More piling on the French

[HankMorgan]

www.albinoblacksheep.com/text/victories.html

enjoy

[Chiak47]

priceless.

[Anonymous]

LOL LOL

Classic.

[Dirty Jersey]

you guys are retarded. the french almost took over the world under napoleon won ww1 (america wasnt really needed in that one) their potential vietnam (algeria) ended rather well. joan of arc lead france to victory as well. that shit is whack.

[Liberty Lover]

the french almost took over the world under napoleon

The key word being 'almost'

america wasnt really needed in that one

Nor were the French.

joan of arc lead france to victory as well

None of us have a problem with French women...they are often quite attractive.


(Edited by Liberty Lover at 6:34 am on Mar. 27, 2003)

[Chiak47]

DJ,
Due to the fact that we bailed France out during WW2 and they refuse to help us now due to THIER interests in Iraq We (Americans and friends) have the right to piss in thier wheaties.
http://www.gunsnet.net/forums/images/smilies/peeeifel.gif

Thank you,
Me

[Anonymous]

http://www.gunsnet.net/forums/images/smilies/peeeifel.gif

That's one of the greatest smilies ever.

[kylie]

you idiots, the whole situation with france was caused by the very thing america advocates most: capitalism.
frances motives are of course not honorable, they are looking out only for their own interest. but this
is an inevitable result of capitalism- countries
will compete. to disagree with what france has done, you must disagree with capitalism itself and the resulting imperialism. it is these things which
cause france to speak how it does. and what country defends and utilises this system the most? the USA of course. so to criticise france, you must by your
logic be criticising your own country too.

note how france has accepted the propaganda regarding iraqi weaponry. it has agreed with all that has been claimed by the US and UK, bar method
of dealing with it. due to this, its policy on iraq is almost identical to that of the two governments. as people who are supposed to be capitalist, i would have thought you would be much more patriotic to your country. to be opposing frances position, you must be a leftist?

[Dirty Jersey]

france may be capitalist right now, but the socialists almost won the elections this year. i think you boys should support france as best you can because it will definitely change before the us. france has been on again off again socialist since the fifties. as for chiak you ignorant jackass world war won was fought on french soil. how do you suggest it would have succeeded without them.

[Mazdak]

Hasto el victoria siempro

[Exploited Class]

Quote: from Chiak47 on 6:33 am on Mar. 27, 2003
DJ,
Due to the fact that we bailed France out during WW2 and they refuse to help us now due to THIER interests in Iraq We (Americans and friends) have the right to piss in thier wheaties.


You bailed them out? You first waited around till Germany took over half of Europe, till millions of civillians were dead, till the rest of the world, like Russia, Britian and France had fought vigilantly against Germany and weakened them, then came in and claim total victory for yourself.

What is truly pathetic is the egotistical belief that you won the war by yourself, not noting the fact that you were met in Berlin at the same time with Russia.

I mean, I could see it if America had been there from the start and maybe helped France avoid being occupied, but you didn't. You sat around and waited how long before helping out? I'd stop the self-congratulations and adulations for your country's great support since it sat around on its hands for a good 5 years before deciding to aid.

And if I was the rest of the world, I wouldn't ask for America's hand in aid when the going is tough if they are going to hold it against me for the rest of my life.

You are like those friends, that when one is down and needing some help, and you help them. You never fucking let them live it down, reminding them day after day how you saved their ass when they needed some assitance.

[Chiak47]

It was not our war.After WW1 when we did bail them out and took alot of KIA's nobody was there for us.So along came WW2 and we wanted to sit out of it as long as we could.

We could have just bypassed all of Europe and fought in the Pacific.

[Exploited Class]

Quote: from Chiak47 on 3:41 am on Mar. 28, 2003
It was not our war.After WW1 when we did bail them out and took alot of KIA's nobody was there for us.So along came WW2 and we wanted to sit out of it as long as we could.

We could have just bypassed all of Europe and fought in the Pacific.

Its not our war. Obviously you didn't understand the title of the war, that being World War.

[Chiak47]

Yea I heard about all the swalli come running when the bells for the war were rung.

Get a new tit to suck on.

[Dirty Jersey]

i always figured world war meant first world powers and perhaps some of their colonies. also we would eventually have had to get involved. i doubt hitler would have let us be. ever wonder why germany was interested in mexico or did you think it was just a coincidence.

[Liberty Lover]

Quote: from Dirty Jersey on 11:02 am on Mar. 27, 2003
france may be capitalist right now, but the socialists almost won the elections this year.


What are you on about? The socialists were crushed in the elections. They didn't even make the final round. The union for a Popular Movement and the National Front did...no socialists there buddy.

[Dirty Jersey]

half the country forgot to vote in the primarys. it was a close race at first until they woke up. most didnt care to vote so they almost accidentally turned socialist. i voted in that election and followed it daily. i may live in jersey but they mailed us ballots since were french citizens. alot of people were scared in the primarys. wouldnt expect you to know that though since you probably looked up the election results online buddy.

[Liberty Lover]

"wouldnt expect you to know that though since you probably looked up the election results online"

What does me looking up election results online have do to with anything?

http://www.electionworld.org/election/

[Dirty Jersey]

because that site doesnt state the rush to the polls after jospin was leading in the first couple days of the primarys. thanks for proving my point. had .8% of voters gone with jospin chirac could have lost. the two party system sucks. just by primary results you can see if jospin had been the second candidate instead of le pen chirac would only have had about 60-65% of the vote. thus proving that france is close to becoming a socialist country. it also only shows the race between two partys neither of which are socialist so voter turnout is very debateable. besides i never said it was socialist i said they came close and i was right so im pretty sure theres no way you can win this argument. bye bye buddy.

[Liberty Lover]

France is not close to becoming a socialist country because the opposition Socialist Party is more of a social democratic party. Maybe if the French Communist Party came to power it would be socialist. French people are fairly stupid...but not that stupid.

[Dirty Jersey]

youd be surprised. anyway im getting tired of this argument so im just going to agree to disagree since its obvious neither one of us will give up our position. i feel i proved my argument. whether or not you accept that couldnt mean any less to me.

[Liberty Lover]

whether or not you accept that couldnt mean any less to me.

That's just as well

[LOIC]

Socialist party in france is a joke.
It's just a bunch of bourgeois who pretend to be leftist but who only speak about privatisation,...
In fact if socialists had the power, it would change nothing.
That's the problem: a lot of leftist vote for them instead of voting for real leftists.
In my opinion, the french socialist party has betrayed it's ideals.

"Maybe if the French Communist Party came to power it would be socialist"

Unfortunately, they are as pathetic as french socialists.