Saorsa
29th September 2008, 09:47
http://mikeely.wordpress.com/2008/09/28/to-prachanda-in-a-hostile-world-how-are-you-going-to-do-it/
To Prachanda: In a Hostile World, How Are You Going to Do It? (http://mikeely.wordpress.com/2008/09/28/to-prachanda-in-a-hostile-world-how-are-you-going-to-do-it/)
Posted by Mike E (http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1129785784) on September 28, 2008
An initial transcription of one question asked of Prachanda (http://mikeely.wordpress.com/2008/09/27/prachanda-nyc-speech-a-maoist-vision-for-a-new-nepal/)at New York's New School Eventv (Thanks to Artemio (http://mikeely.wordpress.com/2008/09/27/prachanda-nyc-speech-a-maoist-vision-for-a-new-nepal/#comment-7488)).
Photos are available from Jon (http://flickr.com/photos/jonprc/sets/72157607540392093/) of Kasama/Philadelphia.
Question from the Floor:
Lal Saalam. It's a very exciting time in Nepal. You are carrying out a national democratic revolution. You are also the first communist to become head of state in many years, in my lifetime — and I am not a young man.
How do you plan to reconcile the serious tasks of national democratic, even new democratic revolution in nepal with the crisis the world is going under — considering the actions of the United States government, the Europeans, and the hegemonists who believe a handful of nations can dominate the rest of the world into backwardness?
How you gonna do it?
PM Prachanda answers:
Concrete analysis of concrete conditions is the soul of Marxism. What we are doing is concrete analysis of concrete conditions and we are devising our policy and program according to the changed situation of the first decade of the 21st century.
And what we are doing, as Prof. Arato also raised this question– very savily and very provocatively, you know. I understand the depth of history and dynamics of its expression you know. But what we are doing in the first decades of the 21st century is concrete analysis of concrete conditions. We are trying to understand the whole phenomenon of the change, the revolution and development of communication and electronic sciences, and the change that occur.
Time and again, when i have a serious debate and discussion with intellectuals from developed countries, many western intellectuals. Time and again I say that we are trying to understand the changed phenomenon, and we are trying to develop our ideology according to the changed situation.
But you always blame us from very sectarian and dogmatic, and very self centered understanding. I try to have a serious debate and discussion with that kind of intellectual. Why we can't have multiparty competition? Why we have raised the questions of election constituent assembly. Why we participate in government and the radical change, and radical restructuring of the state.
According to my understanding, this is the development of ideology. This is the development of science itself. And we do not want to be rigid, to be static, to be sectarian and dogmatic. We want to be more vibrant.
Discussions during War
When we were in the war itself, just after the initiation of the war, 5 years after the initiation of war, we had a serious debate and disucussion inside our ranks, one and a half years of debate about the democracy. Either we should support multiparty competition or not.
[unclear]
We devised this multi party competition while we were in the war. We were waging war and we were victorious at that time, you know.
At that time we have a serious discussion and what we devised is that if Lenin had lived another 5 or 10 years he would also introduce multiparty competition, this is my understanding. (Applause, few words from Prahanda unclear).. so creative and so dynamic that, during this New Economic Policy, just after the October Revolution and this War Communism had finished, and the civil war had finished, he introduced NEP, this NEP was in essence a capitalistic economic policy. He gave the slogan" Organize Socialist Competition in the Economy"… When he introduced the slogan of organizing competition in the economy. If he would have lived another 5 years he would have introduced competition in politics.
Therefore it is not something we are suprisingly making this multiparty competition. Because Stalin had made a serious mistake of ideology, in philosophy, in science- and all of the workers movement has taken so much loss from this deviation from dialectal materialism. This is our understanding — what we think and believe.
We are fully confident that we are developing the ideology from Lenin, not from Stalin. And this multi-party competiton is the product of that ideological development.
Thank You.
To Prachanda: In a Hostile World, How Are You Going to Do It? (http://mikeely.wordpress.com/2008/09/28/to-prachanda-in-a-hostile-world-how-are-you-going-to-do-it/)
Posted by Mike E (http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1129785784) on September 28, 2008
An initial transcription of one question asked of Prachanda (http://mikeely.wordpress.com/2008/09/27/prachanda-nyc-speech-a-maoist-vision-for-a-new-nepal/)at New York's New School Eventv (Thanks to Artemio (http://mikeely.wordpress.com/2008/09/27/prachanda-nyc-speech-a-maoist-vision-for-a-new-nepal/#comment-7488)).
Photos are available from Jon (http://flickr.com/photos/jonprc/sets/72157607540392093/) of Kasama/Philadelphia.
Question from the Floor:
Lal Saalam. It's a very exciting time in Nepal. You are carrying out a national democratic revolution. You are also the first communist to become head of state in many years, in my lifetime — and I am not a young man.
How do you plan to reconcile the serious tasks of national democratic, even new democratic revolution in nepal with the crisis the world is going under — considering the actions of the United States government, the Europeans, and the hegemonists who believe a handful of nations can dominate the rest of the world into backwardness?
How you gonna do it?
PM Prachanda answers:
Concrete analysis of concrete conditions is the soul of Marxism. What we are doing is concrete analysis of concrete conditions and we are devising our policy and program according to the changed situation of the first decade of the 21st century.
And what we are doing, as Prof. Arato also raised this question– very savily and very provocatively, you know. I understand the depth of history and dynamics of its expression you know. But what we are doing in the first decades of the 21st century is concrete analysis of concrete conditions. We are trying to understand the whole phenomenon of the change, the revolution and development of communication and electronic sciences, and the change that occur.
Time and again, when i have a serious debate and discussion with intellectuals from developed countries, many western intellectuals. Time and again I say that we are trying to understand the changed phenomenon, and we are trying to develop our ideology according to the changed situation.
But you always blame us from very sectarian and dogmatic, and very self centered understanding. I try to have a serious debate and discussion with that kind of intellectual. Why we can't have multiparty competition? Why we have raised the questions of election constituent assembly. Why we participate in government and the radical change, and radical restructuring of the state.
According to my understanding, this is the development of ideology. This is the development of science itself. And we do not want to be rigid, to be static, to be sectarian and dogmatic. We want to be more vibrant.
Discussions during War
When we were in the war itself, just after the initiation of the war, 5 years after the initiation of war, we had a serious debate and disucussion inside our ranks, one and a half years of debate about the democracy. Either we should support multiparty competition or not.
[unclear]
We devised this multi party competition while we were in the war. We were waging war and we were victorious at that time, you know.
At that time we have a serious discussion and what we devised is that if Lenin had lived another 5 or 10 years he would also introduce multiparty competition, this is my understanding. (Applause, few words from Prahanda unclear).. so creative and so dynamic that, during this New Economic Policy, just after the October Revolution and this War Communism had finished, and the civil war had finished, he introduced NEP, this NEP was in essence a capitalistic economic policy. He gave the slogan" Organize Socialist Competition in the Economy"… When he introduced the slogan of organizing competition in the economy. If he would have lived another 5 years he would have introduced competition in politics.
Therefore it is not something we are suprisingly making this multiparty competition. Because Stalin had made a serious mistake of ideology, in philosophy, in science- and all of the workers movement has taken so much loss from this deviation from dialectal materialism. This is our understanding — what we think and believe.
We are fully confident that we are developing the ideology from Lenin, not from Stalin. And this multi-party competiton is the product of that ideological development.
Thank You.