Log in

View Full Version : Nativism and Populism, the key ingredients to electoral success for the far-right



spartan
8th October 2008, 04:52
The two things I see most from far-right parties getting bigger shares of the vote in Europe are Nativism and Populism.

The Nativism is used to create opposition to immigrants from "native" (hence the Nativism) working-class people who are *turns into a Nativist* "losing their jobs, having to accept lower wages because of the influx of cheaper labour, and having their public services (which they, and not the immigrants who use them anyway, prop up with their taxes) suffer under the strain of the increase in population which immigration naturally produces."

The Nativism allows these once avid racists a chance to play at "socially acceptable" Xenophobia without any dire consequences, indeed even being applauded by people sick and tired of political correctness and pussy footing around issues which they deem important.

The Populism is used to create an "us" and "them" atmosphere against their own country's ruling elite and traditional parties who they say are "alike" and "not representing our intrests" which to be fair they are right about that.

The Populism also allows them to appear "Socialistic" (especially with their worker friendly economic policies such as cooperatives and nationalisation) and is a good way to shut the left out from the working-class.

These far-right parties are tapping into genuine (misdirected) anger from working-class people and it's proving quite beneficial as they are getting more and more votes (just look at Austria where the two far-right parties collectively got the highest share of the national vote in the recent elections!).

How do we as Socialists combat this growing threat?

Working-class people don't seem intrested in what we have to say and our solutions to their problems, and are more intrested in blaming the immigrant and electing people who used to go around with Nazi flags about a decade ago before they "wised-up" and started offering easy to implement solutions to working-class people and their country's problems.

One of the things that scares me the most about these far-right parties is that they are doing things legitimately and Democratically, and are getting more votes and potentially into positions of real power with the majority of people's support!

Most normal people don't like violence and the far-right know this and play the victim card whenever anti-Fascists shoot themselves in the foot by attacking these people at their events which have been approved by the police and local government and mean that the far-right are thus doing nothing wrong in the public's eyes (which gives us a bad name for attacking "peaceful law-abiding people at a legal event" blah blah blah, etc, etc).

We have to change tactics on these smart break-away racists as ironically violence aimed at them by us is actually helping them and hurting us!

Nativism:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nativism_(politics)

Populism:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Populism

Die Neue Zeit
8th October 2008, 06:51
^^^ The BNP recently praised private property, though.

Maybe you can chip in on my Antifa thread regarding the redefinition of "fascism." I used "colonial," "national," and "social" as adjectives. Is "nativist" more precise than "national"? :(

I have one possible solution: STOP ISSUING LOWEST-COMMON-DENOMINATOR IMMEDIATE DEMANDS!

http://deleonism.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=351&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0

[Do you think any "social-democratic" or social-fascist party would raise the immediate demands raised in the link?]

spartan
9th October 2008, 00:07
^^^ The BNP recently praised private property, though.
Really!?!?!

Do you have a link showing this perchance?


Maybe you can chip in on my Antifa thread regarding the redefinition of "fascism." I used "colonial," "national," and "social" as adjectives. Is "nativist" more precise than "national"? :(

To be honest I think Nativist can be considered apart of "national".

These far-right parties using Nativism to a great success were largely unashamed white Nationalists before they abandoned the obviously unrealistic goals of racial war/revolution for electioneering and acceptable Nativist Patriotism.

This allows them to basically say the same things they have always said using more acceptable terminology which appeals to the misdirected anger of working-class people (which is reinforced by the gutter press).

For example the BNP talk of "preserving British culture" which is there way of saying "the white race" and they constantly attack "muslims" and "Islam" when what they really want to say is "pakis" which they would have happily done a decade ago before they "wised-up" under Griffin.

Holden Caulfield
9th October 2008, 00:20
perhaps people would like to also give this a gander as JR said ;

http://www.revleft.com/vb/redefining-fascism-national-t86851/index.html

Raúl Duke
9th October 2008, 03:03
In the U.S. I've probably seen nativism being used by U.S.'s right (GOP; the far-right factions in the U.S. are not electorically successful) but rarely have I seen them appear socialistic...actually they use socialism/communism as a slur on liberals...

Die Neue Zeit
9th October 2008, 03:09
Really!?!?!

Do you have a link showing this perchance?

http://www.cpgb.org.uk/worker/739/antibig.html


As for the BNP, it makes clear that, though supporting private enterprise “since its inception”, it has “strongly opposed the drive towards a global financial system”. Such a system has “no allegiance to our nation’s requirements”, because it serves “only the bankers’ interests”. The BNP claims credit for predicting eventual financial disaster.