organizations outside parliament. In accordance with the theses of the Second Congress of the Comintern, the Communist deputies, controlled and directed by the party’s Central Committee, together with the municipal and district councillors, controlled and directed by the sections and the federations must serve the party as agents of agitation and propaganda.

15) The party must perfect and strengthen its organization following the example of the large Communist parties of other countries and in accordance with the statutes of the Communist International, in order that it may rise to the level of the tasks outlined in its program and by the national and international congresses, and be in a condition to realize these tasks in life. It must fight for a strict centralization, an inflexible discipline, the subordination of every party member to the corresponding party body, of each party body to the organization immediately above it. Moreover, we must develop the Marxist education of our militants by systematically increasing the number of theoretical courses in the sections, by opening party schools; and these courses and schools must be placed under the supervision of a Central Commission attached to the Central Committee.

Notes
1This program of action was adopted unanimously at the 32nd session of the Fourth World Congress, December 5, 1922.
2. The series of treaties listed here were imposed by the victorious powers in World War I on the various members of the defeated coalition led by Germany.
The treaty of St. Germain was concluded on September 10, 1919, between the Entente and Austria. According to the terms of this treaty Austria was dismembered, yielding parts of her territory to Italy, Czechoslovakia, Poland, Rumania, etc. Austria’s industry and finances were placed under the control of an "international" reparations’ committee.
The treaty of Neuilly was concluded between the Entente and Bulgaria on November 27, 1919. By the terms of this pact Bulgaria lost sections of her territory to Greece and Yugoslavia, particularly along the Aegean shore line. Bulgaria was obliged to pay reparations, expenses for the occupation troops and the like.
The treaty of Trianon was concluded between the Entente and Hungary on July 4, 1920. Hungary ceded slices of her territory to Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia. This treaty set down no fixed reparations, Hungary’s economy being placed under the control of a special commission.
The treaty of Sevres was concluded between the Entente and Turkey on August 10, 1920. Turkey was deprived of two-thirds of her territory. All the rights of German and Austrian investors were annulled. Great Britain’s influence in the Middle East was recognized as supreme. The struggle by the Ankara government which then followed and which was supported by the USSR brought this rapacious treaty to nothing.

Die Neue Zeit
10th October 2008, 06:14
Wait a minute. Aren't you a Maoist or something (you critiqued the Avakianites in at least three threads).

Red_Dialectics
10th October 2008, 20:52
One need not be a Maoist to criticize them.

Jay Rothermel
10th October 2008, 22:06
I think that whether we call ourselves Maoists, Trotskyists, Leninists, or whatever, the fundamental concepts in this breif essay by Trotsky, which he delivered on behalf of the Comintern to assist the French comrades with building their party, is the way to go.

Emphasis on communists working in the unions and social movements, joining with developing vanguard leadership in their ranks, and attempting to win these struggles to a higher political level of struggle is the only way to "hasten while awaiting" (Avakian term) and the only way to win the best mass leaders to becoming the best members of a communist party.

Trotsky here is not telling the French comrades to build their party by building a culture of appreciation around the ideas of himself, Lenin, or anyone else; that IS the message of the RCP Manifesto and classes on it I have attended. Trotsky on behalf of the Comintern leadership is saying build a communist party the way the Bolsheviks did. The only way it can be done: by finding the human material among the best leaders of the mass movement as we try to move unions and mass organizations (no matter what their current size) in a class struggle, class independence direction.

Young people attracted to communism because of campus or work-place experience cannot go far wrong if they keep these 15 points before them as they seek to work as communists in the world.

The question of the party is the question of questions. If we don't take it seriously, no one will take us seriously as communists, and we will be dismissed as undependable amateurs.

Jay Rothermel
4th March 2009, 04:45
http://www.laborstandard.org/New_Postings/Being_A_Leninist.htm

Being a Leninist Today

by Paul Le Blanc


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

An important new collection of writings by Vladimir Ilyich Lenin has just been published by Pluto Press under the title Revolution, Democracy, Socialism: Selected Writings, edited by a former editor of Bulletin in Defense of Marxism (the predecessor of this journal) and a frequent writer for Labor Standard, Paul Le Blanc.

Paul discusses his views on the contemporary relevance of Lenin’s ideas in this article written especially for Labor Standard.

It is possible to review the table of contents, a portion of the editor’s introductory essay, and the index at the following: http://www.amazon.com/Revolution-Democracy-Socialism-Selected-Political/dp/0745327605

****

With the recent publication of a book of writings by Vladimir Ilyich Lenin, Revolution, Democracy, Socialism, Selected Writings (London: Pluto Press, 2008), which I have edited, I have hoped to help generate discussion and debate about which way forward in the struggle for socialism. As I argue in my introduction to that volume, Lenin’s ideas remain relevant to our time. I have made that argument more than once in the pages of this journal, and I am hoping that readers will consider these ideas and move beyond words in order to help bring the ideas to life.

The necessity of a working-class revolution to bring about a socialist democracy in the United States and globally has never been more urgent than today.

But this does not mean that it is possible to carry out such a revolution today. Asserting that we cannot achieve our goal today is hardly a refutation of the need and possibility of the goal. It is, in fact, one of the starting-points to eventually being able to accomplish that which is urgently necessary. We need to be actively involved in a process to create the conditions for the triumph of workers’ power. These are ABCs of what Karl Marx called scientific socialism. Only foolish sectarians, or people who are ignorant of Marxism, are incapable of understanding this. The approach of Lenin has much to teach us about how to engage, as revolutionary activists, in practical struggles in the relatively non-revolutionary here and now — to help win short-term gains for the workers and the oppressed in a manner that advances the revolutionary cause.

Similarly, the necessity of building a revolutionary party in the United States, rooted in the perspectives of Marx and Lenin, has never been more urgent than today. But such a party cannot be brought about through the proclamations of a handful of well-meaning people. Here too, we will have to be engaged in a process — recognizing that while we make history, we do not make history exactly as we wish. We must function under circumstances not of our own choosing, and the realities that we encounter today are sometimes quite different from those of bygone eras. The realities of 1919, a year of global revolutionary upsurge by mass workers’ movements, are not the same as the realities of which we are a part in 2009.

It is worth reminding ourselves of Lenin’s argument in Left-Wing Communism, an Infantile Disorder that there are three necessary conditions for a genuinely revolutionary party. First is the revolutionary class-consciousness of a vanguard layer of the working class. Second is a correct political strategy and tactics on the part of organized revolutionaries. Third is an intimate and sustained contact “with the broadest masses of working people.” Without these conditions being met, Lenin tells us, all attempts at a disciplined revolutionary party will “inevitably fall flat and end up in phrase-mongering and clowning.” (See the relevant excerpt in Revolution, Democracy and Socialism, 306.) For the most part, revolutionary Marxists in the United States today cannot honestly say that either the first or the third of these necessary conditions exists for a crystallization of what Lenin himself would have considered a serious revolutionary party.

A very large part of my own political life from the 1970s down to the present moment has been devoted to contributing, as best I can, to advancing processes that might lead to the coming into being of a U.S. equivalent to a genuinely Leninist party — a mass working-class party that is democratic and cohesive, informed by Marxist theory and committed to the socialist goal. A fairly succinct summary of my views were elicited, recently, with the assistance of Mary Scully, who was once a good comrade in the Socialist Workers Party and Fourth Internationalist Tendency (organizations to which we both belonged) and who disagreed with the understanding and application of Leninist perspectives that I developed.

This apparently “controversial” conception is rooted in my book Lenin and the Revolutionary Party and in the lengthy essay I wrote entitled “Leninism in the United States and the Decline of the Socialist Workers Party,” which is contained in the volume I edited for the FIT in 1992, In Defense of American Trotskyism: Revolutionary Principles and Working-Class Democracy and, with slight revisions, in the collections of essays by George Breitman, Alan Wald and myself, Trotskyism in the United States: Historical Essays and Reconsiderations (and can be found in the Encyclopedia of Trotskyism On-Line in the section of FIT documents).

Comrade Scully’s contention, over the years, has been that my views involve equating Leninism with sectarianism and diverge from the basics of revolutionary Marxism. In arguing this, it seems to me that she has distorted essential elements of what I actually think and say. She has also claimed (more than once) that I have never responded to her criticisms. In fact, I did respond, with a very substantial article, “Culture, Consciousness, and Class Struggle: Further Notes on the relevance of Leninism,” in the April 1994 issue of the journal Bulletin in Defense of Marxism, later renamed Labor Standard (which I edited at the time), immediately after we published her original two-part polemic.*

More recently, in an on-line discussion list in the summer of 2008, in preparation for a conference on revolutionary traditions of Leon Trotsky and U.S. Trotskyism, Comrade Scully intervened with a repetition and elaboration of her old charges. At one point, she challenged me with five questions (and later an additional two). I sought to utilize her initial five questions in order to clarify, in a serious, succinct, and comradely manner, what my views are. I am reproducing the questions and answers below (followed by a few concluding comments).


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

My thanks to Mary for her good and helpful questions.

1) Can you elaborate on what the “present conditions” are that prohibit the formation of a Leninist party?

The primary condition preventing the formation of a revolutionary vanguard party is the fact that a revolutionary vanguard layer of the working class does not exist.

2) How do Marxists organize themselves to change these “present conditions” in order to be able to build a genuine Leninist party? Do we merely engage in “doing good work”? (Whatever that means!)

I think Marxists should try to build an organization (based on a revolutionary Marxist program, and functioning according to principles expressed most consistently by Lenin) which, at the same time, recognizes that it is not “the party” or even “the nucleus of the party.” And yes, all the work the organization does, and that individual Marxists do, should be good — not bad, not mediocre, not “let’s pretend.” They should develop research, education, political action projects of various kinds, giving special attention to the recruitment and development of cadre (i.e., knowledgeable, skilled, dedicated Marxist activists) and to the development of a labor-radical subculture that is essential for the development of a revolutionary vanguard layer of the working class.

3) Why is it so that those who seek to build a Leninist party will only create a sect? Isn’t sectarianism (per Marxist history) based on estrangement from the working class?

Those who claim to be members of a revolutionary vanguard party — independently of a revolutionary vanguard layer of the working class — are pretending to be members of such a party, creating a little organizational universe of their own, disconnected from the actual lives and struggles and consciousness of the working class. This is a definition of a sect and of sectarianism — as you note, “estrangement from the working class,” in the form of a so-called Leninist party.

4) Exactly how should we organize ourselves to promote the recomposition of this revolutionary layer of the working class? Who is this layer of the working class? Are they white male industrial workers? Are they immigrant workers? Are they nurses, teachers? Who?

The revolutionary layer of the working class is not defined by occupation, by race or ethnicity or place of birth, by gender. It is defined by consciousness (by the level of class-consciousness it has attained), as well as by its organizational skills and its influence within the working class.

There is a very good preliminary discussion of this in Lenin’s 1899 article “A Retrograde Trend in the Russian Social-Democracy,” which is in his Collected Works, vol. 4, especially pages 280–282. (I summarize this in my book Lenin and the Revolutionary Party, pages 44–46, and I share more extensive background information on the reality of what Lenin is talking about in various sections of that book.) Lenin distinguishes between a relatively small layer of “advanced workers” and a larger layer of what he calls “average workers” — and both of these layers are genuinely class-conscious, and a further distinction is made between these and what he calls “the mass that constitutes the lower strata of the proletariat.”

Exactly how should we organize ourselves (in my view) is suggested in my response to question #2. The question of what specific sectors and struggles such an organization should engage with to help promote the recomposition of a revolutionary layer of the working class is not something that can be adequately determined by two individuals on a discussion list — but that is precisely a question that should grappled with by an organization of revolutionaries. As individuals, we simply need to do the best we can (good work) where we happen to be.

5) Only the existence of what layer can provide the basis of a genuine revolutionary party? Could you be more specific? Who are these workers? What do they do? Why are they so pivotal? Why do they exclude the mobilizations in the millions of unorganized, undocumented workers?

Only the existence of a layer of the working class with a certain level of class consciousness (what Lenin called “advanced workers,” who have a connection with and authority among the class-conscious “average” workers that he spoke of) can provide the basis of a genuine revolutionary party. So the question is, what kind of consciousness are we talking about?

“A struggle is going on in all the nations of the civilized world, between the oppressors and the oppressed of all countries, a struggle between the capitalist and the laborer, which grows in intensity from year to year, and will work disastrous results to the toiling millions, if they are not combined for mutual protection and benefit.”

This elementary class-consciousness (expressed in the founding preamble of the American Federation of Labor), combined with the three best known verses of Ralph Chaplin’s “Solidarity Forever,” combined with the basic principles in the Communist Manifesto and some sense of the history of the class struggle — that is the level of consciousness that I think Lenin was talking about.

Without a working-class vanguard layer that has this level of class-consciousness, there will be no revolutionary vanguard party. There can be vitally important mass mobilizations an insurgencies around many things (immigrant rights, women’s rights, opposition to racism, opposition to war, opposition to the degradation of our environment, etc.) without an organized vanguard layer of the working class having this level of consciousness. But there cannot be the revolutionary vanguard party that we need without it.

Why are such workers so pivotal? The whole of Lenin’s writings — from the 1899 “A Retrograde Trend…” (referred to above) to the 1920 Left-Wing Communism, an Infantile Disorder and beyond — explains why. Those who would build a Leninist party could do worse than to reflect on Lenin’s answers to this key question.

The times we live in are extraordinary. There has been a radicalization process going on for more than two decades, impacting in diverse and contradictory ways on the massive, multi-faceted, diverse U.S. working class. There is an accumulation of experiences (and more are on the way) that are opening up opportunities for the development of the kind of revolutionary class consciousness and for the recomposition of the accompanying labor-radical subculture that it will take to sustain a revolutionary vanguard layer of the working class.

If we are serious about wanting to build a Leninist party — a real one, not a pretend one — then our priority must be to do all that we can (all the good work that we can, not shoddy, mediocre work or “revolutionary” posturing) to advance that process. As individuals we must do what we can where we are. But we also need to build effective organizations (not pretend “Parties” that create their own little revolutionary universes), organizations that can help Marxist activists do what needs to be done at this present conjuncture.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In reaction to the above, Mary wrote the following:

Paul, are you refuting (with your exegesis of Lenin’s writings) Leon Trotsky’s insistence now over 60 years ago that the overwhelming evidence from American politics is that the conditions for revolutionary action are not premature; rather they are “overripe”?

More importantly, are you refuting his insistence that the existence of a revolutionary party was a “colossal factor” in the political maturity of the working class?

In response to each question, I replied with one word: “No.” Comrade Scully then wrote:

“No” isn’t particularly elucidating. Your view that we have to wait for the development of Leninist class consciousness before we embark on the project of a Leninist party, seems to contradict Trotsky’s view that a Leninist party is a “colossal factor” in class consciousness. Elaboration, beyond “no” is required. Don’t you think?

To which (by now impatient and needing to move on to other work, particularly around the conference I was helping to organize) I responded: “No.”

But Mary was certainly right in urging me to elaborate. I will make up for that here.

First of all, it seems obvious to me, as a Leninist and Trotskyist, that the realities of 1918 or 1938 (or, for that matter, 1993–94) were different in important ways from the realities of 2008, and now 2009. It makes no sense — in stark contradiction to the method of Marx and Lenin — to blur this all together in an ahistorical polemic disconnected from what is happening and what is to be done.

Lenin’s method and positions were different from this, and despite Mary’s unintentional implication, it seems to me that nothing in Trotsky is in contradiction to the Leninist method and positions. Seven decades after Trotsky’s Transitional Program, the specific realities of the workers’ movement, the specific consciousness of the working class, and the specific tasks we face as revolutionaries, are not exactly the same. We can and must do things now (doing good political work, not passively waiting) to help create certain conditions. This would involve the spread and deepening of mass working-class consciousness, which is the precondition for the revolutionary party that will be capable of changing the world.

In order to do such work, it seems to me that those of us who see such things as necessary must join with like-minded people in organizations that can recruit activists and train cadre, and participate in the struggles of our time, by utilizing the critical, creative political orientation of Lenin, Trotsky, Luxemburg, and others who are part of the living revolutionary socialist tradition of Marxism.

At the present moment — 2009 — new opportunities are opening up which give a greater urgency to such organizational engagement. Of course, joining such organizations is not the same as joining the revolutionary party that might be capable of bringing about socialism. The primary task of the various revolutionary socialist organizations must be to help create the preconditions for the emergence of such a party.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* I will be happy to send scans or photocopies of those articles to anyone who is interested, along with the earlier two-part article that she was attacking, “Notes on Building a Revolutionary Party in the United States,” which appeared in the June and July-August issues of