Log in

View Full Version : Chavez "is undermining democracy" according to Human Rights Watch report



spartan
18th September 2008, 22:53
Venezuela's president, Hugo Chávez, has flouted human rights, persecuted opponents and undermined democracy during his decade in power, according to a damning new report.

Human Rights Watch, a New York-based watchdog, today accused the socialist revolutionary of betraying a promise to shore up the rule of law and turn Venezuela into a progressive beacon.

The report claimed Chávez's government had taken over the courts and cowed the media, trade unions and civil society, leaving the South American oil giant dominated by an overmighty executive. "Discrimination on political grounds has been a defining feature of the Chávez presidency.. (as) has been an open disregard for the principle of separation of powers."

The 230-page report, titled A Decade Under Chávez: Political Intolerance and Lost Opportunities for Advancing Human Rights in Venezuela, is likely to fuel Caracas's suspicion that the United States is waging a campaign against it.

Government officials were not immediately available to rebut the allegations but the Washington-based Venezuela Information Office, which promotes the government's view, said Human Rights Watch was biased.

"Their reports on Venezuela have typically been politicised. They don't highlight real advances," said Olivia Goumbri, a spokeswoman. Lavish spending of oil revenues on social programmes, for instance, had boosted human rights by reducing poverty and illiteracy.

Human Rights Watch said Venezuela's worst setback in the past decade was a 2002 coup that briefly replaced Chávez, an anti-democratic putsch backed by the Bush administration. "Fortunately it lasted only two days. Unfortunately the Chávez government has exploited it ever since to justify policies that have degraded the country's democracy," said José Miguel Vivanco, the advocacy group's Americas director.

The report accused the government of sacrificing basic guarantees enshrined in a 1999 constitution - which Chávez had championed - to further its political agenda. It allegedly "neutralised the judiciary" by packing the supreme court with allies and undermined freedom of expression by toughening penalties for criminal defamation and bullying private media into softening criticism.

The report also accused the government of blacklisting opponents from state agencies and the national oil company, notably through a database of those who signed a petition against the president. It alleged that trade unions had been emasculated and that human rights activists had been harassed.

"Chávez has actively sought to project himself as a champion of democracy (but) Venezuela will not achieve real and sustained progress toward strengthening its democracy…so long as its government continues to flout the human rights principles enshrined in its own constitution."

The watchdog has issued more scathing reports about human rights abuses in Venezuela's neighbour, Colombia, which is waging a US-backed crackdown on leftist guerrillas and drug traffickers. Steve Ellner, a professor at Venezuela's University of the East, said Human Rights Watch overlooked the opposition's role in polarising Venezuela, not least by refusing to accept the president's legitimacy and electoral mandates.

"I would say the report is exaggerated. It fails to place events in their context," said the author of Rethinking Venezuelan Politics: class conflict and the Chávez phenomenon. "Put yourself in the shoes of Chávistas. They are convinced the opposition will stop short of nothing to get rid of Chávez."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/sep/18/venezuela.humanrights

With all the "bad" news coming out of Venezuela, it would seem that the US is drumming up support for an armed intervention to "restore democracy".

Abluegreen7
18th September 2008, 22:55
Chavez you have my back Comrade. You are making Venezuala independent. They will hunt you. I believe in you Chavez!

Abluegreen7
18th September 2008, 22:56
By killing Chavez the United States is likely to start the age of Revolution again!

Sendo
19th September 2008, 03:51
I criticize Chavez's top-heavy reforms because A, it's wrong,and B, it could all collapse once he's out of office.

But I wholeheartedly support him against the US. I have faith that the Venezuelans will make a stir if they don't like what he's doing.

MarxSchmarx
19th September 2008, 06:07
Bogus.

For a leader to have been re-elected by margins as large as Chavez's, as often as he has, to be accused of "undermining democracy" means that human rights watch knows squat about what democracy is all about.

I'd like to read the specifics of this. For example, writing stuff like:


bullying private media into softening criticism.

Do they mean the refusal to renew the broadcasting license of RCTV, that actively supported the coup? If the BBC or CNN or ABC or CBC or what have you supported a fascist, "anti-democratic putsch", of course their broadcasting license will, and probably should, be revoked.

As far as:

toughening penalties for criminal defamation
Once you accept that defamation is a crime, toughening its penalties is really no different than toughening the penalties for, say, kidnapping or running a red light. Unfortunately, in the modern state there is a view that such laws form the backbone, and establish the framework, for a free society. One cannot be for "human rights" (in this case, individual rights), and favor the toughening of ANY penalties. So the critique, which presumably comes form an organization that wouldn't be opposed to, say, the "toughening of laws" against something like financial fraud, is meaningless.

Of course even semi-decent leftists like Chavez need to be called out every now and then. For example, if Chavez did something GENUINELY authoritarian like re-introduce the death penalty, one could fairly say he's "undermining democracy". I'm no Chavista, I'm rather skeptical of his project and authenticity, but by golly this report, as quoted here, is chock-full of BS that if it were made against right-wing douchebags like the House of Sauds I'd feel impelled to criticize it thus.

La Comédie Noire
19th September 2008, 06:14
When you piss off imperialism it's what you have to do. We should be more concerned with what he is doing to Worker's power.

Abluegreen7
19th September 2008, 06:23
Please America leave Chavez alone. You always bully the Left. Why do they whine about the invasion of Georgia if they want to take down an Independent democratic state? Pretty hypocritical.

RadioRaheem84
19th September 2008, 17:22
The faux bourgeois liberal human rights organization. It will dismiss Chavez and openly write about what is causing the problems in Venezuela. But seem to leave out what exactly caused the repression in Latin America during the Cold War and during the 90s in China: FREE MARKET REFORMS.

Holden Caulfield
19th September 2008, 17:25
Please America leave Chavez alone. You always bully the Left. Why do they whine about the invasion of Georgia if they want to take down an Independent democratic state? Pretty hypocritical.

keep these type of comment minimal eh...

piet11111
19th September 2008, 18:21
The faux bourgeois liberal human rights organization. It will dismiss Chavez and openly write about what is causing the problems in Venezuela. But seem to leave out what exactly caused the repression in Latin America during the Cold War and during the 90s in China: FREE MARKET REFORMS.

they always made sure not to mention that the free market reforms are the reason why such repression was necessary as they are largely dependent on the american governments money and corporate donations (ford foundation for one) from the western nations that did a lot of their business there.

and nothing changed since then so they are still the stick of western capitalism against country's that oppose them.