NO RUNNING COMMENTARY - PLEASE...

[Socialsmo o Muerte]

JUST A MESSAGE WHICH, I THINK, SOME OTHER MEMBERS WILL SUPPORT.

CAN PEOPLE NOT DELIVER RUNNING COMMENTARY ON EVENTS IN IRAQ. IM PRETTY SURE WE'RE ALL JUST ABOUT GLUED TO THE NEWS SO WE DONT NEED TO BE TOLD ON HERE WHAT'S GOING ON. PLEASE

[Pete]

*is not glued to the news*

Are you talking about the WAR thread in politics?

[Socialsmo o Muerte]

On the few forums on Iraq people have just started commentating. I did post on one of them, and with that realised that it was wrong.

[Pete]

*nods*

[Saint-Just]

I do not have time to watch the news, or time to read threads about Iraq, I did not even know the war started or what has happened.

I can type for a couple of minutes though, I won't look at those threads. But i'll look at this one, and tell you, if we watch the news we do not need a running commentary. However, those commentaries may inspire some kind of debate on events. I have not looked at any of them however....

[Socialsmo o Muerte]

How can you not be watching the news, Chairman Mao!

This is history in the making!

Crazy guy.

[canikickit]

CNN's coverage has been shown here the last couple of nights. It's so crap, I'm not learning anything - all I've seen is that stupid woman with the annoying accent. What sort of accent is that anyway?

Anyway, I'm sure people can discuss what they're seeing, it's not neccessarily a running commentary. Just don't open the threads.