spartan
11th September 2008, 04:28
I mean the signs are there if you look not to hard enough.
We have the US puppet Musharraf who was recently forced from power and ever since (well actually before when it was becoming increasingly obvious that Musharraf wouldn't be hanging onto power for long) the US has been increasingly hostile/critical of Pakistan and it's fight with it's own citizens (who make up a large portion of the recruits who fight for the Taleban in Afghanistan) in the border tribal regions of the country.
The US wants to conduct operations within Pakistan on the border regions with Afghanistan as this is where the Taleban and Al-Qaeda are strongest (recruits and bases) and retreat to regroup after fighting in Afghanistan.
However the new Pakistan president Zardari is saying no to these US overtures as he thinks it will inflame the situation (not to say the least the Pakistan political situation which is very unstable) amongst other things.
As such this issue (militants in Pakistan and the US's inability to engage them in combat) has been seeing more news coverage than normal (perhaps the media trying to justify a future US attack in this region?).
Then we also have the nuclear issue as Pakistan is a nuclear power which means that it's weapons (in a nightmare scenario) could fall into the hands of Islamists who would then use it against the west or to stop western attempts at dominating the region (Afghanistan and Pakistan).
There is also the fact that, by and large, the Pakistani people don't like their country's alliance with America as they see it as the primary cause of all their country's recent problems (i.e. dictatorship, Islamists, suicide bombings, assassinations and civil war, etc).
At the very least I think the US is trying to deliberately destabilise the political situation in Pakistan so it then has an excuse to go in and "restore democracy" whilst at the same time being able to open up a new front against the Taleban/Al-Qaeda which it has been dreaming of doing since the Taleban resurgence a few years back.
We have the US puppet Musharraf who was recently forced from power and ever since (well actually before when it was becoming increasingly obvious that Musharraf wouldn't be hanging onto power for long) the US has been increasingly hostile/critical of Pakistan and it's fight with it's own citizens (who make up a large portion of the recruits who fight for the Taleban in Afghanistan) in the border tribal regions of the country.
The US wants to conduct operations within Pakistan on the border regions with Afghanistan as this is where the Taleban and Al-Qaeda are strongest (recruits and bases) and retreat to regroup after fighting in Afghanistan.
However the new Pakistan president Zardari is saying no to these US overtures as he thinks it will inflame the situation (not to say the least the Pakistan political situation which is very unstable) amongst other things.
As such this issue (militants in Pakistan and the US's inability to engage them in combat) has been seeing more news coverage than normal (perhaps the media trying to justify a future US attack in this region?).
Then we also have the nuclear issue as Pakistan is a nuclear power which means that it's weapons (in a nightmare scenario) could fall into the hands of Islamists who would then use it against the west or to stop western attempts at dominating the region (Afghanistan and Pakistan).
There is also the fact that, by and large, the Pakistani people don't like their country's alliance with America as they see it as the primary cause of all their country's recent problems (i.e. dictatorship, Islamists, suicide bombings, assassinations and civil war, etc).
At the very least I think the US is trying to deliberately destabilise the political situation in Pakistan so it then has an excuse to go in and "restore democracy" whilst at the same time being able to open up a new front against the Taleban/Al-Qaeda which it has been dreaming of doing since the Taleban resurgence a few years back.