Log in

View Full Version : American arrogance



LeonardoDaVinci
4th April 2003, 09:03
The US government has passed a bill banning France, Germany and Russia from all rebuilding bids.

I think they missed one fucking point, they can do that if it was America. However, they can't tell the people in the new 'democratic and free' Iraq which countries to do business with and which countries to dismiss. Hell, if I was an Iraqi alcoholic I'll be pissed off if they told me that I have to drink shitty American wine and vodka. Isn't it my democratic right to enjoy a good glass of french wine or a strong shot of Russian vodka when I want to?

Liberty Lover
4th April 2003, 10:01
Spam, spam, lovely spam,
Wonderful spam, lovely spam

Spam, spam, magnificent spam,
Superlative spam

Spam, spam, wonderous spam,
Surgical spam, splendiferous spam

kelvin90701
5th April 2003, 05:10
Do we really care what the frenchies and ruskies think at this point? Do the Iraqi care?

Anti communist
5th April 2003, 05:38
Leo, the US/UK CAN decide who will rebuild Iraq but not due to arrogance. The reason is because all this rebuilding and humanitarian aid, not to mention the billions the war will cost will be paid for by the coallition gov'ts, not the impotent, incompetent, anti American, new world order wishing, murderous dictator loving, non resolution enforcing, American wealth wanna be redistributing...............................drum roll please...............................France and United Nations.

The UN didn't want to take action, so they shouldn't have a say in what happens there after the war.
Since the coallition gov'ts paid for it all, and they are the ones that will liberate the Iraqi people, they have a say on who can rebuild afterwards.

The money that Iraq will make from oil sales now that Saddam can't line his pockets, will help pay for this humanitarian aid and rebuilding also.

If the coallition gov'ts paid for the war/rebuilding, then it makes sense that they give the bussiness to companies in their respective countries so the money that the coallition is paying here, gets recycled back into their economies instead of the economy of countries that did nothing to help. That way we aren't paying for the war and also paying other countries to rebuild. They would never recoop any money that way.

(Edited by Anti communist at 6:46 am on April 5, 2003)

Xvall
5th April 2003, 18:22
The UN didn't want to take action, so they shouldn't have a say in what happens there after the war.
Since the coallition gov'ts paid for it all, and they are the ones that will liberate the Iraqi people, they have a say on who can rebuild afterwards.

Oh I get it; see it's perfectly understandable if I go to your house and blow it up so I can liberate your children. And then, of course, since I spent all that money to buy the explosives to blow up your house, even though the entire community was against that; I then get to choose what happens to the rubble? You don't make any sense at all.

Bodacious
5th April 2003, 19:47
very interesting tho.

If you notice and pay attention why the French on one side are crying so loud now and the Russian's are backing down there tone. Could it be that the French fear the document's we found could be traced back ? surely not. Could it be that the Pentagon has fragments of cornsilk Russian made missle's that hit a few of our M1 tank's? surely not all this was banned by the UN what was I thinking.

Anti communist
5th April 2003, 20:27
Drake, you analogy is way off. We are doing this for 2 reasons. 1)Disarm Saddam, 2)Liberate the people and get rid of Saddam's regime.

Did you see the coffins that were found today with human remains? I can't wait for the documents, the banned weapons, the torture and murder body count, the horror stories from the civilians of Saddams brutality, all come to light. And all the evidence that links France, Germany, and Russia to Saddam also despite sanctions.

Zombie
5th April 2003, 20:34
Quote: from Anti communist on 4:27 pm on April 5, 2003
Drake, you analogy is prefecto. We are doing this for 2 reasons. 1)Get as much oil as we can, 2)Rule with godly supremacy over the ME once and for all.

Did you see the coffins that were found today with human remains? I can't wait for the documents, the banned weapons, the torture and murder body count, the horror stories from the civilians of Saddams brutality, all come to light. And all the evidence that links the United States of America to Saddam also despite sanctions.

Anti communist
5th April 2003, 20:43
Nice try zombie.

Zombie
5th April 2003, 20:45
Anytime lad.

Invader Zim
5th April 2003, 20:57
The UN didn't want to take action,


The UN is not a nation retard... It is a collection of nations. Of which the USA is a member so saying that the UN did not want to take action is complete shit... As large preportions of it did. Like the UK and the USA.

Could you actually lern what you are talking about please, its just i cant be bothered correcting your fucking stupid errors any more.