Log in

View Full Version : The Legacy of Comrade Enver Hoxha



TheRedRevolutionary
29th September 2008, 02:54
April 11 - 6th Anniversary of the Death of Comrade Enver Hoxha
Consistent Fighter against Revisionism

Six years ago, on April 11, 1985, Comrade Enver Hoxha died, the great leader of the Party of Labor of Albania, the stubborn fighter against every deviation from Marxism (revisionism), against every degeneration of socialism. Especially today, when his statues are being torn down in Albania and his politics are being thrown overboard, we wish to honor him on the anniversary of his death, by showing some essential aspects of his politics and his achievements.
[Enver Hoxha in his youth experienced the oppression and exploitation of Albania by the numerous occupiers and great powers, and joined the democratic movement, for which he spent some time in jail.
[He spent some time in France, where he was a sympathizer with the CP of France, and published articles in "Humanite" on the Zog regime. He also worked in the Albanian Consulate in Belgium, but was dismissed by Zog's agents, and returned to Albania in 1936.
[The years of struggle had formed Enver Hoxha into a communist. While a teacher in a high school in Korca he became an activist in the communist group of Korca. After the Italian occupation of Albania, by the decision of the group, Hoxha moved to Tirana to develop the anti-fascist struggle. He worked to unite the various communist groups and to found the Communist Party.
[The Albanian Communists struggled actively against fascism, they organized the popular resistance and fought as partisans in the mountains. But the splintering hindered the struggle, and had to be overcome.]
The Communist Party [Enver Hoxha understood clearly the necessity of building a united, conscious and battle-hardened Party. On November 8, 1941, at a conference of the communist groups of Albania in Tirana, the Communist Party was founded.
[The CPA, which later became the PLA, organized a National Liberation Army to carry out armed struggle against fascism. Besides the CPA, there was no other party or force in Albania that pursued this goal. The CPA made this the goal, not only of the workers, but also of the peasants and handicrafts people.
[In the fight against first the Italian and then the German fascists, 28,000 Albanians were killed, 7.3% of the population were killed or severely wounded, 21% of the houses were destroyed, a third of the livestock were killed, and the few bridges, factories, etc. were destroyed or damaged.]
The Liberation of Albania [Although 700,000 fascist soldiers set foot on Albanian soil, they were defeated. Comrade Enver Hoxha stood at the head of the CPA and the National Liberation Army. People's Councils were elected. Finally, on November 28, 1944, the Albanian Democratic Government took power. The decades long struggle of the Albanian people for independence and freedom was crowned with success.
[Enver Hoxha and the CPA and the Albanian people had an immense task before them. The Zog regime and the fascists had left nothing behind. There was more than 90% illiteracy, hardly any schools, no industry, etc. Whoever had any bread was considered rich. There were the most reactionary, medieval ideologies and customs such as feuds, feudal relations existed, and women were treated as slaves.
[The Albanian Communists and Enver Hoxha were not daunted, and did what was needed to provide the most urgent necessities for the people. Grain and irrigation were developed to ensure bread. Schools were constructed and skilled workers were trained to provide a minimum of culture and education. Factories, hydroelectric power plants and railroads were built, and the first steps were taken towards creating a modern industry. Health care and hygiene were developed, and doctors and nurses were trained.
[The successes of the first years of the building of the People's Republic surpassed the development of the previous decades many times over. The people had lived in hunger and poverty. Now the country awoke, lived and stepped boldly forward.]
Permanent Struggle [The Albanian Party soon learned that not everyone who calls himself a communist is one in actuality. Tito had sold himself to Western capital. He wanted to turn Albania into a Yugoslav province. He became an agent of capital in the socialist camp, who wanted to establish his revisionism, his treason to Marxism, in all communist parties.
[The PLA and Albania were directly threatened. Tito and his people already had groups in Albania. Comrade Enver Hoxha defended Marxism against Tito's attack as well as the independence of Albania and the PLA. Together with Stalin and the Communist Information Bureau he lead a resolute struggle against Tito's betrayal.

[B]Modern Albania [Under Enver Hoxha's leadership Albanian industry and agriculture were continuously developed. The production of their own spare parts, the development of their own power supply, the electrification, their own first steel, an expanding raw materials industry, a growing rail network, their own first tractors - these were all victories. Under Enver Hoxha's leadership Albania moved from a semi-feudal country to an industrial-agricultural one.
[All these successes could only be reached through socialism and a planned economy. Other developing countries could only dream of such successes. The planned economy made it possible to put the few economic reserves in the most important sectors. In Albania the plan was not something dead, but a call to arms. Clearly Albanian industry had not reached the level of the great Western imperialist economies. This was impossible in the conditions of the imperialist world market. But this makes the successes of socialist planned economy even more outstanding.
[The splendid economic development of Albania made social and cultural progress possible which is unthinkable even in many industrial countries. There were no taxes or inflation. Medical care was free and so good that Albania had the lowest infant mortality rate in Europe. Men could retire at 60 and women at 55. Everyone had a roof over their head, even if it was not luxurious. More than 70% of the youth had a high school education. Technical schools and the first university in the country, the Enver Hoxha University, were built. The list could be continued indefinitely.]
The Dictatorship of the Proletariat Under the leadership of Comrade Enver Hoxha socialism in Albania was constructed and the dictatorship of the proletariat was made a reality. This did not mean a dictatorship of the bureaucrats over the proletariat, but actual rule of the working class. They determined with their party the plan and the course. They could call to account representatives and directors, if they did not operate in the interests of the working people.
The Party consciously placed itself and the state apparatus under the control of the working people. They learned from the results of the degeneration of the Soviet Union and the East European countries. Cadres had to regularly take part in production. New Party members had to be examined carefully by their colleagues. Every functionary could be publicly criticized and had to publicly respond. The Party discussed all important problems with the masses. Only in this way could, the life threatening situations such as, for example, the attempt at annexation by Yugoslavia, the military threats of Khrushchev, the Chinese economic sabotage, be overcome.
Enver Hoxha was a front rank fighter for the close connection of the Albanian Party with the working masses. He struggled untiringly against every form of bureaucratism, all tendencies to degeneration...
Mistakes? Today Enver Hoxha is pictured in the bourgeois press as a monster, who bloodily suppressed a whole people. The same is done as with Stalin. Everywhere "mistakes" are spoken of and Enver's Albania is attacked.
Naturally Enver made mistakes. How could one have such a long life full of struggle without mistakes. Our Party thinks, for example, that Enver underestimated the economic foundations of revisionism and therefore did not fight them sufficiently. But we do not act as know-it-alls in this regard. We know from our own practice as a communist party who quickly one can make mistakes. And above all: the mistakes weigh nothing in comparison with the accomplishments and successes of Enver Hoxha. Under his leadership Albania was an inspiration for every progressive and revolutionary person in the whole world. Even an anti-communist wave in Albania can not in the long run darken the gains of Enver Hoxha for his country and the world revolution. On the contrary! The quick integration of present day Albania into the capitalist world market will soon bring forward the achievements of Albania under socialism. The shabby reality of reintroduced capitalism: unemployment, exploitation, dependency, poverty and hunger, will bring the work of Comrade Enver Hoxha more strongly to light.

Invader Zim
29th September 2008, 18:53
This kind of 'great man' historical approach is just poor.

http://www.revleft.com/vb/single-teaspoon-sugar-t77441/index.html?t=77441&highlight=sugar

Holden Caulfield
29th September 2008, 19:08
this kind of 'great man' historical approach is just poor.

qft

Hit The North
29th September 2008, 19:10
qft?

Sprinkles
29th September 2008, 19:13
qft?
Quoted for Truth.

Os Cangaceiros
29th September 2008, 20:36
Now, this may seem like a silly question, but it's one I've always wanted to ask: what's wrong, in the Marxist sense, with "revisionism"? Marx wrote his theories in the mid-19th century...are things no different today than they were then? And if they are different, don't his theories have to be "revised" to deal with reality?

Robespierre2.0
29th September 2008, 21:06
Now, this may seem like a silly question, but it's one I've always wanted to ask: what's wrong, in the Marxist sense, with "revisionism"? Marx wrote his theories in the mid-19th century...are things no different today than they were then? And if they are different, don't his theories have to be "revised" to deal with reality?

Communist theory, being dialectical, is supposed to develop as the material conditions of society do. Lenin took Marxism and adapted it to the age of Imperialism. Hoxha took Marxism and adapted it to a more recent era- the struggle between Marxism-Leninism and Eurocommunism.

Revisionism, rather than adapting to new circumstances, is removing important parts of Marxism for the sake of accomodating the bourgeoisie or for opportunism. As Marxism develops, you find different forms of revisionism unique to the era- In Lenin's time, the revisionists were the social democrats of the 2nd International who 'revised' Marxism, gutting it of all it's revolutionary elements. In the 30s, I'd say Trotskyists gutted Marxism in their own way (they may disagree and say Stalin did, but that's besides the point). In the 50s through 80s, the revisionists were the Eurocommunists- et cetera

Winter
29th September 2008, 21:17
Now, this may seem like a silly question, but it's one I've always wanted to ask: what's wrong, in the Marxist sense, with "revisionism"? Marx wrote his theories in the mid-19th century...are things no different today than they were then? And if they are different, don't his theories have to be "revised" to deal with reality?

Revisionism is bad because it takes pro-Marxist rhetoric and phrases to explicitly appear pro-Marxists but in reality they are anti-Marxist bourgeois opportunist imperialists. Just look at the "progress" Kruschshev and Tito brought for the cause of socialism.

Die Neue Zeit
29th September 2008, 21:18
^^^ The first major revisionist assault was Bernstein's assault against the very concept of class struggle!

JimmyJazz
30th September 2008, 02:40
they are anti-Marxist bourgeois opportunist imperialists

You forgot 'fascist'.

spartan
30th September 2008, 03:21
The legacy of Enver Hoxha?
http://jim.rees.org/trips/Albania/bunkers.jpg

I am sorry I couldn't resist that one, with the thread title and everything it was just crying out to be done.:lol:

By the way I agree with Invader Zim, this "great man" approach to history is not just poor but really frightening.

The fact that people still worship these obscure little men out of their own choice (rather then being forced to by societal norms like it was in Albania) is really scary.

RHIZOMES
30th September 2008, 03:40
The legacy of Enver Hoxha?
http://jim.rees.org/trips/Albania/bunkers.jpg

I am sorry I couldn't resist that one, with the thread title and everything it was just crying out to be done.:lol:

By the way I agree with Invader Zim, this "great man" approach to history is not just poor but really frightening.

The fact that people still worship these obscure little men out of their own choice (rather then being forced to by societal norms like it was in Albania) is really scary.

Yes it's totally scary to defend revolutionaries from bourgeoisie attacks.

Robespierre2.0
30th September 2008, 03:50
Why is it that Anarchists and Trots can circlejerk over obscure characters like Makhno and nobody bats an eye?

And you say that the people of Albania were forced to support their government leadership? You have an extremely cynical view of leftist politics- Whenever a leader like Stalin or Mao is admired by their people, you automatically assume it's because someone else is holding a gun to their head.

We uphold Hoxha because he made important additions to Marxist theory, and thus, yes, there is the possibility that he could be viewed as an icon like Mao.
However, Hoxhaists have a Marxist world-view, meaning that we acknowledge that material circumstances give rise to human ideas and not the other way around.
This means that had Hoxha died early or never been born in the first place, someone else would make the same developments to theory.

And in this parallel universe, Ghaffari-ists are banging their head against the keyboard every time someone heckles them for upholding an obscure Iranian dictator.

RHIZOMES
30th September 2008, 09:31
Why is it that Anarchists and Trots can circlejerk over obscure characters like Makhno and nobody bats an eye?

Because Makhno fought for FREEDUMZ against the EVUL BOLSHIE OPPRESSORS. While Hoxha ate babies for breakfast, lunch and dinner, had five million concubines, not to mention he'd go out in the middle of the night raping old ladies. Don't you read Robert Conquest?

Invader Zim
30th September 2008, 10:28
Because Makhno fought for FREEDUMZ against the EVUL BOLSHIE OPPRESSORS. While Hoxha ate babies for breakfast, lunch and dinner, had five million concubines, not to mention he'd go out in the middle of the night raping old ladies. Don't you read Robert Conquest?

You're confused; Conquest is a historian of the USSR, not Albania.

Small Geezer
30th September 2008, 11:46
I think what Arizona Bay is trying to say is that Robert Conquest would probably shit on Hoxhas' grave and try to portray him as unusually fiendish due to the fact he was a 'communist', as he did with Stalin.

Hoxha probably did quite a few good things on the anti-fascist and national liberation front. Perhaps he didn't do so well in allowing and assisting the basis for a a genuine participatory socialist democracy.

bcbm
30th September 2008, 11:55
Why is it that Anarchists and Trots can circlejerk over obscure characters like Makhno and nobody bats an eye?

Well, I haven't see too terribly many threads entitled "The Legacy of Comrade Nestor Makhno" that go on to ejaculate every little thing he ever did. And there's not even a thread about him in the first five pages of the history forum, although there are plenty of threads about figures equally irrelevant to the working classes today.

Armand Iskra
2nd October 2008, 05:08
Enver Hoxa can be considered as a good leader, since his leadership was based on socialism in an albanian manner. However, he also done mistakes being a leader of the state. And one of his mistakes is that he's more like a dogmatist. He cut off relations with the soviet union, yugoslavia, even china in spite of these countries are socialist.

But in spite of these mistakes, he's just doing a job for a socialist albania.

Lenin's Law
2nd October 2008, 16:27
Enver Hoxa can be considered as a good leader, since his leadership was based on socialism in an albanian manner.

Describe "socialism in an albanian manner"

Armand Iskra
2nd October 2008, 16:57
Describe "socialism in an albanian manner"

Socialism in An Albanian manner, in my own idea may likely to say that Enver Hoxha's road to socialism was more like applying nationalism into it. For at that time, especially during WW2, Nationalism is also encouraged by the left as a step in achieving socialism. Albanian nationalism perhaps can be a factor in achieving what Albanian socialism was at that time, especially during the times Enver Hoxha led his troops against the enemy during WW2, as well as in rebuilding the country.

As what he had said:

“ The sacrifices of our people were very great. Out of a population of one million, 28,000 were killed, 12,600 wounded, 10,000 were made political prisoners in Italy and Germany, and 35,000 made to do forced labour, of ground; all the communications, all the ports, mines and electric power installations were destroyed, our agriculture and livestock were plundered, and our entire national economy was wrecked.”

During his early leadership, Hoxha, being a patriot and a socialist at the same time may likely to set an "Albanian road to Socialism" with the help of the Soviet Union.

reddevil
2nd October 2008, 18:14
a vile stalinist despot. even mao thought him a tad demented.
whle we'r on the subject, can we stop the naked hero worship? marx, engles, trotsky, lenin, che, castro, kollontai, luxembourg etc. these were all fine men and women who deserve our respect. but they were human. all of them made terrible mistakes at one point in time. our search for messianic leaders to implement the revolution will be in vain. the workers have to take action themselves. it is the cause which we should be focused on, not the human beings who fight for it.

BobKKKindle$
2nd October 2008, 18:45
Nationalism is also encouraged by the left as a step in achieving socialism

Socialists do not encourage nationalist sentiments, because socialism cannot be achieved within the borders of one country alone, due to the fact that capitalism has now integrated every country into the world economy, such that each individual country is closely tied to and ultimately dependent on a large number of other countries, a process which has accelerated in recent years due to the rapid elimination of barriers to the movement of goods and investment capital between states. The internationalist position stems from the reality of the world economy, and requires that all socialists do anything possible to encourage revolution wherever a revolutionary situation exists, by providing material support to the revolutionary leadership and working in our own countries to remove any nationalist sentiments which may exist within the working class so that the workers will eventually realize that they all share interests in common, owing to their common experience of exploitation and political disenfranchisement under the capitalist system.